Wayland Still Working On Minimizing, Maximizing

Posted by Michael Larabel on March 08, 2013

Support for minimize and maximize requests is still being worked on the for the Wayland protocol. Yes, this is to allow windows to be minimized or maximized within the Wayland environment.

Even with Wayland's heavy community-driven development and the significant backing of Intel, Wayland/Weston right now doesn't support minimize/maximize for windows. There's been patches floating around and now they're up to their third revision as of Friday.

Scott Moreau on Thursday published his third revision to the Wayland minimize/maximize protocol.
In order for clients to notify the compositor that they wish to be minimized, a minimize request is needed. This can be used to minimize the surface when a user clicks a minimize button for example.

The compositor needs a way to tell clients to maximize and unmaximize their surfaces. The desktop shell client can ask the compositor to send a surface an (un)maximize event, in response to a panel button for example.

The compositor can minimize and unminimize surfaces but clients can only request that its surface is minimized. The client doesn't need to be involved in a minimize action, unlike (un)maximize, it only needs a way to track its minimize state and request to be minimized. This patch adds minimize and unminimize protocol events for this purpose.

Further, the term minimize is relatively subjective and defined by the implementation. Clients should not expect that minimized means the surface will be invisable to the user. There are several use cases where displaying minimized surfaces will be useful. Clients might want to change input handling or pause when minimized but nothing should change with regards to submitting surface buffer updates.
This work will likely be integrated in time for the next release of Wayland and the reference Weston compositor. This shows how long it takes to design and implement well a full-featured modern display server, with Wayland having been developed for about five years now while Canonical hopes Mir will be ready by later in the year and ready for all form-factors by next April.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 vs. AMD Radeon Graphics On Linux
  2. Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 Performance On Ubuntu Linux
  3. Intel Core i7 4770K "Haswell" Benchmarks On Ubuntu Linux
  4. The First Experience Of Intel Haswell On Linux
Latest Software Articles
  1. Optimized Binaries Provide Great Benefits For Intel Haswell
  2. 11-Way Linux, BSD Platform Comparison
  3. SNA Acceleration Works Great For Intel Core i7 Haswell
  4. The Linux Evolution For Intel Haswell's Performance
Latest Linux News
  1. D Language Still Showing Promise, Advancements
  2. Planetary Annihilation Released For Linux Gamers
  3. Gentoo Starts Work On KDE-Wayland Support
  4. NVIDIA To License Its Kepler GPU Technology
  5. KDE's KWin Made Lots Of Progress In 4.11
  6. Ubuntu Announces Carrier Advisory Group
  7. Qt 5.1 Release Candidate 1 Has Arrived
  8. In-Fighting Continues Over Mir On Non-Unity Ubuntu
  9. Subversion 1.8 Presents New Features
  10. LLVM 3.3 Officially Released
  11. LLVM/Clang Now Uses Loop Vectorizer At New Levels
Latest Forum Talk
  1. In-Fighting Continues Over Mir On Non-Unity Ubuntu
  2. D Language Still Showing Promise, Advancements
  3. The Wayland Situation: Facts About X vs. Wayland
  4. Planetary Annihilation Plans To Come To Linux
  5. Intel GPU Driver Tries To Rip Out FBDEV Support
  6. Mir Still Causing Concerns By Ubuntu Derivatives
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite