LLVM Seeks New Code Owners

Posted by Michael Larabel on November 12, 2012

At Chris Lattner's keynote for the LLVM Developers' Conference that took place last week in California, he called for more "code owners" within the LLVM code-base.

LLVM code owners are basically to be like Linux kernel sub-system and driver maintainers within the Linux kernel where they are responsible for the code's well being, documentation, and general point-of-contact for a defined area of the code-base.

The topic of code ownership within LLVM is now being discussed on the LLVM developers' list now that developers are beginning to apply for ownership. A developer from Arxan, a software security company, was first to step up and proposed taping ownership of LLVM's Bitcode as the company has a vested interest in its future. The developer, Joe Abbey, proposed taking over Bitcode ownership in terms of documenting the implementation and responsibility for reviewing patches and code commits. He also wants to take responsibility for the code quality and maintenance.

Chris Lattner already responded in approval of this particular Bitcode owner and he also followed-up to say that he thinks "directory level" ownership is the right granularity.

Questions have now arose and are being discussed over requirements for code ownership, etc. We'll see how it pans all out as the mailing list discussion is still ongoing. These independent code owners might also help to quelch concerns by some individuals that LLVM is too much under the control of Apple.

More information on LLVM developer policies at present are available within the LLVM documentation.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  2. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  3. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
  4. AMD Radeon Gallium3D More Competitive With Catalyst On Linux
Latest Software Articles
  1. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  2. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  3. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
  4. Previewing The Radeon Gallium3D Shader Optimizations
Latest Linux News
  1. DNF Still Advancing As Experimental Yum For Fedora
  2. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  3. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed With
  4. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
  5. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
  6. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks For Intel Ivy Bridge
  7. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No Longer Fit
  8. Firefox 22 Beta Enables WebRTC Support
  9. OpenSUSE 13.1 Milestone 1 Released
  10. DRM Graphics Driver Comes For Dove/Cubox
  11. JADE: An LLVM-Based Video Decoder For MPEG RVC
Latest Forum Talk
  1. DNF Still Advancing As Experimental Yum For Fedora
  2. Greater Radeon Gallium3D Shader Optimization Tests
  3. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No...
  4. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  5. Logitech supports linux!
  6. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed...
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite