1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

NVIDIA 313.09 Linux GPU Driver Benchmarks

NVIDIA

Published on 16 December 2012 03:45 PM EST
Written by Michael Larabel in NVIDIA
Comment On This Article

This week the NVIDIA Linux developers released the NVIDIA 313.09 Beta Linux graphics driver. This driver packs in many new features so some early benchmarks of this first 313.xx Linux driver release have already been carried out.

The NVIDIA 313.09 Beta advertises some performance improvements for specific functions, picks up support for a few new GLX extensions, and most notably handles the GLX_EXT_buffer_age extension. This new driver paired with the experimental Compiz packages are supposed to yield new levels of Linux gaming performance.

In this weekend benchmarking, the NVIDIA 313.09 Beta was benchmarked against the NVIDIA 310.19 stable Linux graphics driver. The compositing window manager impact though isn't being compared for this quick testing but just the overall impact of the NVIDIA 313.xx driver compared to the current 310.xx driver series. As such, the Xfce 4.10 desktop was used without compositing. The graphics card for this brief testing was a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Kepler.

The results in full along with all of the system logs and other hardware/software information for this two-way NVIDIA binary blob comparison can be found on OpenBenchmarking.org. For the common OpenGL Linux benchmarks from the GeForce GTX 680 with this beta driver update, there isn't much to see in terms of raw performance changes. Stay tuned though for the more thorough Compiz benchmarking.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  2. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
  3. AMD A10-7800 & A6-7400K APUs Run Great On Linux
  4. Radeon Gallium3D Is Running Increasingly Well Against AMD's Catalyst Driver
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Radeon Graphics Yield Mixed Results With Linux 3.17 Kernel
  2. AMD's RadeonSI Driver Sped Up A Lot This Summer
  3. Intel's Latest Linux Graphics Code Competes Against OS X 10.9
  4. Intel Sandy Bridge Gets A Surprise Boost From Linux 3.17
Latest Linux News
  1. Preview Of AMD Radeon R9 290 Hawaii Open-Source Performance
  2. Intel Bay Trail Performance With Linux 3.16/3.17 & Mesa 10.3
  3. EFL Sees A Ton Of Work Following Recent v1.11 Release
  4. ARM Talks Up Wayland For Mali
  5. GNOME/GTK+ Human Interface Guidelines Updated
  6. Robocraft Is Rolling Over To Linux
  7. The Widely-Criticized New Commercial Linux Distro Is Now On Kickstarter
  8. Wayland & Weston 1.6 Alpha Released
  9. A New First-Person Mystery Game Might Be Coming To Linux
  10. Patch By Patch, LLVM Clang Gets Better At Building The Linux Kernel
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Btrfs Gets Talked Up, Googler Encourages You To Try Btrfs
  2. Systemd 216 Piles On More Features, Aims For New User-Space VT
  3. OSS radeon driver for A10-7850K (Kaveri)
  4. Could be avoid to use flash for show the benchmark on the articles?
  5. American Citizens running AMOK for food stamps
  6. What Linux Distribution Should Be Benchmarked The Most?
  7. Company I work for is looking to contribute to Open Source projects... but wrongly?
  8. Microsoft vs. Campaign