1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

X.Org Server Development Process Is Questioned

X.Org

Published on 24 February 2013 01:03 PM EST
Written by Michael Larabel in X.Org
48 Comments

For the past few years the X.Org Server has managed to get back on track for being released bi-annually and without too many delays. However, the server has also fallen into a habit where it's being released without all of the "blocker bugs" being cleared.

Alan Coopersmith raised the issue earlier this month on the X.Org developers' list. "We've never been good about fixing all the bugs on the release tracker, but it appears we've gotten out of the habit of even just reviewing the bugs and moving them forward to the next release when we're done, as most open bugs are still stuck under the 1.12 & 1.13 trackers."

Some bugs end up getting closed while other bugs are just delayed to being fixed to a later release or the bug reports not even being updated. While Coopersmith raised the issue two weeks ago, it didn't spark much of a conversation among X.Org developers about how this situation can be improved upon and corrected.

On Friday a point was raised by a user where one of the bugs was fixed weeks ago, tested by two other stakeholders, posted to the xorg-devel mailing list, but never applied to the X.Org Server Git tree. Under the current X.Org Server development process, Keith Packard of Intel serves as the release manager in a similar position to Linus Torvalds where developers need to call upon him to pull their Git trees / patches to be applied to mainline.

In a new mailing list post on Saturday, David Airlie of Red Hat is now questioning this xorg-server development process that's been going on for the past couple of years. "Yeah I even included it in a pull request that was ignored for ages, and when some bits got applied the rest is still being ignored. At this point I'd like to suggest something is broken and we go back to the mesa style system for master, where anyone can commit once we have an R-b from the list. All in favour say aye?"

David is proposing that the X.Org Server development goes back to the old ways whereby any developer can basically commit directly to the tree rather than queuing up work and waiting for Keith Packard to pull it. This process is similar to how Mesa is developed and avoids bottlenecks and single points of failure. While it's the weekend, so far no other developers have commented on this possible change for how the X.Org Server is developed.

Meanwhile, X.Org Server 1.14 is due for release in early March.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. MSI X99S SLI PLUS On Linux
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
  3. CompuLab Intense-PC2: An Excellent, Fanless, Mini PC Powered By Intel's i7 Haswell
  4. From The Atom 330 To Haswell ULT: Intel Linux Performance Benchmarks
Latest Linux Articles
  1. RunAbove: A POWER8 Compute Cloud With Offerings Up To 176 Threads
  2. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Linux Desktop Benchmarks
  3. Ubuntu 14.10 XMir System Compositor Benchmarks
  4. Btrfs RAID HDD Testing On Ubuntu Linux 14.10
Latest Linux News
  1. Fedora 21 Beta & Final Release Slip Further
  2. Mesa 10.3.2 Has A Couple Bug-Fixes
  3. RadeonSI/R600g HyperZ Support Gets Turned Back On
  4. openSUSE Factory & Tumbleweed Are Merging
  5. More Fedora Delays: Fedora 21 Beta Slips
  6. Mono Brings C# To The Unreal Engine 4
  7. Coreboot Now Has Support For Intel Broadwell Hardware
  8. Enlightenment's EFL 1.12 Alpha Has Evas GL-DRM Engine, OpenGL ES 1.1 Support
  9. GTK+ Lands Experimental Backend For Mir Display Server
  10. Ubuntu 14.10 Officially Released
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. HOPE: The Ease Of Python With The Speed Of C++
  2. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  3. Ubuntu 16.04 Might Be The Distribution's Last 32-Bit Release
  4. Linux hacker compares Solaris kernel code:
  5. Advertisements On Phoronix
  6. Users/Developers Threatening Fork Of Debian GNU/Linux
  7. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  8. Proof that strlcpy is un-needed