1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Differences Between X.Org, Wayland & Mir

Wayland

Published on 19 March 2013 08:26 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Wayland
51 Comments

Canonical's Christopher Halse Rogers has blogged some more about their views on the Mir Display Server and its design relative to X11/X.Org and Wayland.

Rogers has already written a lot about Mir in Canonical's attempt to promote the Wayland alternative and their views for designing it rather than using Wayland or forking it.

His latest blog post on the matter is Wayland, Mir, and X - different projects. Key points include:

- Google Protobuf is used as the IPC (Inter-Process Communication) method for Mir. ProtoBuf is short for Protocol Buffers and is Google's data interchange format.

- "Where the Wayland libraries are all about IPC, Mir is about producing a library to do the drudge work of a display-server-compositor-thing, so in this way it's more like Xorg than Wayland. In fact, it's a bit more specific - Mir is about creating a library to make the most awesome Unity display-server-compositor-thingy. We're not aiming to satisfy anyone's requirements but our own. That said, our requirements aren't likely to be hugely specific, so Mir will likely be generally useful."

- "Perhaps we'll become so awesome that it'll make sense for GNOME or KDE to rebase their compositors on Mir, but that's a long way away."

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Ubuntu 15.04 Is The Easy Path To Better Performance On Intel Broadwell
  2. NVIDIA's Latest Maxwell Line-Up Against AMD With Catalyst On Linux
  3. Preliminary Tests Of Intel Sandy Bridge & Ivy Bridge vs. Broadwell
  4. AMD FX-8320E Performance On Linux
  5. Linux Compiler Benchmarks Of LLVM Clang 3.5 vs. LLVM Clang 3.6-rc1
  6. Intel Broadwell HD Graphics 5500: Windows 8.1 vs. Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. Coreboot Now Supports Another Dual-Socket AMD Motherboard
  2. Atomic Mode-Setting/Display Support Progresses In Linux 3.20
  3. NVIDIA 340.76 Brings Three Stable Fixes
  4. Intel Broadwell-U P-State vs. ACPI CPUFreq Scaling Linux Performance
  5. DragonFlyBSD Is Almost To Linux 3.10 Era Intel Graphics Support
  6. New Beta Of Witcher 2 Aims For Greater Performance
  7. NVIDIA Tegra DRM Driver Supports Atomic Mode-Setting In Linux 3.20
  8. Linux "GHOST" Vulnerability Hits Glibc Systems
  9. Linux Game Publishing Remains Offline, Three Years After The CEO Shakeup
  10. PlayStation 4 System Compiler Support Landing In LLVM
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Windows 10 To Be A Free Upgrade: What Linux Users Need To Know
  2. LibreOffice 4.4 Is Coming Soon With New Features
  3. TraceFS: The Newest Linux File-System
  4. My Initial Intel Broadwell Linux Experience With The ThinkPad X1 Carbon
  5. Broadwell Linux Ultrabook Running MUCH Cooler Than Haswell
  6. LZHAM 1.0 Lossless Data Compression Codec Released
  7. Linux Users Upset By Chromium's Busted HiDPI Support
  8. Interstellar Marines On Linux With Catalyst: Bull S*#@