The Cortex-A15 Continues Running Strong On Linux

Posted by Michael Larabel on December 09, 2012

Over the past several weeks of running the Samsung Chromebook with its Exynos 5 Dual SoC that is comprised of an ARM Cortex-A15 dual-core processor, I've grown quite fond of this latest ARM processor.

In the compiler benchmarks and extensively comparing it to the NVIDIA Tegra 3 and Intel x86 CPUs, the ARM Cortex-A15 has held its grown and competed very well. The A15 blows away the older Cortex-A9s and ARM's claims that it's 40% faster core-for-core clock-for-clock than the A9 is not just marketing fluff.

The Exynos 5 Dual is clocked at 1.7GHz with two cores while I'm quite looking forward to NVIDIA's Tegra 4 "Wayne" that will be quad-core up to 2.0GHz when they debut early next year along with a better NVIDIA GPU integrated onto the SoC. There's also the Texas Instruments OMAP5 chips that are expected to run at 2.0GHz but will be packing just two cores and sticking to PowerVR graphics.

Anyhow, for those interested in more ARM Linux benchmarks, specifically on Ubuntu, I've made some more results available this weekend. This latest round of ARM performance benchmarks are from the Samsung Chromebook with its Exynos 5 Dual while still comparing it to the NVIDIA Tegra 3 "Cardhu" tablet quad-core. What's different this time around besides new and different benchmarks is that both Ubuntu 12.04 and Ubuntu 12.10 were tested on the Tegra 3. There's still the same kernel that's flashed onto the NVIDIA tablet, but the user-land is updated for Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal to provide another data point.

If you want to see how your x86 or ARM Linux device compares to the NVIDIA Tegra tablet and Samsung Chromebook, it's simply a matter of installing the Phoronix Test Suite and then executing phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1212087-RA-TEGRACORT38 to conduct a fully automated side-by-side comparison.

Embedded below are some of the highlights from this latest ARM Cortex-A15 Linux benchmarking while all of the results and other system data in full is available from this OpenBenchmarking.org result file.

Continue to OpenBenchmarking.org for the rest.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  2. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  3. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
  4. AMD Radeon Gallium3D More Competitive With Catalyst On Linux
Latest Software Articles
  1. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  2. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  3. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
  4. Previewing The Radeon Gallium3D Shader Optimizations
Latest Linux News
  1. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed With
  2. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
  3. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
  4. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks For Intel Ivy Bridge
  5. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No Longer Fit
  6. Firefox 22 Beta Enables WebRTC Support
  7. OpenSUSE 13.1 Milestone 1 Released
  8. DRM Graphics Driver Comes For Dove/Cubox
  9. JADE: An LLVM-Based Video Decoder For MPEG RVC
  10. Ubuntu 13.10 Likely Switching To Chromium Browser
  11. Unity 7, Compiz To Be Polished For Ubuntu 13.10
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No...
  2. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed...
  3. Kubuntu, KDE Has Little Hope For Ubuntu's Mir
  4. OpenSUSE Considers Replacing LXDE With E17
  5. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  6. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite