Fedora 17: Beefier Than Ubuntu 12.04 LTS?
Written by Michael Larabel in Fedora on 8 June 2012 at 06:42 PM EDT. 35 Comments
Proper and extensive benchmarks of Fedora 17 against Ubuntu 12.04 LTS are forthcoming, but here's a preview of some results.

Benchmarks of Fedora 17 versus Ubuntu 12.04 LTS are coming soon now that the "Beefy Miracle" has been officially released. (Development builds of Fedora aren't benchmarked since Red Hat's been sticking a bunch of debug stuff into their pre-final kernel and packages that can impact the performance compared to Ubuntu's always-standard state.) The results in full from multiple systems will be published by month's end, but here is just a preview when comparing the x86_64 versions of Fedora 17 and Ubuntu 12.04 LTS on a single system.

System details and the benchmark results in full are available via OpenBenchmarking.org. You can also compare your system's performance to these results with the Phoronix Test Suite by running phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1206074-SU-1206062SU09. Embedded below are just some of the most interesting results from this system with an Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 "Penryn" processor, NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M graphics, 4GB of RAM, and a 100GB HDD. Both Fedora 17 and Ubuntu 12.04 were tested in their default states.

From the HDD-backed notebook, Fedora 17 tended to have better file-system performance than Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. Fedora 17 is using the Linux 3.3 kernel while Ubuntu 12.04 is on Linux 3.2. Both are using the EXT4 file-system at present, but with Fedora 18 is where the hat wearing crew might switch to Btrfs.

Fedora 17 also won a number of the computational benchmarks over Ubuntu 12.04 LTS on the dual-core Intel 64-bit processor, but Fedora 17 was quick to adopt GCC 4.7 where as Ubuntu 12.04 LTS took the conservative approach of living with GCC 4.6. GCC 4.7 benchmarks have indicated a number of performance improvements out of this major compiler update.

More definitive data is forthcoming, but until then head on over to the OpenBenchmarking.org result file if you're interested in more information.

From a performance perspective at least, on first bite Fedora 17 does appear to be tastier due to its more bleeding edge menu.
About The Author
Author picture

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.

Related Fedora News
Popular News
Trending Reviews & Featured Articles