1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Fedora Development Cycle

Fedora

Published on 06 March 2006 01:00 AM EST
Written by Michael Larabel in Fedora
Comment On This Article

David Nielsen and Peter Gordon have proposed development cycle changes for Fedora. At this present time there is a 9-month cycle between major releases, and this new strategy would involved a two-tiered plan. One of the releases would target aggressive users demanding the very latest packages in their distribution (those who often tap into Rawhide for the Fedora Project), and then the alternative users that provide stability and a bug-free environment rather than necessarily being the latest-and-greatest. David's proposed plan would be to release a "technology preview" every nine months, which would involve six months of pure coding while the later three months would be the time to addresses all serious issues. This technology preview would serve as an interim release for those users that would die without the latest packages. This tech preview for Fedora wouldn't be bug free but they would hope to address all critical problems. Coming another four months after this Fedora preview would be the full release with all of the bugs properly addressed. No word yet if Red Hat (Fedora's corporate sponsor) supports this or if any other Fedora leaders would embrace this new development strategy.

My personal thought on this matter from an end-user standpoint is that the status quo is certainly satisfactory with their cycle they have done since the Tettnang days. Those users seeking the bleeding-edge status, they can easily use one of the testing builds. It is also important to look at the MASSIVE improvements from Fedora Core 4 to Fedora Core 5. For those users wishing the latest-and-greatest they can simply tap into the Rawhide repository and get all sorts of nightly development builds. Stretching their major development cycle beyond a year (Nelisen's present statement would be 13 months) could get fierce opposition from some users who prefer the present cycle. As stated before, this is simply talk right now and there is no official word if they intend to enact these ideals.


About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Rosewill RS-MI-01: An Ultra Low-Cost Mini-ITX Chassis
  2. D-Link DCS-2330L HD Wireless Network Camera
  3. Gigabyte AM1M-S2H
  4. AMD's New Athlon/Semprons Give Old Phenom CPUs A Big Run For The Money
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0 RC Benchmarks
  2. AMD Catalyst 14.4 Brings Few Linux Performance Improvements
  3. The Performance Of Fedora 20 Updated
  4. Clang Fights GCC On AMD's Athlon AM1 APU With Jaguar Cores
Latest Linux News
  1. More Steam Linux Tests/Benchmarks Might Be Coming
  2. NVIDIA's Amazing Single-Board ARM Computer Might Be Delayed
  3. Fedora 21 To Get A Playground, New Features
  4. PC-BSD Is Developing Its Own Desktop Environment
  5. Valve Is Bringing VOGL To Windows & Working On Regression Tests
  6. Canonical Is Taking Over Linux 3.13 Kernel Maintenance
  7. Google Web Designer Is Now Natively Available On Linux
  8. Ubuntu 14.10 Is Codenamed The Utopic Unicorn
  9. Audacious 3.5 Lightweight Audio Player Released
  10. Steam Updated For Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, SteamOS
  11. DNF 0.5 Yum Replacement Now Supports Groups
  12. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0 Is Looking Fantastic
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. HTPC-upgrade advice: AMD Richland A8-7600 or Kaveri A10-6700T ???
  2. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  3. What Else Would You Like To See On Phoronix This Spring?
  4. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  5. The Most Amazing OpenGL Tech Demo In 64kb
  6. Announcing radeontop, a tool for viewing the GPU usage
  7. New card. Open source drivers only.
  8. Script for Fan Speed Control