1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Kernel-Based X11 Server Claims 2x Performance Over X.Org

X.Org

Published on 24 June 2013 06:37 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in X.Org
45 Comments

MicroXwin is an X.Org Server alternative for an X Windows System implementation for Unix/Linux desktop. The developers behind MicroXwin are claiming that by implementing their X Server in the kernel they are getting a 2x performance advantage while using less memory and being binary compatible with Xlib.

MicroXwin itself isn't brand new, but Vasant Kanchan, a MicroXwin developer, wrote into Phoronix today to remind us about their project. "We make X windows implementation in the kernel. Your readers may be interested in MicroXwin performance against Xorg X-Windows."

Having a full X Server in the kernel may scare some readers, but they claim MicroXwin has 2x times faster graphics, faster event handling, lower latency, and low round-trip delays than a traditional X Server. They also claim MicroXwin's kernel-based X Server uses less than a half MB compared to 29MB used by X.Org's frame-buffer X Server. While being leaner, MicroXwin also claims binary compatibility with standard X11 at the Xlib layer -- meaning all standard Linux desktop applications should work atop this solution.

The last release of MicroXwin was version 2.4 and happened in late October of last year. MicroXwin 2.4 brought support for virtual consoles and the ability to run inside of Google Android. The previous release to 2.4 was version 2.3 and was from mid 2011.

Vasant Kanchan passed along this video comparing MicroXwin to Xorg X11:

Those wishing to learn more about MicroXwin can find additional details at MicroXwin.com. With packages available for Ubuntu 12.04 and Debian 6.0 of MicroXwin, benchmarks are likely to come soon on Phoronix pending sufficient reader interest -- let us know via the forums and Twitter.

While MicroXwin is supposedly much faster, for those wondering about the downsides, this X11 implementation isn't open-source and their kernel modules available for download are for evaluation/non-commercial use while for other uses they need to be licensed.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. 13-Way Low-End GPU Comparison With AMD's AM1 Athlon
  2. ASUS AM1I-A: A Mini-ITX Board For Socketed Kabini APUs
  3. Mini-Box M350: A Simple, Affordable Mini-ITX Case
  4. Overclocking The AMD AM1 Athlon & Sempron APUs
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Ubuntu 12.04.4 vs. 13.10 vs. 14.04 LTS Desktop Benchmarks
  2. AMD OpenCL Performance With AM1 Kabini APUs
  3. A Quick Look At GCC 4.9 vs. LLVM Clang 3.5
  4. Are AMD Athlon/Sempron APUs Fast Enough For Steam On Linux?
Latest Linux News
  1. Git 2.0 Test Releases Begin With Many Changes
  2. Wine 1.7.17 Works On Its Task Scheduler, C Run-Time
  3. The Improv ARM Board Still Isn't Shipping; Riding A Dead Horse?
  4. Debian To Maintain 6.0 Squeeze As An LTS Release
  5. Wasteland 2 Is Finally Released For Linux Gamers
  6. FreeBSD Advances For ARM, Bhyve, Clang
  7. Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" Officially Released
  8. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS vs. 14.04 LTS Server Benchmarks
  9. QEMU 2.0 Released With ARM, x86 Enhancements
  10. Running The Unity 8 Preview Session On Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
  11. R600 Gallium3D Disables LLVM Back-End By Default
  12. Fedora 21 Gets GNOME 3.12, PHP 5.6, Mono 3.4
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Suggestions about how to make a Radeon HD 7790 work decently?
  2. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  3. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  4. Radeon 8000M problematic on Linux?
  5. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  6. After Jack Keane, RuseSoft will briing Ankh 3 to Linux through Desura
  7. Suspected PHP Proxy Issue
  8. Change installation destination from home directory