1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Benchmarking The Ubuntu "Low-Jitter" Linux Kernel

Ubuntu

Published on 15 October 2012 02:39 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Ubuntu
162 Comments

There's an independently maintained "low-jitter" version of the Linux kernel targeting Ubuntu, which claims to be faster, but is that really the case?

In response to the recent Linux 3.7 + Mesa 9.1-devel Running On Ubuntu 12.10 article, a Phoronix reader was quick to promote his specially-configured kernel for Ubuntu.

Said across several messages within the forums, "[Doom 3] runs really really well on my low-jitter kernel, with the closed source drivers though... You can play doom3 at 36 fps? Not really. You can get an idea of it, but the exhilaration of low-jitter 72fps it will not have...Even my mac mini from 2010 plays HL2 ep2 well, and that is much newer. Thats an nvidia 320m processor. (2.4ghz core2duo). Carmack says doom 3 still stresses a lot of hardware, because of the 3 passes he uses to render stuff. Which is also why I linked to my low-jitter kernel, because it runs doom 3 well. (Better than windows)."

The Linux user and Phoronix reader, Uwaysi Bin Kareem, describes his low-jitter kernel for Ubuntu 12.04 LTS as "A lot of Linux-distros use the standard config, or close. Unfortunately the standard config, is neither specialised for desktop, or server. It is somewhere between, a kind of political standpoint, not siding with either camp. Also debugging is usually left on, and low-latency kernel-variants of ubuntu, still are not agressively tuned towards low os-jitter. What that means is that these distros will perform much poorer on the desktop than it can. And that includes the most popular distro “Ubuntu” which I use. However compiling ones own kernel for it, really gets it to the performance one would want."

To see whether this third-party low-jitter kernel for Ubuntu Linux is any faster, I ran some of the common Phoronix Test Suite tests with OpenBenchmarking.org integration on his Linux 3.5.4 low-jitter kernel and compared it to the mainline Linux 3.5.4 kernel as offered from the Ubuntu Mainline PPA. Benchmarking was from an Intel Core i7 laptop with NVIDIA graphics and using the proprietary driver.

Benchmark results in full along with all of the system details can be found in OpenBenchmarking.org's 1210149-RA-LOWJITTER02 result file. Below are just a couple of the interesting results.

For most of the Linux benchmarks between these two kernels, there isn't much to see...

In some tests, the low-jitter kernel is actually a bit slower than the generic/mainline kernel from the 3.5.4 code-base.

It isn't particularly exciting.

Of the many benchmarks run, the only big win for the Ubuntu low-jitter kernel was found when running the PostgreSQL database server.

However, low-jitter isn't really good for all server workloads since it sharply loses out in the Apache web server benchmark.

Continue to OpenBenchmarking.org for the rest of the Linux kernel benchmarks plus other kernel data.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Preview: AMD's FX-9590 Eight-Core At Up To 5.0GHz On Linux
  2. Intel Launches The Core i7 5960X, Mighty Powerful Haswell-E CPUs
  3. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
  4. AMD Radeon R9 290 Open-Source Driver Works, But Has A Ways To Go
Latest Linux Articles
  1. How Intel Graphics On Linux Compare To Open-Source AMD/NVIDIA Drivers
  2. The Fastest NVIDIA GPUs For Open-Source Nouveau With Steam Linux Gaming
  3. Testing For The Latest Linux Kernel Power Regression
  4. The Most Energy Efficient Radeon GPU For AMD Linux Gaming
Latest Linux News
  1. Nouveau X.Org Driver Released With DRI3+Present, Maxwell, GLAMOR
  2. Microsoft & AMD Release C++ AMP Compiler With Linux Support
  3. AMD, Wine & Valve Dominated August For Linux Users
  4. Linux 3.17-rc3 Kernel Released Back On Schedule
  5. Lennart Poettering Talks Up His New Linux Vision That Involves Btrfs
  6. Mesa 10.3 RC2 Arrives Via Its New Release Manager
  7. Ubuntu 14.10's Lack Of X.Org Server 1.16 Gets Blamed On AMD
  8. MSI Motherboard BIOS Updating Remains A Pain For Linux Users
  9. See How Your Linux System Performs Against The Latest Intel/AMD CPUs
  10. AMD Steppe Eagle Flys To Coreboot
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Lennart Poettering Talks Up His New Linux Vision That Involves Btrfs
  2. The dangers of Linux kernel development
  3. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  4. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  5. SSD seems slow
  6. Is laptop with Intel CPU and AMD dGPU worth buying considering especially AMD Enduro?
  7. Radeon HD5670 and Ubuntu 14.04
  8. Btrfs Gets Talked Up, Googler Encourages You To Try Btrfs