1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The Future Of Fedora Gets Debated, Again

Fedora

Published on 09 December 2012 03:08 AM EST
Written by Michael Larabel in Fedora
33 Comments

Being hotly discussed this weekend within the Fedora development camp is in regards to the future direction of the Linux distribution.

Tomas Radej, a developer at Red Hat issuing a statement from the position of a Fedora contributor/community member rather than his employer, volleyed a long message on the Fedora devel list about "where are we going?"

Radej has witnessed that most of the Fedora mailing list discussions end up degrading into scolding and personal insults rather than accepting constructive criticism, which he views as making Fedora increasingly fragmented and inconsistent. He also relays views that Fedora may be fantastic for pushing along new, bleeding-edge Linux features, but the community-based distribution just doesn't work. Radej writes, "I am just worrying that if there is no change in how Fedora is done, it will be harder and harder for the community to thrive, and I wouldn't like that. So, through this e-mail addressed to all the Fedora community, I am seeking support for a movement, both collective and individual, that would improve communication, cooperation and generally the life of Fedora on the most fundamental basis."

Some users on the list were quick to chime in that there should be a "Fedora LTS" release to provide longer term support and stability for certain releases rather than constantly pushing out major updates every 6~12 months. For those wanting stability, there is Red Hat Enterprise Linux (and its derivatives like Scientific Linux and CentOS), but others responded to that in that those enterprise Linux distributions don't often have the very latest software.

Other pain points expressed about Fedora come down to the usual API/ABI breakage and there not being stability/persistence/sustainability at the user-interface level between releases.

While there's been about four dozen messages in this thread since Friday, there's no clear consensus with - as usual - most factions just attacking the other factions' views.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Mini-Box M350: A Simple, Affordable Mini-ITX Case
  2. Overclocking The AMD AM1 Athlon & Sempron APUs
  3. AMD Athlon 5350 / 5150 & Sempron 3850 / 2650
  4. Upgraded Kernel & Mesa Yield A Big Boost For Athlon R3 Graphics
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Ubuntu 12.04.4 vs. 13.10 vs. 14.04 LTS Desktop Benchmarks
  2. AMD OpenCL Performance With AM1 Kabini APUs
  3. A Quick Look At GCC 4.9 vs. LLVM Clang 3.5
  4. Are AMD Athlon/Sempron APUs Fast Enough For Steam On Linux?
Latest Linux News
  1. Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" Officially Released
  2. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS vs. 14.04 LTS Server Benchmarks
  3. QEMU 2.0 Released With ARM, x86 Enhancements
  4. Running The Unity 8 Preview Session On Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
  5. R600 Gallium3D Disables LLVM Back-End By Default
  6. Fedora 21 Gets GNOME 3.12, PHP 5.6, Mono 3.4
  7. Fedora Workstation Is Making Me Quite Excited
  8. Maynard: A Lightweight Wayland Desktop
  9. Chromium Browser Going Through Growing Pains In Ubuntu 14.04
  10. KDE 4.13 Is Being Released Today With New Features
  11. Trying Out Radeon R9 290 Graphics On Open-Source
  12. Intel Broadwell GT3 Graphics Have Dual BSD Rings
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. After Jack Keane, RuseSoft will briing Ankh 3 to Linux through Desura
  2. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  3. Suspected PHP Proxy Issue
  4. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  5. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  6. Change installation destination from home directory
  7. Bye bye BSD, Hello Linux: A Sys Admin's Story
  8. New tool for undervolt/overclock AMD K8L and K10 processors