Linux Foundation Struggles With Microsoft UEFI Signing

Posted by Michael Larabel on November 20, 2012

James Bottomley has written about the problems being faced by the Linux Foundation in having a Microsoft-approved validly-signed UEFI pre-bootloader.

There's many hurdles to jump from Microsoft and Verisign/Symantec for obtaining a valid signing key. There's third-party open-source tools for handling much of the signing process, but in the end Windows is still needed due to a Silverlight-based file uploader for the UEFI binary. The Mono-based Moonlight doesn't work with the Silverlight uploader. After uploading the cabinet file for signing, there's a seven-stage process.

Unfortunately, it's with this seven-stage process on Microsoft's end is where the Linux Foundation binary is stuck. "I’m still not sure what the actual problem is, but if you look at the Subject of the signing key, there’s nothing in the signing key to indicate the Linux Foundation, therefore I suspect the problem is that the binary is signed with a generic Microsoft key instead of a specific (and revocable) key tied to the Linux Foundation."

Bottomley ends with, "We’re still waiting for Microsoft to give the Linux Foundation a validly signed pre-bootloader. When that happens, it will get uploaded to the Linux Foundation website for all to use." The full status can be read on his blog.

For those not familiar with the Linux Foundation's UEFI/SecureBoot plans, they're outlined here.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  2. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  3. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
  4. AMD Radeon Gallium3D More Competitive With Catalyst On Linux
Latest Software Articles
  1. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  2. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  3. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
  4. Previewing The Radeon Gallium3D Shader Optimizations
Latest Linux News
  1. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed With
  2. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
  3. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
  4. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks For Intel Ivy Bridge
  5. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No Longer Fit
  6. Firefox 22 Beta Enables WebRTC Support
  7. OpenSUSE 13.1 Milestone 1 Released
  8. DRM Graphics Driver Comes For Dove/Cubox
  9. JADE: An LLVM-Based Video Decoder For MPEG RVC
  10. Ubuntu 13.10 Likely Switching To Chromium Browser
  11. Unity 7, Compiz To Be Polished For Ubuntu 13.10
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Unity 8, Mir To Be Experimental Choice In Ubuntu...
  2. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No...
  3. Greater Radeon Gallium3D Shader Optimization Tests
  4. Kubuntu, KDE Has Little Hope For Ubuntu's Mir
  5. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  6. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed...
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite