1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

SNA Continues To Be Far Better Than UXA, GLAMOR

Intel

Published on 01 October 2013 11:58 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Intel
26 Comments

Intel's Chris Wilson has shared new performance data of UXA vs. GLAMOR vs. his prized SNA acceleration architecture for Intel 2D acceleration on the Linux desktop. To no incredible surprise, SNA is far better than UXA and GLAMOR for an Intel Iris Pro 5200 graphics processor.

SNA has matured a lot since its debut two years ago. With the forthcoming Intel 3.0 X.Org driver, this acceleration method is becoming the default over UXA. The OpenGL-based GLAMOR library just remains an experimental non-default option for the xf86-video-intel driver.

Our latest benchmarks have shown SNA continuing to work great and Chris Wilson's benchmarks of Cairo with SNA vs. UXA vs. GLAMOR show the same outcome.

Chris Wilson concluded on his blog, "The summary here is that Glamor offers a meagre improvement over UXA. However, both are still much slower on average than cairo-image, i.e. the performance attainable by using a single CPU core. It takes multiple threads inside the DDX to match the performance of cairo-image – this is due to the inherent inefficiencies of the current Render protocol. However, if we then utilize the render acceleration on the GPU (using SNA) we can indeed outperform cairo-image, on average about 2x faster and about 4x faster than UXA and Glamor. Thus SNA does deliver hardware acceleration that succeeds in offloading work onto the GPU (letting the CPU get on with other tasks) and performs faster than rendering everything with the CPU."

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. A Walkthrough Of The New 32 System Open-Source Linux Benchmarking Test Farm
  2. Habey MITX-6771: Mini-ITX Board With Quad-Core J1900 Bay Trail
  3. OCZ Vector 150 SSD On Linux
  4. Noctua i4 CPU Cooler: Great For Cooling High-End LGA-2011v3 CPUs
Latest Linux Articles
  1. AMD Kaveri: Open-Source Radeon Gallium3D vs. Catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver
  2. 12-Way AMD Catalyst 14.12 vs. NVIDIA 346 Series Linux GPU Comparison
  3. AMD Catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver Brings Mixed Results For Linux Users
  4. 6-Way Winter 2014 Linux Distribution Comparison
Latest Linux News
  1. PostgreSQL 9.4 Brings JSONB & Many Other New Features
  2. That Nasty Linux Kernel Lockup Bug Is Still Unresolved
  3. KDE's Krita Loses Its Main Backer
  4. Inline Data Support Comes To CephFS With Linux 3.19
  5. VC4 Gallium3D Adds DMA-BUF Support, Yields Working DRI3
  6. GNOME Builder Is Still Building Up To A New IDE For Developers
  7. Raspberry Pi's Gallium3D Driver Could Now Run Significantly Faster
  8. CMake 3.1 Brings Windows Additions, Target Compile Feature
  9. KDE Applications 14.12 Released
  10. Fedora 21 Released For POWER & AArch64 Hardware
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Bench specific mount point
  2. XLennart: A Game For Systemd Haters With Nothing Better To Do
  3. Tool for measuring FPS in games
  4. Need some hand holding with upgrading xserver
  5. Ubuntu Developers Still Thinking What To Do About Adobe Flash Support
  6. Microsoft buying Mojang
  7. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  8. Premium subscription "login" times out much faster than forum