LLVMpipe Still Doesn't Work For Linux Gaming

Posted by Michael Larabel on May 28, 2012

For those curious what OpenGL gaming frame-rates are like if trying to run LLVMpipe on the latest Intel Ivy Bridge processors, here are some numbers.

LLVMpipe is the Gallium3D-based software-accelerated driver fall-back that does OpenGL on the CPU. LLVMpipe leverages the LLVM compiler infrastructure to take advantage of multiple CPU cores, the latest CPU instruction sets, and other capabilities. However, running OpenGL on the CPU is still no match to a dedicated GPU; CPUs and GPUs are very different beasts and to each his own. Using LLVMpipe is good enough for a composited desktop environment (GNOME Shell, Unity, etc), but for games it's far from being sufficient. On the desktop side, LLVMpipe works surprisingly well for thin clients / multi-seats.

While OpenGL games over LLVMpipe is slow as molasses, it's also interesting to see how well LLVMpipe is doing for OpenGL gaming on the processor to measure CPU improvements, Mesa/Gallium3D architectural improvements / optimizations, and how well LLVM is doing.

I've done LLVMpipe on AMD Bulldozer and Intel Sandy Bridge, but here are some benchmarks when using LLVMpipe on Intel Ivy Bridge.

For this quick round of benchmarking is an Intel Core i7 3770K Ivy Bridge processor running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS x86_64 and then dropping in the Linux 3.4 kernel, LLVM 3.0, and Mesa 8.1-devel with LLVMpipe from Git. Being compared is the LLVMpipe performance to the Intel Mesa IVB graphics driver using the same software packages.

To no real surprise, LLVMpipe still won't work well for OpenGL gaming even with the latest high-end Intel processor. At least though it's good enough for handling modern desktops like GNOME Shell and Unity.

You can compare your system's performance to these LLVMpipe and Intel IVB numbers by simply running phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1205289-SU-LLVMPIPEI36. Additional system information and other details for this quick round of Intel Linux Ivy Bridge benchmarks can be found from the OpenBenchmarking.org result file.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  2. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  3. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  4. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
Latest Linux News
  1. Mageia 3 Released, Still Using Legacy GRUB
  2. NetBSD 6.1 Brings In More Features
  3. Using Six Monitors With AMD's Open-Source Linux Driver
  4. Benchmarking The Intel P-State, CPUfreq Changes
  5. FreeBSD Still Working On Next-Gen Package Manager
  6. DNF Still Advancing As Experimental Yum For Fedora
  7. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  8. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed With
  9. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
  10. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
  11. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks For Intel Ivy Bridge
Latest Forum Talk
  1. A New Set Of OpenGL Benchmarks Come To...
  2. Mageia 3 Released, Still Using Legacy GRUB
  3. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  4. Using Six Monitors With AMD's Open-Source Linux...
  5. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  6. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite