Ubuntu Friendly Wasn't So Friendly After All

Posted by Michael Larabel on May 09, 2012

Ubuntu Friendly -- the Canonical-spawned initiative for the community to try to provide information on computer hardware that's "friendly" to run Ubuntu Linux -- is not being actively maintained.

Just months after it launched, Canonical QA engineers are more or less letting Ubuntu Friendly stand still and wanting to hand the work off to others. Ubuntu Friendly basically came down to a hardware database that listed computer systems and their components known to be compatible with Ubuntu. Ubuntu Friendly never really took off as a community success and evidently have too much on their table to maintain, so a session on Tuesday was held where they were kicking around some ideas or how to make it a success. They want to "hand the project to better hands."

One of the figures heard is that they were only getting around 6,000 unique visitors per month, which is extremely low. For comparison, OpenBenchmarking.org, which is the Phoronix Test Suite version of a centralized and collaborative database of test information and Linux hardware compatibility information (and not limited to just Ubuntu) easily does much more than six thousand uniques in any given day.

Ubuntu Friendly is just driven by Canonical's Checkbox software to ask the user for various questions if a given component is working or not and how they would rate its support. This isn't so friendly itself with being largely user-driven and not fully automated nor actively promoted by Canonical/Ubuntu -- at the same time as this they try to push the Ubuntu Certification to hardware vendors and their component catalog, etc.

The user front-end also isn't friendly with limited search capabilities, not parsing the components in a user-friendly manner, etc. There's also just not a lot of results -- 109 three-star friendly systems for Ubuntu 12.04 at the time of publishing this article. The information exposed also isn't overly useful or in-depth.

Over in the Fedora camp, they're also in the process of decommissioning Smolt, their their five-year old equivalent. Fedora Smolt is expected to be replaced by a Fedora Census initiative.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  2. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  3. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  4. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
Latest Linux News
  1. Mageia 3 Released, Still Using Legacy GRUB
  2. NetBSD 6.1 Brings In More Features
  3. Using Six Monitors With AMD's Open-Source Linux Driver
  4. Benchmarking The Intel P-State, CPUfreq Changes
  5. FreeBSD Still Working On Next-Gen Package Manager
  6. DNF Still Advancing As Experimental Yum For Fedora
  7. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  8. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed With
  9. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
  10. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
  11. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks For Intel Ivy Bridge
Latest Forum Talk
  1. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  2. DRM Moves Ahead With HTML5 Specification
  3. Mageia 3 Released, Still Using Legacy GRUB
  4. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  5. Logitech supports linux!
  6. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite