Linux Foundation Struggles With Microsoft UEFI Signing

Posted by Michael Larabel on November 20, 2012

James Bottomley has written about the problems being faced by the Linux Foundation in having a Microsoft-approved validly-signed UEFI pre-bootloader.

There's many hurdles to jump from Microsoft and Verisign/Symantec for obtaining a valid signing key. There's third-party open-source tools for handling much of the signing process, but in the end Windows is still needed due to a Silverlight-based file uploader for the UEFI binary. The Mono-based Moonlight doesn't work with the Silverlight uploader. After uploading the cabinet file for signing, there's a seven-stage process.

Unfortunately, it's with this seven-stage process on Microsoft's end is where the Linux Foundation binary is stuck. "I’m still not sure what the actual problem is, but if you look at the Subject of the signing key, there’s nothing in the signing key to indicate the Linux Foundation, therefore I suspect the problem is that the binary is signed with a generic Microsoft key instead of a specific (and revocable) key tied to the Linux Foundation."

Bottomley ends with, "We’re still waiting for Microsoft to give the Linux Foundation a validly signed pre-bootloader. When that happens, it will get uploaded to the Linux Foundation website for all to use." The full status can be read on his blog.

For those not familiar with the Linux Foundation's UEFI/SecureBoot plans, they're outlined here.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  2. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  3. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  4. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
Latest Linux News
  1. Jolla Announces Their First Phone
  2. Mageia 3 Released, Still Using Legacy GRUB
  3. NetBSD 6.1 Brings In More Features
  4. Using Six Monitors With AMD's Open-Source Linux Driver
  5. Benchmarking The Intel P-State, CPUfreq Changes
  6. FreeBSD Still Working On Next-Gen Package Manager
  7. DNF Still Advancing As Experimental Yum For Fedora
  8. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  9. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed With
  10. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
  11. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Jolla Announces Their First Phone
  2. Radeon Gallium3D Gets Important Cayman Fixes
  3. Ubuntu Looks Towards MySQL Alternatives
  4. Mageia 3 Released, Still Using Legacy GRUB
  5. DRM Moves Ahead With HTML5 Specification
  6. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite