1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

Ubuntu Still Unsure On Using XZ Packages

Ubuntu

Published on 01 November 2012 11:06 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Ubuntu
19 Comments

While Fedora has been using XZ-compressed packages for their RPMs for a while now with having a greater compression ratio than Gzip, Ubuntu developers remain unsure of switching to using XZ compression for the Ubuntu 13.04 release.

As wrote about earlier this month, Ubuntu developers planned to bring up an XZ discussion at UDS. The discussion happened today in Copenhagen, but there was no definitive conclusion about moving from Gzip to XZ compression for their Debian packages in the next release.

XZ offers a better compression ratio than Gzip and some other compression alternatives, which would mean the DEB packages are smaller in size. This smaller size would benefit end-users in having a shorter download time and burn through less bandwidth in obtaining new/updated packages. Ubuntu mirrors would also save space, albeit this isn't one of their principal reasons for wanting to switch to XZ compression.

Concerned raised about using XZ packages is that Debian hasn't yet switched their packaging to XZ (though they eventually plan to) and potentially greater CPU and memory usage with extracting XZ-compressed packages. The primary concern expressed is that if it takes significantly longer to decompress XZ packages on some hardware, this may hold back their adoption of the new compression scheme. If it takes measurably more time in the end to decompress and install the packages while factoring in a shorter download time, their XZ plans will be aborted for Ubuntu 13.04.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux News
  1. Btrfs In Linux 4.2 Brings Quota Updates, Many Fixes
  2. Latest Rumor Pegs Microsoft Wanting To Buy AMD
  3. The Next-Gen Phoronix Site Experience Is Almost Ready
  4. Exciting Features Merged So Far For The Linux 4.2 Kernel
  5. Mesa 10.6.1 Brings A Bug-Fix For Dota 2 Reborn
  6. DragonFlyBSD 4.2 Released: Brings Improved Graphics & New Compiler
  7. Wine-Staging 1.7.46 Improves The OS X Experience
  8. The State & Complications Of Porting The Unity Editor To Linux
  9. Libreboot Now Supports An AMD/ASUS Motherboard
  10. SafeStack Merged Into LLVM To Protect Against Stack Buffer Overflow Attacks
Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. How KDE VDG Is Trying To Make Open-Source Software Beautiful
  2. Attempting To Try Out BCache On The Linux 4.1 Kernel
  3. CompuLab's Fitlet Is A Very Tiny, Fanless, Linux PC With AMD A10 Micro
  4. AMD A10-7870K Godavari: RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Linux Drivers
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Linus Is Looking Forward To Merging KDBUS, But Not Convinced By Performance
  2. Kubuntu 15.10 Could Be The End Of The Road
  3. NVIDIA Starts Supplying Open-Source Hardware Reference Headers
  4. KDBUS Won't Be Pushed Until The Linux 4.3 Kernel
  5. Linux 4.2 Kernel Gets Port To New Processor Architecture
  6. EXT4 Has Many Cleanups & Fixes For Linux 4.2
  7. The Staging Pull For Linux 4.2: "Big, Really Big"
  8. SteamOS "Brewmaster" Is Valve's New Debian 8.1 Based Version