1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

NVIDIA's Tegra K1 Jetson Will Be A Late April Debut

NVIDIA

Published on 03 April 2014 04:53 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in NVIDIA
4 Comments

In late March NVIDIA unveiled the Tegra K1 Jetson development board as a very exciting quad-core Cortex-A15 with NVIDIA's fifth companion core while also leveraging a Kepler GPU with 192 CUDA cores, Serial ATA support, USB 3.0 support, and other features. This exciting ARM development board will begin shipping later this month for less than $200 USD.

When writing about the Jetson single-board computer last month, I was super-excited about it and ordered one board myself right away and intend to order several more for Phoronix Linux benchmarking. When the Jetson single-board computer was announced I already was very fond of NVIDIA's Tegra K1 SoC with having checked out some K1 reference designs at GDC 2014. NVIDIA's also been backing open-source support for the Tegra K1 graphics to make things more exciting.

The Jetson board was announced with a $192 MSRP and a pledge to ship in April. Now that it's April, some Phoronix readers who also jumped on this bandwagon may be wondering about more details... Through more sources, I've found out that it's planned for a late April debut. Those who pre-ordered the Jetson will find their boards shipped in about three weeks if they ordered via NewEgg or NVIDIA.com. Everything I've heard from my sources about this Tegra K1 board remain very positive and that it's performing very well. Stay tuned and in three weeks we'll have up some very interesting new ARM benchmarks on Phoronix.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  2. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
  3. AMD A10-7800 & A6-7400K APUs Run Great On Linux
  4. Radeon Gallium3D Is Running Increasingly Well Against AMD's Catalyst Driver
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Radeon Graphics Yield Mixed Results With Linux 3.17 Kernel
  2. AMD's RadeonSI Driver Sped Up A Lot This Summer
  3. Intel's Latest Linux Graphics Code Competes Against OS X 10.9
  4. Intel Sandy Bridge Gets A Surprise Boost From Linux 3.17
Latest Linux News
  1. Intel Bay Trail Performance With Linux 3.16/3.17 & Mesa 10.3
  2. EFL Sees A Ton Of Work Following Recent v1.11 Release
  3. ARM Talks Up Wayland For Mali
  4. GNOME/GTK+ Human Interface Guidelines Updated
  5. Robocraft Is Rolling Over To Linux
  6. The Widely-Criticized New Commercial Linux Distro Is Now On Kickstarter
  7. Wayland & Weston 1.6 Alpha Released
  8. A New First-Person Mystery Game Might Be Coming To Linux
  9. Patch By Patch, LLVM Clang Gets Better At Building The Linux Kernel
  10. VC4 Gallium3D Driver Now Handles X With GLAMOR
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Systemd 216 Piles On More Features, Aims For New User-Space VT
  2. Btrfs Gets Talked Up, Googler Encourages You To Try Btrfs
  3. OSS radeon driver for A10-7850K (Kaveri)
  4. Could be avoid to use flash for show the benchmark on the articles?
  5. American Citizens running AMOK for food stamps
  6. What Linux Distribution Should Be Benchmarked The Most?
  7. Company I work for is looking to contribute to Open Source projects... but wrongly?
  8. Microsoft vs. Campaign