1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

Oracle To Work On Mesa Driver For VirtualBox

Mesa

Published on 20 June 2013 12:02 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Mesa
38 Comments

An Oracle engineer is beginning to look at developing a Mesa-based graphics driver for their VM VirtualBox software that could be integrated into the mainline Mesa code-base.

After VMware, VirtualBox provides a fairly nice means of exposing 3D/OpenGL acceleration to guest virtual machines when installing their own custom-developed driver. The guest driver passes the 3D calls to the host to then be accelerated on the hardware. Right now their VirtualBox guest driver isn't Mesa/Gallium3D-based while VMware has its own Gallium3D driver.

It now seems Oracle is investigating creating its own Mesa driver. Michael Thayer, an Oracle engineer, wrote on the Mesa mailing list about a Mesa driver for VirtualBox.
I am looking at the possibility of writing a driver for VirtualBox (ahem, yes) which could partly live inside of the Mesa tree. My initial idea was to have the driver in two parts, a driver/client part in the Mesa tree and a server part in the VirtualBox tree which would communicate using an agreed-on protocol through a local socket. The reasons for wanting to split the driver this way are on the one hand that we still don't feel quite ready to commit our host-guest 3D interface to eternity, and on the other that the driver part on the Mesa side might well be useful in other contexts - controlled 3D access (insofar as such a thing is possible) out of a sand box comes to mind.

I was considering a textual protocol between client and server which would more or less model the Gallium3D API, with (texture and other) buffers passed using shared memory via file descriptors. Gallium3D would have the advantage that it is a much smaller target surface (if I may use that word) than OpenGL. It has the disadvantage that it is closer to D3D than to OpenGL, which may be better for modelling hardware, but perhaps less so for proxying OpenGL APIs on a guest to OpenGL APIs on a host. In particular the fact that we can't directly access the GLSL shader source which applications on a guest system are presumably trying to send us, and which we need to pass through to the host, disturbs me somewhat. Of course, I realise that on the other hand this potentially gives us access to shaders in different formats, but our main target will still be OpenGL on OpenGL for the immediately forseeable future. I understand that Gallium3D receives shaders in a format close to compiled D3D shaders, which suggests that WineD3D might be of use. An alternative is to go straight for a DRI driver rather than a Gallium3D one. I would be interested in any thoughts and suggestions!
Interesting, and hopefully it will bear fruit. Right now VMware is much faster than VirtualBox in our Linux OpenGL tests. Meanwhile, for Linux QEMU/KVM we are still waiting for any form of 3D hardware acceleration support for virtualized guests.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux News
  1. Dell Gets An Airplane Mode Switch Driver In Linux 4.2
  2. I Gave Up Waiting On The Water-Cooled Radeon R9 Fury X
  3. NVIDIA Tegra X1 Chromebooks Appear Closer, Support Added To Coreboot
  4. Pinos Is For Linux Video What PulseAudio Is For Audio
  5. Crossing 200,000 Benchmark Results Posted On LinuxBenchmarking.com
  6. New Mesa Vec4 Backend For Intel, Supports Their NIR Goals
  7. "PulseVideo" Coming To Complement PulseAudio?
  8. Premium Users Now Can Experience Our New Site
  9. XFS Will Get DAX Support In The Linux 4.2 Kernel
  10. X.Org Server Lands More Mode-Setting/GLAMOR Improvements, But No Sign Of 1.18
Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. How KDE VDG Is Trying To Make Open-Source Software Beautiful
  2. Attempting To Try Out BCache On The Linux 4.1 Kernel
  3. CompuLab's Fitlet Is A Very Tiny, Fanless, Linux PC With AMD A10 Micro
  4. AMD A10-7870K Godavari: RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Linux Drivers
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Kubuntu 15.10 Could Be The End Of The Road
  2. Linus Is Looking Forward To Merging KDBUS, But Not Convinced By Performance
  3. NVIDIA Starts Supplying Open-Source Hardware Reference Headers
  4. KDBUS Won't Be Pushed Until The Linux 4.3 Kernel
  5. The Staging Pull For Linux 4.2: "Big, Really Big"
  6. Linux 4.2 Kernel Gets Port To New Processor Architecture
  7. The State & Complications Of Porting The Unity Editor To Linux
  8. SteamOS "Brewmaster" Is Valve's New Debian 8.1 Based Version