FUSE Gets I/O Performance Improvements

Posted by Michael Larabel on December 15, 2012

The FUSE module, which allows for file-systems to be run from user-space, can now process direct I/O a-synchronously. This a-synchronous direct I/O can lead to very noticeable performance improvements for FUSE-based file-systems like ZFS.

One of the most common complaints about the FUSE project for running file-systems in user-space has been the poor performance. While using FUSE leads to portability between operating systems, simplified file-system implementations, pushing file-systems that would not be allowed in the GPL-licensed Linux kernel, and a stable API, the performance has always been a problem compared to file-systems natively implemented within the Linux kernel.

There have been FUSE performance improvements over the years, but it's still an active complaint. Linus Torvalds called FUSE a toy and for misguided people. The latest I/O performance improvement for FUSE is being able to process direct I/O a-synchronously.

Maxim Patlasov submitted a set of six patches for allowing the direct I/O to be done a-synchronously rather than synchronously as it's done currently.
Existing fuse implementation always processes direct IO synchronously: it submits next request to userspace fuse only when previous is completed. This is suboptimal because: 1) libaio DIO works in blocking way; 2) userspace fuse can't achieve parallelism processing several requests simultaneously (e.g. in case of distributed network storage); 3) userspace fuse can't merge requests before passing it to actual storage.

The idea of the patch-set is to submit fuse requests in non-blocking way (where it's possible) and either return -EIOCBQUEUED or wait for their completion synchronously. The patch-set to be applied on top of for-next of Miklos' git repo.
Performance tests done by the patch-set's author show the dd read speeds on FUSE going up by 19%, dd writes going up by about 4%, AIO-Stress reads going up by 21%, and AIO-Stress writes increasing by 11%.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 vs. AMD Radeon Graphics On Linux
  2. Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 Performance On Ubuntu Linux
  3. Intel Core i7 4770K "Haswell" Benchmarks On Ubuntu Linux
  4. The First Experience Of Intel Haswell On Linux
Latest Software Articles
  1. Optimized Binaries Provide Great Benefits For Intel Haswell
  2. 11-Way Linux, BSD Platform Comparison
  3. SNA Acceleration Works Great For Intel Core i7 Haswell
  4. The Linux Evolution For Intel Haswell's Performance
Latest Linux News
  1. KDE's KWin Made Lots Of Progress In 4.11
  2. Ubuntu Announces Carrier Advisory Group
  3. Qt 5.1 Release Candidate 1 Has Arrived
  4. In-Fighting Continues Over Mir On Non-Unity Ubuntu
  5. Subversion 1.8 Presents New Features
  6. LLVM 3.3 Officially Released
  7. LLVM/Clang Now Uses Loop Vectorizer At New Levels
  8. Intel GPU Driver Tries To Rip Out FBDEV Support
  9. Coreboot Doing AMD USB 3.0, Q35 QEMU Emulation
  10. VP9 Codec Now Enabled By Default In Chrome
  11. openSUSE 13.1 M2 Plays On PulseAudio 4.0
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Planetary Annihilation Plans To Come To Linux
  2. Benchmarks Of NVIDIA's New Linux GPU Driver
  3. Intel GPU Driver Tries To Rip Out FBDEV Support
  4. In-Fighting Continues Over Mir On Non-Unity Ubuntu
  5. Commodity Tips
  6. I got robbed at gunpoint today....
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite