1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Benchmarking The Ubuntu "Low-Jitter" Linux Kernel

Ubuntu

Published on 15 October 2012 02:39 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Ubuntu
162 Comments

There's an independently maintained "low-jitter" version of the Linux kernel targeting Ubuntu, which claims to be faster, but is that really the case?

In response to the recent Linux 3.7 + Mesa 9.1-devel Running On Ubuntu 12.10 article, a Phoronix reader was quick to promote his specially-configured kernel for Ubuntu.

Said across several messages within the forums, "[Doom 3] runs really really well on my low-jitter kernel, with the closed source drivers though... You can play doom3 at 36 fps? Not really. You can get an idea of it, but the exhilaration of low-jitter 72fps it will not have...Even my mac mini from 2010 plays HL2 ep2 well, and that is much newer. Thats an nvidia 320m processor. (2.4ghz core2duo). Carmack says doom 3 still stresses a lot of hardware, because of the 3 passes he uses to render stuff. Which is also why I linked to my low-jitter kernel, because it runs doom 3 well. (Better than windows)."

The Linux user and Phoronix reader, Uwaysi Bin Kareem, describes his low-jitter kernel for Ubuntu 12.04 LTS as "A lot of Linux-distros use the standard config, or close. Unfortunately the standard config, is neither specialised for desktop, or server. It is somewhere between, a kind of political standpoint, not siding with either camp. Also debugging is usually left on, and low-latency kernel-variants of ubuntu, still are not agressively tuned towards low os-jitter. What that means is that these distros will perform much poorer on the desktop than it can. And that includes the most popular distro “Ubuntu” which I use. However compiling ones own kernel for it, really gets it to the performance one would want."

To see whether this third-party low-jitter kernel for Ubuntu Linux is any faster, I ran some of the common Phoronix Test Suite tests with OpenBenchmarking.org integration on his Linux 3.5.4 low-jitter kernel and compared it to the mainline Linux 3.5.4 kernel as offered from the Ubuntu Mainline PPA. Benchmarking was from an Intel Core i7 laptop with NVIDIA graphics and using the proprietary driver.

Benchmark results in full along with all of the system details can be found in OpenBenchmarking.org's 1210149-RA-LOWJITTER02 result file. Below are just a couple of the interesting results.

For most of the Linux benchmarks between these two kernels, there isn't much to see...

In some tests, the low-jitter kernel is actually a bit slower than the generic/mainline kernel from the 3.5.4 code-base.

It isn't particularly exciting.

Of the many benchmarks run, the only big win for the Ubuntu low-jitter kernel was found when running the PostgreSQL database server.

However, low-jitter isn't really good for all server workloads since it sharply loses out in the Apache web server benchmark.

Continue to OpenBenchmarking.org for the rest of the Linux kernel benchmarks plus other kernel data.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Ubuntu vs. Fedora Linux On Lenovo's X1 Carbon With Core i7 Broadwell
  2. Ubuntu 15.04 Is The Easy Path To Better Performance On Intel Broadwell
  3. NVIDIA's Latest Maxwell Line-Up Against AMD With Catalyst On Linux
  4. Preliminary Tests Of Intel Sandy Bridge & Ivy Bridge vs. Broadwell
  5. AMD FX-8320E Performance On Linux
  6. Linux Compiler Benchmarks Of LLVM Clang 3.5 vs. LLVM Clang 3.6-rc1
Latest Linux News
  1. DNF Plugins Extend The Functionality Of Fedora's Yum Successor
  2. LibreOffice 4.4 Released With Better OOXML Support, UI Improvements
  3. Inkscape 0.91 Goes Through C++ Code Conversion, New Cairo Rendering, OpenMP Filters
  4. New Mesa Patch To Improve CPU-Bound Applications
  5. LLVM Adds Options To Do Fuzz Testing
  6. Coreboot Now Supports Another Dual-Socket AMD Motherboard
  7. Atomic Mode-Setting/Display Support Progresses In Linux 3.20
  8. NVIDIA 340.76 Brings Three Stable Fixes
  9. Intel Broadwell-U P-State vs. ACPI CPUFreq Scaling Linux Performance
  10. DragonFlyBSD Is Almost To Linux 3.10 Era Intel Graphics Support
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. PlayStation 4 System Compiler Support Landing In LLVM
  2. LibreOffice 4.4 Is Coming Soon With New Features
  3. Linux "GHOST" Vulnerability Hits Glibc Systems
  4. My Initial Intel Broadwell Linux Experience With The ThinkPad X1 Carbon
  5. Broadwell Linux Ultrabook Running MUCH Cooler Than Haswell
  6. LZHAM 1.0 Lossless Data Compression Codec Released
  7. Linux Users Upset By Chromium's Busted HiDPI Support
  8. Interstellar Marines On Linux With Catalyst: Bull S*#@