1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Ten Suggestions For The GNOME Camp

GNOME

Published on 10 September 2012 12:16 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in GNOME
70 Comments

Stemming from last year's GNOME User Survey that was hosted on Phoronix since the GNOME Foundation wasn't interested, the results continue to be analyzed.

While it's been nearly one year since this survey that pulled in nearly 10,000 responses, the comments continue to be analyzed. Felipe Contreras, the original GNOME enthusiast that conceived the GNOME user survey idea and approached the GNOME Foundation before bringing it to Phoronix after the official GNOME developers weren't interested, is still going through the data.

He already provided his analysis of the 2011 GNOME user survey results last week finally. Most viewed the results as being critical of GNOME, but he's now come up with a list of Top 10 suggestions from the 2011 GNOME user survey. "I’ve taken the time to read one by one the suggestions from the 2011 GNOME user survey, I’ve only managed to read 20% of them so far, but I don’t think they will shift that much."

The top ten suggestions for GNOME come down to:

1. Better customization support is needed.
2. Bring back the GNOME 2 love, mainly in the form of offering a secondary GNOME3 interface that brings back the GNOME2-style panel and task-bar.
3. Improve the performance and memory foot-print with GNOME becoming "too bloated", using too much of the CPU and system memory.
4. The Nautilus file manager is too slow and lacks key functionality, some want to see an alternative adopted.
5. Improve the GNOME notifications.
6. Add the shutdown/restart/suspend options back.
7. Improve the GNOME theming support.
8. Better multi-monitor support is needed for the GNOME Shell.
9. Evolution needs improvements, if it's not killed off completely.
10. Listen to users rather than ignoring users.

Felipe Contreras additionally wrote:
As #10 shows, the problem is that GNOME developers don’t listen to the users, or at least that’s the perception from a lot of users, and since the community rejected the idea of running and/or blessing this survey, it would be safe to assume that they would ignore the results. The story of this survey is rather interesting, and explains a lot, but you can read about it through Bruce Byfield’s mouth instead of mine in his article ‘The Survey That GNOME Would Rather Ignore‘.

Even before the survey was run, GNOME developers said the results would be worthless, however, the only valid criticism was the possibility of non-response bias, which fortunately didn’t happen, and I explained why in my analysis of the survey results. I still haven’t received any comments from GNOME developers after I publicized the analysis of the results, so if there’s any valid criticism remaining, I still haven’t heard of it.

I wish they would look at these results critically, not outright reject them, and if there’s any problem with the survey, tackle the problems for the 2012 survey, and even more: run the survey themselves. Wouldn’t that be great?
He is also working on a 2012 GNOME User Survey. Assuming the GNOME Foundation and developers don't change their mind and want to officially endorse this survey and host it themselves, Phoronix will again be happy to host this survey to show what real Linux desktop users really think of GNOME.

Other suggestions from last year's survey include removing dependencies like PulseAudio, improve GNOME's reliability and stability, improved tiling support, fixing ATI Catalyst driver issues, integration of Zeitgeist, rendering KDE applications seamlessly, and Compiz compatibility.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Acer B286HK: A 28-inch UHD LED 4K Monitor For As Low As $350
  2. Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 & E5-2687W v3 Compared To The Core i7 5960X On Linux
  3. Intel 120GB 530 Series SSD Linux Performance
  4. Btrfs/EXT4/XFS/F2FS RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Linux Benchmarks On Four SSDs
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Mesa Git Yields Performance Improvements For Newer AMD GPUs
  2. Apple OS X 10.10 vs. Ubuntu 14.10 Performance
  3. Mesa 10.5-devel Brings Some Intel Haswell HD Graphics Changes Over Mesa 10.3
  4. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers With Linux 3.18 + Mesa 10.4-devel
Latest Linux News
  1. Devuan: Debian Without Systemd
  2. Wine 1.7.32 Updates Its Mono Engine
  3. Mesa 10.4 Release Candidate 3 Is Here For Weekend Testing
  4. GenodeOS 14.11 Now Supports Intel's Wireless Hardware
  5. Jolla Tablet Could Have Upgrades For MicroSDHC, Split Screen, 3.5G
  6. Intel Has Last Round Of DRM Changes For Linux 3.19, Starts Dropping DRI1/UMS
  7. Fedora 21 Release Candidate 1 Awaits Your Testing
  8. GCC 5 Adds Support For ARM's Cortex-A17
  9. KWayland Server Component Coming For KDE Plasma 5.2
  10. NVIDIA Posts Tegra Gallium3D Patch For K1+ Support
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Aliens vs predator for Linux
  2. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  3. Hurrican SDL Port
  4. Roadmap to Catalyst 14.10 ?
  5. how to configure module phoromatic ?
  6. PulseAudio 6.0 Is Coming & Other Linux Audio Plans For The Future
  7. Debian Developer Resigns From The Systemd Maintainership Team
  8. Cant get working Kaveri APU - A10-7850k