1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

KDevelop With Clang Greatly Improves Its C++ Handling

KDE

Published on 04 February 2014 12:40 PM EST
Written by Michael Larabel in KDE
33 Comments

The KDevelop Clang plug-in has been greatly improved and is on its way to replacing the KDE's integrated development environment existing C++ language support with this Clang-based solution.

There's been many KDevelop Clang improvements landing recently and its quality is surpassing KDevelop's own C++ plug-in that has its own C++ parser and other own implementations. Milian Wolff of KDE explained about Clang for KDevelop as "the magic bullet which we waited for, and which did not exist back when KDevelop 4.0 was started initially."

Using Clang with KDevelop instead of its own in-house C++ language support leads to a great code reduction: ~50k lines of code for its own solution versus ~2600 lines of code for hooking into Clang. The Clang parser is also much faster than KDevelop's own C++ parser with greater parallelism. KDevelop can also more easily support new C++ features seamlessly as they are added to Clang. Whether Qt Creator will follow KDevelop in this Clang route is still being determined.

Those curious about this KDevelop Clang support for improving its C++ language support in the open-source KDE IDE can be found via this blog post. Clang's library-based design and greater flexibility and modularity than GCC and other compilers also makes it easy for automatic code reformatting, greater IDE integration, support for rewriting C++ code in more modern standards, and other interesting possibilities.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  2. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
  3. AMD A10-7800 & A6-7400K APUs Run Great On Linux
  4. Radeon Gallium3D Is Running Increasingly Well Against AMD's Catalyst Driver
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Radeon Graphics Yield Mixed Results With Linux 3.17 Kernel
  2. AMD's RadeonSI Driver Sped Up A Lot This Summer
  3. Intel's Latest Linux Graphics Code Competes Against OS X 10.9
  4. Intel Sandy Bridge Gets A Surprise Boost From Linux 3.17
Latest Linux News
  1. Preview Of AMD Radeon R9 290 Hawaii Open-Source Performance
  2. Intel Bay Trail Performance With Linux 3.16/3.17 & Mesa 10.3
  3. EFL Sees A Ton Of Work Following Recent v1.11 Release
  4. ARM Talks Up Wayland For Mali
  5. GNOME/GTK+ Human Interface Guidelines Updated
  6. Robocraft Is Rolling Over To Linux
  7. The Widely-Criticized New Commercial Linux Distro Is Now On Kickstarter
  8. Wayland & Weston 1.6 Alpha Released
  9. A New First-Person Mystery Game Might Be Coming To Linux
  10. Patch By Patch, LLVM Clang Gets Better At Building The Linux Kernel
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Btrfs Gets Talked Up, Googler Encourages You To Try Btrfs
  2. Systemd 216 Piles On More Features, Aims For New User-Space VT
  3. OSS radeon driver for A10-7850K (Kaveri)
  4. Could be avoid to use flash for show the benchmark on the articles?
  5. American Citizens running AMOK for food stamps
  6. What Linux Distribution Should Be Benchmarked The Most?
  7. Company I work for is looking to contribute to Open Source projects... but wrongly?
  8. Microsoft vs. Campaign