1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

SNA Continues To Be Far Better Than UXA, GLAMOR

Intel

Published on 01 October 2013 11:58 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Intel
26 Comments

Intel's Chris Wilson has shared new performance data of UXA vs. GLAMOR vs. his prized SNA acceleration architecture for Intel 2D acceleration on the Linux desktop. To no incredible surprise, SNA is far better than UXA and GLAMOR for an Intel Iris Pro 5200 graphics processor.

SNA has matured a lot since its debut two years ago. With the forthcoming Intel 3.0 X.Org driver, this acceleration method is becoming the default over UXA. The OpenGL-based GLAMOR library just remains an experimental non-default option for the xf86-video-intel driver.

Our latest benchmarks have shown SNA continuing to work great and Chris Wilson's benchmarks of Cairo with SNA vs. UXA vs. GLAMOR show the same outcome.

Chris Wilson concluded on his blog, "The summary here is that Glamor offers a meagre improvement over UXA. However, both are still much slower on average than cairo-image, i.e. the performance attainable by using a single CPU core. It takes multiple threads inside the DDX to match the performance of cairo-image – this is due to the inherent inefficiencies of the current Render protocol. However, if we then utilize the render acceleration on the GPU (using SNA) we can indeed outperform cairo-image, on average about 2x faster and about 4x faster than UXA and Glamor. Thus SNA does deliver hardware acceleration that succeeds in offloading work onto the GPU (letting the CPU get on with other tasks) and performs faster than rendering everything with the CPU."

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. CompuLab Intense-PC2: An Excellent, Fanless, Mini PC Powered By Intel's i7 Haswell
  2. From The Atom 330 To Haswell ULT: Intel Linux Performance Benchmarks
  3. AMD Radeon R9 285 Tonga Performance On Linux
  4. Apotop Wi-Copy
Latest Linux Articles
  1. AMD Moves Forward With Unified Linux Driver Strategy, New Kernel Driver
  2. MSI: Update Your BIOS From The Linux Desktop
  3. NVIDIA vs. AMD 2D Linux Drivers: Catalyst Is Getting Quite Good At 2D
  4. 15-Way GPU Comparison With Mesa 10.3 + Linux 3.17
Latest Linux News
  1. GParted 0.20 Improves Btrfs Support
  2. EXT4 In Linux 3.18 Has Clean-ups, Bug Fixes
  3. Emacs 24.4 Has Built-In Web Browser, Improved Multi-Monitor Support
  4. NVIDIA's NVPTX Support For GCC Is Close To Being Merged
  5. KDE's KWin On Wayland Begins Using Libinput
  6. Khronos Releases OpenVX 1.0 Specification
  7. Linux Kernel Working Towards GNU11/C11 Compatibility
  8. Ubuntu 15.04 Is Codenamed After A Monkey: Vivid Vervet
  9. Following GCC, Clang Looks To Default To C11
  10. Users/Developers Threatening Fork Of Debian GNU/Linux
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Users/Developers Threatening Fork Of Debian GNU/Linux
  2. HOPE: The Ease Of Python With The Speed Of C++
  3. Bye bye BSD, Hello Linux: A Sys Admin's Story
  4. NVIDIA Presents Its Driver Plans To Support Mir/Wayland & KMS On Linux
  5. AMD Is Restructuring Again, Losing 7% Of Employees
  6. Open-Source AMD Fusion E-350 Support Takes A Dive
  7. Upgrade to Kaveri, very slow VDPAU performance
  8. ChromeOS Drops Support For EXT2/EXT3/EXT4 File-Systems