Ubuntu Touch/Tablet Is Using SurfaceFlinger

Posted by Michael Larabel on February 22, 2013

One of the first things I wanted to check when installing the Ubuntu Touch/Tablet Developer Preview is seeing what display server / compositor was in use by this newest Ubuntu Linux variant. Wayland? Compiz on X?

With the release on Thursday of the Ubuntu Touch Developer Preview, I was especially curious what display server / compositor they were using since previously they expressed interest in Wayland/Weston for the Ubuntu desktop and mobile devices. Earlier this month there were then reports that Ubuntu developed its own alternative -- not X or Wayland. They might also be using DirectFB or Android's SurfaceFlinger or some other alternative.

Well, after installing the Ubuntu Touch Developer Preview on the Google Nexus 7 (Tegra 3) and Nexus 10 (Exynos 5 Dual), I had an answer.

The current Ubuntu Touch implementation is relying upon SurfaceFlinger, the compositor developed by Google that's used within Android, as its system compositor.

This isn't a huge surprise that Canonical is relying upon Android's SurfaceFlinger as its compositor instead of Compiz on X, Wayland, or other alternatives. Ubuntu Touch relies upon an Android layer that is very close to CyanogenMod 10.1. The low-level layer powering Ubuntu Touch is the open-source Android / CyanogenMod code and with that comes SurfaceFlinger as the compositor.

More exploration results from this early Ubuntu Touch preview are forthcoming, including Ubuntu performance benchmarks from the Google Nexus 7 and Nexus 10.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. GCC 4.8.0 vs. LLVM Clang 3.3 Compiler Performance
  2. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  3. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  4. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
Latest Linux News
  1. A New X.Org-Free Wayland LiveCD Released
  2. Unity 8, Mir Made Progress This Week On Features
  3. LLVM Clang 3.3 RC2 Is Ready For Testing
  4. AMD RadeonSI Gallium3D Begins Simple CL Demos
  5. Intel Shows Off GNOME3-Based Tizen Shell
  6. Linux Desktop Security Could Be A Whole Lot Better
  7. KDE 4.11 Will Be The Last Major KDE4 Workspaces Feature Release
  8. New NVIDIA Linux Driver Supports The GeForce GTX 780
  9. Chrome 28 To Offer More Speed Improvements
  10. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  11. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
Latest Forum Talk
  1. A New X.Org-Free Wayland LiveCD Released
  2. Intel Shows Off GNOME3-Based Tizen Shell
  3. Is there anyway to improve the performance of the...
  4. KDE 4.11 Will Be The Last Major KDE4 Workspaces...
  5. Steam: No used games...
  6. New Intel X.Org Driver Supports All Of Haswell
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite