1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Canonical's Mir Project Retracts Wayland Criticism

Ubuntu

Published on 05 March 2013 01:45 PM EST
Written by Michael Larabel in Ubuntu
55 Comments

If you are now to look at Ubuntu's Mir specification page for their new display server, you will see that their open criticism of Wayland/Weston has disappeared.

When Canonical announced their X.Org Server replacement not based on Wayland yesterday, it surprised many end-users and developers alike. In their initial specification page, they criticized Wayland by saying that they couldn't base their solution on Wayland because it "suffers from multiple problems." Among the problems they mentioned were the input event handling partly recreates X semantics, the shell integration parts of the protocol are considered privileged, and that "it didn't find out requirements."

Kristian Høgsberg, the founder of the five-year-old Wayland project was quick to say Canonical's claims are unfounded and his negativity was also met by other upstream X.Org / Wayland developers. These upstream developers outright don't agree with Canonical's assessment of Wayland but there's more of a feeling that Mark Shuttleworth's company was just suffering from "Not Invented Here" syndrome, again.

There was a colorful IRC discussion on the Wayland IRC channel yesterday where one of the Mir developers admitted to not knowing a lot about Wayland's input handling and other interesting statements. Kristian in that exchange called out Canonical "don't piss on wayland in the process."

Now this morning, Thomas Voß, one of the Canonical Mir developers has revised the Wiki page.

The Mir specification removed the Wayland criticism and added that Wayland's input event handling has indeed been improved compared to X, plus added some more jargon, and ultimately concluded with: "However, we still think that Wayland's attempt at standardizing the communication between clients and the display server component is very sensible and useful, but due to our different requirements we decided to go for the following architecture [with regard] to protocol-integration."

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Btrfs On 4 x Intel SSDs In RAID 0/1/5/6/10
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290 On Ubuntu 14.10: RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst
  3. MSI X99S SLI PLUS On Linux
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
Latest Linux Articles
  1. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Radeon Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Driver Comparison
  2. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers On Ubuntu 14.10
  3. Ubuntu 14.10 Offers AMD Radeon Driver Performance Improvements
  4. Btrfs RAID: Linux 3.10 To Linux 3.18 Benchmarks
Latest Linux News
  1. GLAMOR Acceleration Continues To Be Cleaned Up
  2. Russia's Yandex Web Browser Finally Released For Linux
  3. Linux Kernel Finally Being Optimized For SSHDs
  4. GPU Profiling Support Lands In Mozilla Firefox
  5. Kubuntu 15.04 Will Use KDE's Plasma 5 By Default
  6. KDBUS Submitted For Review To The Mainline Linux Kernel
  7. An Intel-Based Ubuntu Touch Tablet Is Planning To Launch Soon
  8. MIAOW: An Open-Source GPU Design Based On AMD's Southern Islands
  9. X.Org Server 1.17 RC1 Released, Exciting For GLAMOR & Modesetting
  10. OpenGL 4.x Support For Mesa Still Inching Along
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Reducing The CPU Usage In Mesa To Improve Performance
  2. Is foolish currently develop in machine code, hexadecimal and assembly?
  3. Help diagnosing problems with a Readon HD 4670 on Mesa 10.3.2-1
  4. Advertisements On Phoronix
  5. nv and xorg.conf under Debian PPC
  6. Looking for a Open-Source AMD experienced Linux mentor
  7. Bad perfomance in gaming
  8. Dead Island for Linux (?)