China Makes A Java Version Of Core LLVM

Posted by Michael Larabel on October 19, 2012

Developers at a university in China have developed their own Java version of LLVM. Their reasoning for re-implementing LLVM is that they prefer Java to the C++ language.

Students created JLLVM, which is just a Java version of LLVM core. Why did they came up with their own Java-brewed version of LLVM? "Our motivation is simple: The LLVM project is a great job. But it is for C++ developers. *It's difficult for Java developers to analysis LLVM IR* (intermediate representation). So we build a project use Java to implement a LLVM Core so that we can analysis LLVM IR with Java."

So far though not many people have been interested in this Java version of LLVM based upon the limited responses over the past two weeks to its mailing list announcement.

The announcement went on to say, "The core technique is ANTLR. We use ANTLR to recognize LLVM IR and generate parser. And the Java class is organized as the official LLVM core of C++ version. We only implement several necessary feature of LLVM and we will keep on this work if some else like our project."

JLLVM uses "ANother Tool for Language Recognition" as its parser for going through the LLVM intermediate representation. The LLVM elements are then stored in a Java class. "At present, JLLVM has all the features needed to analysis LLVM IR. As LLVM is a large project and we need more time to complete some other feature and make JLLVM more easier to use."

For those interested in more information about this Java implementation of LLVM can find out additional details from the university's web-site.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  2. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  3. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
  4. AMD Radeon Gallium3D More Competitive With Catalyst On Linux
Latest Software Articles
  1. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  2. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  3. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
  4. Previewing The Radeon Gallium3D Shader Optimizations
Latest Linux News
  1. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed With
  2. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
  3. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
  4. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks For Intel Ivy Bridge
  5. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No Longer Fit
  6. Firefox 22 Beta Enables WebRTC Support
  7. OpenSUSE 13.1 Milestone 1 Released
  8. DRM Graphics Driver Comes For Dove/Cubox
  9. JADE: An LLVM-Based Video Decoder For MPEG RVC
  10. Ubuntu 13.10 Likely Switching To Chromium Browser
  11. Unity 7, Compiz To Be Polished For Ubuntu 13.10
Latest Forum Talk
  1. KDE's Krita Ported To OpenGL 3.1, OpenGL ES 2.0
  2. Ubuntu 13.10 Likely Switching To Chromium Browser
  3. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  4. Features Being Developed For KDE 4.11 Desktop
  5. Left 4 Dead 2 Beta Surfaces For Linux Gamers
  6. Unity 8, Mir To Be Experimental Choice In Ubuntu...
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite