1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Mesa Support For ETC1 Texture Compression

Mesa

Published on 16 July 2012 08:33 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Mesa
6 Comments

With commits this afternoon by Intel, there's now support for handling ETC1 texture compression within Mesa.

The commits from Chad Versace of Intel provide a function for decoding ETC1 textures (this commit) and then another commit enables the GL_OES_compressed_ETC1_RGB8_texture extension for all hardware using the Intel DRI driver. Intel hardware doesn't currently handle ETC1 so the data is converted instead to RGBX data.

ETC1 is the original version of Ericsson Texture Compression, which was conceived about a half-decade ago and based upon the original PACKMAN texture compression design for mobile phones. ETC1 provides six times compression of 24-bit RGB data, but doesn't support alpha components while a newer ETC2 provides higher-quality RGB compression along with alpha support. However, this newer ETC2 implementation isn't yet supported by software or hardware and is only months old.

Ericsson Texture Compression is part of the OpenGL ES specification and is also part of the WebGL specification too. It's nice that there's support for a new texture compression scheme within Mesa, but too bad there's no progress to report at this time of S3TC texture compression support within mainline Mesa. S3TC is still only available as a third-party source library over patent/legal concerns, although this means of texture compression is widely used and relied upon within the professional/gaming desktop world.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  2. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
  3. AMD A10-7800 & A6-7400K APUs Run Great On Linux
  4. Radeon Gallium3D Is Running Increasingly Well Against AMD's Catalyst Driver
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Radeon Graphics Yield Mixed Results With Linux 3.17 Kernel
  2. AMD's RadeonSI Driver Sped Up A Lot This Summer
  3. Intel's Latest Linux Graphics Code Competes Against OS X 10.9
  4. Intel Sandy Bridge Gets A Surprise Boost From Linux 3.17
Latest Linux News
  1. Preview Of AMD Radeon R9 290 Hawaii Open-Source Performance
  2. Intel Bay Trail Performance With Linux 3.16/3.17 & Mesa 10.3
  3. EFL Sees A Ton Of Work Following Recent v1.11 Release
  4. ARM Talks Up Wayland For Mali
  5. GNOME/GTK+ Human Interface Guidelines Updated
  6. Robocraft Is Rolling Over To Linux
  7. The Widely-Criticized New Commercial Linux Distro Is Now On Kickstarter
  8. Wayland & Weston 1.6 Alpha Released
  9. A New First-Person Mystery Game Might Be Coming To Linux
  10. Patch By Patch, LLVM Clang Gets Better At Building The Linux Kernel
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Systemd 216 Piles On More Features, Aims For New User-Space VT
  2. Btrfs Gets Talked Up, Googler Encourages You To Try Btrfs
  3. OSS radeon driver for A10-7850K (Kaveri)
  4. Could be avoid to use flash for show the benchmark on the articles?
  5. American Citizens running AMOK for food stamps
  6. What Linux Distribution Should Be Benchmarked The Most?
  7. Company I work for is looking to contribute to Open Source projects... but wrongly?
  8. Microsoft vs. Campaign