1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Starch Linux: OpenBSD Atop Arch's Linux Kernel

Operating Systems

Published on 25 January 2013 01:04 AM EST
Written by Michael Larabel in Operating Systems
54 Comments

Earlier this week I wrote about Arch BSD: a new operating system that is based upon Arch Linux but in place of the Linux kernel is FreeBSD's kernel. To talk about today is Starch Linux, a distribution also derived from Arch but its approach is the opposite. Starch Linux still runs off Arch's Linux kernel but it has an OpenBSD user-space.

A Phoronix reader brought up Starch Linux in the Arch BSD discussion as basically being a reverse implementation. Starch Linux is basically OpenBSD atop the Linux kernel where as Arch BSD is Arch atop the FreeBSD kernel. Aside from pulling in the OpenBSD packages, differing it further is that it uses the musl libc standard library.

The musl standard library is designed to be lightweight, fast, simple, free, and provide proper standard-conformance and safety. The musl library is lighter than uclibc and eglibc while competitive with dietlibc. The performance of musl is also known to be quite good compared to the alternative standard libraries.

At the moment there is no official Starch Linux installer but rather users must install Arch Linux and then modify their pacman package manager configuration to point towards the Starch Linux mirrors to install their core and extra packages.

While not yet distributed as its full, own operating system, Starch Linux is nearing the point of its own self-hosted build.

More information on this interesting OpenBSD/Linux distribution can be found at StarchLinux.org.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
  2. CompuLab Intense-PC2: An Excellent, Fanless, Mini PC Powered By Intel's i7 Haswell
  3. From The Atom 330 To Haswell ULT: Intel Linux Performance Benchmarks
  4. AMD Radeon R9 285 Tonga Performance On Linux
Latest Linux Articles
  1. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Linux Desktop Benchmarks
  2. Ubuntu 14.10 XMir System Compositor Benchmarks
  3. Btrfs RAID HDD Testing On Ubuntu Linux 14.10
  4. Ubuntu 14.10 Linux 32-bit vs. 64-bit Performance
Latest Linux News
  1. Coreboot Now Has Support For Intel Broadwell Hardware
  2. Enlightenment's EFL 1.12 Alpha Has Evas GL-DRM Engine, OpenGL ES 1.1 Support
  3. GTK+ Lands Experimental Backend For Mir Display Server
  4. Ubuntu 14.10 Officially Released
  5. Mesa 10.4 Might Re-Enable HyperZ For R600g/RadeonSI
  6. Intel GVT-g GPU Virtualization Moves Closer
  7. GTK+ 3.16 To Bring Several New Features
  8. Debian 8.0 Jessie Has Many Multimedia Improvements
  9. What Linux Benchmarks Would You Like To See Next?
  10. Open-Source, Linux Support For Corsair Link Devices Slowly Materializing
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Linux hacker compares Solaris kernel code:
  2. Advertisements On Phoronix
  3. HOPE: The Ease Of Python With The Speed Of C++
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. Users/Developers Threatening Fork Of Debian GNU/Linux
  6. Ubuntu 16.04 Might Be The Distribution's Last 32-Bit Release
  7. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  8. Proof that strlcpy is un-needed