1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Ubuntu Still Talking About A Stable App API/ABI

Ubuntu

Published on 20 November 2013 03:34 PM EST
Written by Michael Larabel in Ubuntu
20 Comments

Ubuntu developers are still exploring the possibility of coming up with a stable API/ABI for its apps.

At the Ubuntu 12.04 Developer Summit that happened two years ago there was talk of coming up with a stable API for application developers outside of the kernel area.

The hope by Ubuntu back in 2011 was to produce more documentation and a stable API on the desktop side to assist application developers. The interfaces back then to make up this stable Ubuntu platform API were GNOME 3, GObject, libunity, libappindicator, GSettings, and Ubuntu One. Their call for this stable API was on the desktop (higher-level) side to help application developers target multiple Ubuntu releases and overall make it a better experience and comparable to that of writing an app for Windows or OS X.

Two years later, the Ubuntu developers are still wanting a stable API and ABI for apps. Of course, in the past two years a lot has changed. Now Canonical has a much greater focus on pushing their mobile ambitions. What they were looking at two years ago for their "stable" Ubuntu platform APIs is also much out the window. Unity 8 is a whole new shebang and they're far less dependent upon GNOME, Unity 8 is happening in Qt, and they also have their own Mir display server, among other changes and Canonical coming up with more of their own libraries/packages.

Today at the Ubuntu 14.04 virtual Developer Summit there was a session on "System framework for apps" where the stable API/ABI talk kept on going. The Ubuntu developers are still determining what to recommend app developers built against, what Canonical is to build their own Click packages against, how to support building against SDK versions, how to support running Click packages against older/newer packages, and what they can promise about API or ABI stability.

Years after the stable Ubuntu API/ABI discussions first started happening, they are still deciding about publishing a list of supported API/ABIs, testing and handling of API/ABI changes, etc. This is nothing about a stable kernel API/ABI or anything low-level and crazy like user-space drivers, etc.

One of the approaches talked about is utilizing a run-time chroot for changing supplied libraries to a package. This would likely be a nightmare with needing to maintain multiple chroots on the system for all supported runtimes. "Generating a chroot seems very heavy in terms of disk usage, might have to support 3-4 releases in parallel, of some hundreds of MB each..Ideally we would like to promise ABI and API stability for ever. However this has a cost. An upper bound might be the supported timeline of the Ubuntu releases. But it could be a lot less than that."

In the end, not too much was decided during the hour-long conversation, but the video is embedded below and the vUDS notes can be found on the session page.


About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 & E5-2687W v3 Compared To The Core i7 5960X On Linux
  2. Intel 120GB 530 Series SSD Linux Performance
  3. Btrfs/EXT4/XFS/F2FS RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Linux Benchmarks On Four SSDs
  4. AMD's Windows Catalyst Driver Remains Largely Faster Than Linux Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Apple OS X 10.10 vs. Ubuntu 14.10 Performance
  2. Mesa 10.5-devel Brings Some Intel Haswell HD Graphics Changes Over Mesa 10.3
  3. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers With Linux 3.18 + Mesa 10.4-devel
  4. Is The Open-Source NVIDIA Driver Fast Enough For Steam On Linux Gaming?
Latest Linux News
  1. DragonFlyBSD 4.0 Drops i386 Support, Improves Graphics
  2. Expensive "Free/Libre Software Laptop" Uses A NVIDIA GPU
  3. QEMU 2.2-rc3 Released, Final Release Pushed Back By Couple Days
  4. 64-bit ARM FreeBSD Support Is Taking Shape
  5. GCW Zero Starts Seeing New Game Releases
  6. Intel's Cherry Trail Delayed To Next Year
  7. Bq Introduces More Android Devices, But Still No Ubuntu Phones
  8. Qt 5.4 Release Candidate Expected Later This Week
  9. ArrayFire Accelerated Compute Library Open-Sourced
  10. Amazon's Fire TV Stick: A Nice, Affordable Media Center Option
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  2. Hurrican SDL Port
  3. Roadmap to Catalyst 14.10 ?
  4. how to configure module phoromatic ?
  5. PulseAudio 6.0 Is Coming & Other Linux Audio Plans For The Future
  6. Debian Developer Resigns From The Systemd Maintainership Team
  7. Cant get working Kaveri APU - A10-7850k
  8. Script for Fan Speed Control