1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

KDE No Longer Competitive? Developer Calls It Quits

KDE

Published on 26 June 2012 10:30 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in KDE
152 Comments

Peter Penz, the main developer of the Dolphin file manager for the KDE desktop and a K Desktop user since KDE v1.2, is calling it quits after contributing to KDE for more than the past half-decade. His reason for leaving the development of the popular open-source desktop environment is interesting.

With the release of KDE 4.9 in August there will be the Dolphin 2.1 file manager and that will be the last release to be handled by Peter Penz, someone that's been working on Dolphin since before the KDE 4.0 release. After the 4.9 release is out the door he will be handing control over to Frank Reininghaus. When this handover is complete, he doesn't even expect to provide bug-fixes or even continue using KDE as his main desktop environment.

Why is Penz doing this? Below is a brief excerpt from a blog post he penned this morning.
Sadly for me this still would not be enough to keep on maintaining Dolphin, as there is another reason to quit contributing: I'm using KDE since version 1.2 and I never cared what market share KDE or Linux on the desktop has. However to me it was important that the desktop-environment I'm using and spending time for can compete with the desktops-environments from Microsoft and Apple. As user I always had the impression that I can do my regular tasks like reading e-mails, browsing, managing my photo- and music-collection, rarely writing a document, maintaining my contacts, adding calendar-entries... in a more efficient and comfortable way than on the other desktop-environments.

But at least for my regular tasks as user this has changed during the last couple of years. It is tricky to give examples without pointing fingers to parts of KDE where I think we are not competitive anymore, so I won't do this.
He goes on to explain how the user interfaces are becoming simpler while the functionality of the applications are increasing without an effective UI, increasing complexity of non-UI elements of applications, etc. "Working on the non-user-interface parts of applications can be challenging and this is not something that most freetime-contributors are striving for. But if there are not enough contributors for the complex stuff behind the scenes and if no company is willing to invest fulltime-developers to work on this... - well then we are losing ground. And even if Gnome seems to get more support from companies, I don't see a big difference to KDE here. Probably my explanation/guess/theory is nonsense and utterly wrong. But this does not change my point of view that at least for my tasks I can work in a more efficient and comfortable way on other desktop environments in the meantime. And this aspect makes it hard to keep up the motivation for investigating a lot of spare-time into KDE."

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 & E5-2687W v3 Compared To The Core i7 5960X On Linux
  2. Intel 120GB 530 Series SSD Linux Performance
  3. Btrfs/EXT4/XFS/F2FS RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Linux Benchmarks On Four SSDs
  4. AMD's Windows Catalyst Driver Remains Largely Faster Than Linux Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Apple OS X 10.10 vs. Ubuntu 14.10 Performance
  2. Mesa 10.5-devel Brings Some Intel Haswell HD Graphics Changes Over Mesa 10.3
  3. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers With Linux 3.18 + Mesa 10.4-devel
  4. Is The Open-Source NVIDIA Driver Fast Enough For Steam On Linux Gaming?
Latest Linux News
  1. Expensive "Free/Libre Software Laptop" Uses A NVIDIA GPU
  2. QEMU 2.2-rc3 Released, Final Release Pushed Back By Couple Days
  3. 64-bit ARM FreeBSD Support Is Taking Shape
  4. GCW Zero Starts Seeing New Game Releases
  5. Intel's Cherry Trail Delayed To Next Year
  6. Bq Introduces More Android Devices, But Still No Ubuntu Phones
  7. Qt 5.4 Release Candidate Expected Later This Week
  8. ArrayFire Accelerated Compute Library Open-Sourced
  9. Amazon's Fire TV Stick: A Nice, Affordable Media Center Option
  10. Google Puts Chrome NPAPI Support On Final Countdown
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Hurrican SDL Port
  2. Roadmap to Catalyst 14.10 ?
  3. how to configure module phoromatic ?
  4. PulseAudio 6.0 Is Coming & Other Linux Audio Plans For The Future
  5. Debian Developer Resigns From The Systemd Maintainership Team
  6. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  7. Cant get working Kaveri APU - A10-7850k
  8. Script for Fan Speed Control