1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Ubuntu Still Talking About A Stable App API/ABI

Ubuntu

Published on 20 November 2013 03:34 PM EST
Written by Michael Larabel in Ubuntu
20 Comments

Ubuntu developers are still exploring the possibility of coming up with a stable API/ABI for its apps.

At the Ubuntu 12.04 Developer Summit that happened two years ago there was talk of coming up with a stable API for application developers outside of the kernel area.

The hope by Ubuntu back in 2011 was to produce more documentation and a stable API on the desktop side to assist application developers. The interfaces back then to make up this stable Ubuntu platform API were GNOME 3, GObject, libunity, libappindicator, GSettings, and Ubuntu One. Their call for this stable API was on the desktop (higher-level) side to help application developers target multiple Ubuntu releases and overall make it a better experience and comparable to that of writing an app for Windows or OS X.

Two years later, the Ubuntu developers are still wanting a stable API and ABI for apps. Of course, in the past two years a lot has changed. Now Canonical has a much greater focus on pushing their mobile ambitions. What they were looking at two years ago for their "stable" Ubuntu platform APIs is also much out the window. Unity 8 is a whole new shebang and they're far less dependent upon GNOME, Unity 8 is happening in Qt, and they also have their own Mir display server, among other changes and Canonical coming up with more of their own libraries/packages.

Today at the Ubuntu 14.04 virtual Developer Summit there was a session on "System framework for apps" where the stable API/ABI talk kept on going. The Ubuntu developers are still determining what to recommend app developers built against, what Canonical is to build their own Click packages against, how to support building against SDK versions, how to support running Click packages against older/newer packages, and what they can promise about API or ABI stability.

Years after the stable Ubuntu API/ABI discussions first started happening, they are still deciding about publishing a list of supported API/ABIs, testing and handling of API/ABI changes, etc. This is nothing about a stable kernel API/ABI or anything low-level and crazy like user-space drivers, etc.

One of the approaches talked about is utilizing a run-time chroot for changing supplied libraries to a package. This would likely be a nightmare with needing to maintain multiple chroots on the system for all supported runtimes. "Generating a chroot seems very heavy in terms of disk usage, might have to support 3-4 releases in parallel, of some hundreds of MB each..Ideally we would like to promise ABI and API stability for ever. However this has a cost. An upper bound might be the supported timeline of the Ubuntu releases. But it could be a lot less than that."

In the end, not too much was decided during the hour-long conversation, but the video is embedded below and the vUDS notes can be found on the session page.


About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Scythe Mugen MAX
  2. Intel Core i7 5960X Haswell-E On Linux
  3. Intel 80GB 530 Series M.2 SSD On Linux
  4. With A New Motherboard, The Core i7 5960X Haswell-E Lights Up
Latest Linux Articles
  1. 7-Way Linux Desktop Gaming Comparison On Ubuntu 14.10
  2. Intel P-State vs. CPUFreq Benchmarks On The i7-5960X
  3. RadeonSI GLAMOR Benchmarks With X.Org Server 1.16
  4. RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst At 4K UHD On Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. X.Org Server 1.16.1 Released
  2. Mesa Gets Closer To Having OpenGL 4.0 Tessellation Support
  3. Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd
  4. F2FS Tools Gain FSCK Support
  5. FreeBSD 10.1 Has The New VT Driver, Hardware Improvements
  6. AntiMicro 2.6 Yields Greater Compatibility For Gamepads On Linux
  7. OpenGL 3.3 / GLSL 3.30 Lands For Intel Sandy Bridge On Mesa
  8. AMD's RadeonSI Gallium3D Driver Sees Some Improvements
  9. Mesa 10.3 Released With The Latest Open-Source GPU Driver Improvements
  10. GNOME 3.13.92 Officially Released
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Wasteland 2 Officially Launched Today, Including For Linux Gamers
  2. Can Linux kill a motherboard?
  3. X.Org Women Outreach Program Only Turns Up Two Applicants So Far
  4. New stress testing utility for GPU's
  5. Stop grabbing my keyboard :(
  6. New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd
  7. SSD seems slow
  8. R. Tyler restarts work on FreeBSD launchd port, openlaunchd