1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Ten Suggestions For The GNOME Camp

GNOME

Published on 10 September 2012 12:16 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in GNOME
70 Comments

Stemming from last year's GNOME User Survey that was hosted on Phoronix since the GNOME Foundation wasn't interested, the results continue to be analyzed.

While it's been nearly one year since this survey that pulled in nearly 10,000 responses, the comments continue to be analyzed. Felipe Contreras, the original GNOME enthusiast that conceived the GNOME user survey idea and approached the GNOME Foundation before bringing it to Phoronix after the official GNOME developers weren't interested, is still going through the data.

He already provided his analysis of the 2011 GNOME user survey results last week finally. Most viewed the results as being critical of GNOME, but he's now come up with a list of Top 10 suggestions from the 2011 GNOME user survey. "I’ve taken the time to read one by one the suggestions from the 2011 GNOME user survey, I’ve only managed to read 20% of them so far, but I don’t think they will shift that much."

The top ten suggestions for GNOME come down to:

1. Better customization support is needed.
2. Bring back the GNOME 2 love, mainly in the form of offering a secondary GNOME3 interface that brings back the GNOME2-style panel and task-bar.
3. Improve the performance and memory foot-print with GNOME becoming "too bloated", using too much of the CPU and system memory.
4. The Nautilus file manager is too slow and lacks key functionality, some want to see an alternative adopted.
5. Improve the GNOME notifications.
6. Add the shutdown/restart/suspend options back.
7. Improve the GNOME theming support.
8. Better multi-monitor support is needed for the GNOME Shell.
9. Evolution needs improvements, if it's not killed off completely.
10. Listen to users rather than ignoring users.

Felipe Contreras additionally wrote:
As #10 shows, the problem is that GNOME developers don’t listen to the users, or at least that’s the perception from a lot of users, and since the community rejected the idea of running and/or blessing this survey, it would be safe to assume that they would ignore the results. The story of this survey is rather interesting, and explains a lot, but you can read about it through Bruce Byfield’s mouth instead of mine in his article ‘The Survey That GNOME Would Rather Ignore‘.

Even before the survey was run, GNOME developers said the results would be worthless, however, the only valid criticism was the possibility of non-response bias, which fortunately didn’t happen, and I explained why in my analysis of the survey results. I still haven’t received any comments from GNOME developers after I publicized the analysis of the results, so if there’s any valid criticism remaining, I still haven’t heard of it.

I wish they would look at these results critically, not outright reject them, and if there’s any problem with the survey, tackle the problems for the 2012 survey, and even more: run the survey themselves. Wouldn’t that be great?
He is also working on a 2012 GNOME User Survey. Assuming the GNOME Foundation and developers don't change their mind and want to officially endorse this survey and host it themselves, Phoronix will again be happy to host this survey to show what real Linux desktop users really think of GNOME.

Other suggestions from last year's survey include removing dependencies like PulseAudio, improve GNOME's reliability and stability, improved tiling support, fixing ATI Catalyst driver issues, integration of Zeitgeist, rendering KDE applications seamlessly, and Compiz compatibility.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Even With Re-Clocking, Nouveau Remains Behind NVIDIA's Proprietary Linux Driver
  2. The Power Consumption & Efficiency Of Open-Source GPU Drivers
  3. AMD R600g/RadeonSI Performance On Linux 3.16 With Mesa 10.3-devel
  4. Intel Pentium G3258 On Linux
Latest Linux Articles
  1. AMD Catalyst 14.6 Does Slightly Better With APITest OpenGL Tests
  2. Updated Source Engine Benchmarks On The Latest AMD/NVIDIA Linux Drivers
  3. Nouveau vs. Radeon vs. Intel Tests On Linux 3.16, Mesa 10.3-devel
  4. KVM Benchmarks On Ubuntu 14.10
Latest Linux News
  1. AMD Launches The A10-7800, The 65 Watt Kaveri
  2. Builder: A New Development IDE Being Built For GNOME
  3. GDB 7.8 Betters Python Scripting, Adds Guile Support
  4. GNOME's GTK+ Is Still Striving For A Scene Graph, Canvas API
  5. Unreal Tournament Looks Great For Team Deathmatch
  6. LibreOffice 4.3 Released With Many Exciting Changes
  7. GNOME/GTK On Wayland Gains Focus At GUADEC
  8. GNOME Stakeholders Take Issue With Groupon Over their Gnome
  9. GStreamer VA-API Plug-In Update Adds New Features
  10. Qt 5.4 Going Into Feature Freeze Next Week With Exciting Changes
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. AMD Publishes Open-Source Linux HSA Kernel Driver
  2. Linus Torvalds On GCC 4.9: Pure & Utter Crap
  3. Debian + radeonsi
  4. Grand Theft Auto Running On Direct3D Natively On Linux Shows Gallium3D Potential
  5. Open-source drivers on ATI R7 260X
  6. AMD Athlon 5350 APU On Linux
  7. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  8. List of Linux friendly Kickstarter projects