FUSE Gets I/O Performance Improvements

Posted by Michael Larabel on December 15, 2012

The FUSE module, which allows for file-systems to be run from user-space, can now process direct I/O a-synchronously. This a-synchronous direct I/O can lead to very noticeable performance improvements for FUSE-based file-systems like ZFS.

One of the most common complaints about the FUSE project for running file-systems in user-space has been the poor performance. While using FUSE leads to portability between operating systems, simplified file-system implementations, pushing file-systems that would not be allowed in the GPL-licensed Linux kernel, and a stable API, the performance has always been a problem compared to file-systems natively implemented within the Linux kernel.

There have been FUSE performance improvements over the years, but it's still an active complaint. Linus Torvalds called FUSE a toy and for misguided people. The latest I/O performance improvement for FUSE is being able to process direct I/O a-synchronously.

Maxim Patlasov submitted a set of six patches for allowing the direct I/O to be done a-synchronously rather than synchronously as it's done currently.
Existing fuse implementation always processes direct IO synchronously: it submits next request to userspace fuse only when previous is completed. This is suboptimal because: 1) libaio DIO works in blocking way; 2) userspace fuse can't achieve parallelism processing several requests simultaneously (e.g. in case of distributed network storage); 3) userspace fuse can't merge requests before passing it to actual storage.

The idea of the patch-set is to submit fuse requests in non-blocking way (where it's possible) and either return -EIOCBQUEUED or wait for their completion synchronously. The patch-set to be applied on top of for-next of Miklos' git repo.
Performance tests done by the patch-set's author show the dd read speeds on FUSE going up by 19%, dd writes going up by about 4%, AIO-Stress reads going up by 21%, and AIO-Stress writes increasing by 11%.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  2. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  3. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  4. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
Latest Linux News
  1. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  2. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
  3. Wayland's Weston Gets Output Scaling Support
  4. Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer
  5. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  6. Intel Ultrabook Performance Is Faster With Mesa 9.2
  7. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
  8. Phoronix Test Suite 4.6.0 "Utsira" Released
  9. New Intel X.Org Driver Supports All Of Haswell
  10. SQLite Now Faster With Memory Mapped I/O
  11. Microsoft Releases Skype For Linux 4.2, Has Bug-Fixes
Latest Forum Talk
  1. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
  2. Fedora 18 Comes To ARMv6, Raspberry Pi
  3. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. Microsoft Releases Skype For Linux 4.2, Has...
  6. Radeon 7770 Can't reclock crash kernel
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite