Linux Foundation Comes Up With SecureBoot Plan

Posted by Michael Larabel on October 10, 2012

The Linux Foundation has shared their plan for how they intend to deal with UEFI SecureBoot for running Linux on PCs that have this Microsoft-pushed feature for trying to secure the system boot process.

James Bottomley has shared the LF UEFI SecureBoot plan on the behalf of the Linux Foundation and its Technical Advisory Board. The plans were shared via his blog and effectively comes down to: "The Linux Foundation will obtain a Microsoft Key and sign a small pre-bootloader which will, in turn, chain load (without any form of signature check) a predesignated boot loader which will, in turn, boot Linux (or any other operating system). The pre-bootloader will employ a “present user” test to ensure that it cannot be used as a vector for any type of UEFI malware to target secure systems. This pre-bootloader can be used either to boot a CD/DVD installer or LiveCD distribution or even boot an installed operating system in secure mode for any distribution that chooses to use it."

As soon as the Linux Foundation is able to obtain a SecureBoot key from Microsoft, they will release this new pre-bootloader on their web-site.

Bottomley adds, "The current pre-bootloader is designed as an enabler only in that, by breaking the security verification chain at the actual bootloader, it provides no security enhancements over booting linux with UEFI secure boot turned off. Its sole purpose is to allow Linux to continue to boot on platforms that come by default with secure boot enabled."

"It is designed to be as small as possible, leaving all the work to the real bootloader. The real bootloader must be installed on the same partition as the pre-bootloader with the known path loader.efi (although the binary may be any bootloader including Grub2). The pre-bootloader will attempt to execute this binary and, if that succeeds, the system will boot normally." The source to this UEFI SecureBoot pre-bootloader is currently available, but not exactly useful until the Linux Foundation receives its proper key.

Meanwhile, Ubuntu already has their own SecureBoot plans and other distributions have also been brewing their own plans.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  2. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  3. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
  4. Previewing The Radeon Gallium3D Shader Optimizations
Latest Linux News
  1. DNF Still Advancing As Experimental Yum For Fedora
  2. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  3. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed With
  4. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
  5. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
  6. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks For Intel Ivy Bridge
  7. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No Longer Fit
  8. Firefox 22 Beta Enables WebRTC Support
  9. OpenSUSE 13.1 Milestone 1 Released
  10. DRM Graphics Driver Comes For Dove/Cubox
  11. JADE: An LLVM-Based Video Decoder For MPEG RVC
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Logitech supports linux!
  2. OpenSUSE Considers Replacing LXDE With E17
  3. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  4. DRM Moves Ahead With HTML5 Specification
  5. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No...
  6. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite