1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Linux, Open-Source Affected In AMD Cutbacks?

AMD

Published on 05 November 2011 08:32 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in AMD
38 Comments

By now many of you have likely heard that AMD is laying off around 10% of its workforce by next year in a restructuring attempt to lower its operating costs, but will their open-source and Linux efforts be hampered by this move?

Initial indications are that AMD's Linux and open-source efforts will not be severely hit as AMD lets go of around 1400 employees worldwide.

AMD's John Bridgman has commented in our forums that they're still there. In particular, him and Alex Deucher along with their new open-source employees: Michel Dänzer, Tom Stellard, and Christian König. Even laying off one of these five open-source Linux graphics developers would be a significant (20%) hit.

At least for now it seems the open-source Radeon Linux developers are safe. Beyond providing hardware enablement of new Radeon hardware in the open-source Linux stack via code and documentation, there's added benefit to keep them around since AMD has ported the Linux driver to Windows (WEC7).

On the AMD Catalyst driver side as it pertains to the teams working specifically on the Linux bits, I haven't heard or seen (LinkedIn, emails suddenly bouncing, etc) of any pertinent people being let go there. Fortunately much of the code-base is also shared in the Catalyst driver between Windows and Linux.

The area taking the biggest hit is not in the AMD Graphics division but rather on the CPU ("AMD Legacy") side. It seems most of the slashes are occurring there since that's where AMD has been struggling as of late while their recent generations of graphics processors have been flourishing in popularity. Many have viewed AMD's recent launch of the first-generation CPUs Bulldozer architecture as being a flop and there are no immediate corrections insight.

Among the hardest hit at AMD with this downsizing is the press/marketing departments, where reportedly a majority of them were dismissed. It's hard to see any hard-working and dedicated individuals to be let go, but at least they didn't have much involvement with Linux. They really weren't familiar with the Linux topics, really not concerned about the Linux desktop enthusiasts, etc.

AMD's Linux engineers and other non-marketing folks tend to do a better job. Heck, AMD's John Bridgman alone has nearly 6,000 posts in the Phoronix Forums providing technical support, guidance, various bits of helpful information, and even cooking recipes. That's community/customer engagement!

In terms of any Linux / open-source engineers on the AMD CPU side losing their jobs, I have yet to hear of anything significant. I'm not nearly as well tapped with sources on the CPU side as I am with AMD Graphics, but so far there are no indications of any losses for developers that were working on new hardware support in the Linux kernel (e.g. Bulldozer patches), compiler optimiozations, or other matters. There might be a minor hit on their open-source / Linux work in Dresden, but so far that's unconfirmed.

If I hear anything else, expect a Phoronix update. There's already a second thread in the Phoronix Forums with users extensively discussing the lay-offs and AMD's future.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. NVIDIA's $1000+ GeForce GTX TITAN X Delivers Maximum Linux Performance
  2. OS X 10.10 vs. Ubuntu 15.04 vs. Fedora 21 Tests: Linux Sweeps The Board
  3. The New Place Where Linux Code Is Constantly Being Benchmarked
  4. 18-GPU NVIDIA/AMD Linux Comparison Of BioShock: Infinite
  5. Phoronix Test Suite 5.6 Adds New Phoromatic Enterprise Benchmarking Features
  6. OpenGL Threaded Optimizations Responsible For NVIDIA's Faster Performance?
Latest Linux News
  1. Intel Pushes A Bunch Of Broadwell Code Into Coreboot
  2. Open-Source Driver Fans Will Love NVIDIA's New OpenGL Demo
  3. GHC 7.10.1 Brings New Compiler Features
  4. Git 2.4.0-rc0 Does A Ton Of Polishing
  5. The Most Common, Annoying Issue When Benchmarking Ubuntu On Many Systems
  6. Mesa Is At Nearly 1,500 Commits This Year
  7. Gestures & Other GTK3 Features For LibreOffice
  8. It's Now Easier To Try PHP 7 On Fedora & RHEL
  9. BQ Is Cleaning Up Their Aquaris E4.5 Ubuntu Kernel
  10. Allwinner Continues Jerking Around The Open-Source Community
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Introducing The Library Operating System For Linux
  2. AMD Is Hiring Two More Open-Source Linux GPU Driver Developers
  3. New SecureBoot Concerns Arise With Windows 10
  4. GNOME Shell & Mutter 3.16.0 Released
  5. GNU Nano 2.4.0 Brings Complete Undo System, Linter Support & More
  6. Systemd Change Allows For Stateless Systems With Tmpfs
  7. GCC 5 Compiler Is Getting Close To Being Released
  8. Red Hat Is Rolling Out A VirtIO DRM/KMS GPU Driver
%%CLICK_URL_UNESC%%