1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

GCC 4.6/4.7 vs. LLVM-Clang 3.0/3.1 Compilers

Compiler

Published on 07 May 2012 09:52 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Compiler
21 Comments

With LLVM/Clang 3.1 due out next week, here's a look at the compiler performance of the GCC 4.6 and 4.7 compilers compared to LLVM-Clang 3.0 and a recent LLVM-Clang 3.1 SVN snapshot.

This testing was done from an Intel Sandy Bridge platform in late April while new Intel Ivy Bridge compiler benchmarks and other results are due out soon. There's also some AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer compiler benchmarks and some other earlier Clang 3.1 results.

Aside from GCC 4.6.3, GCC 4.7.0, LLVM-Clang 3.0, and LLVM-Clang 3.1 SVN, AMD's Open64 5.0 x86_64 compiler was tossed into the mix. However, for the Intel Sandy Bridge platform and the set of open-source test profiles used, AMD's Open64 flavor only ended up working for a single test profile.

As far as the features of LLVM/Clang 3.1, many of the key items are mentioned in this article. The key highlights of GCC 4.7.0 are listed here. The results begin in this article and are then continued on OpenBenchmarking.org.

See many more results on OpenBenchmarking.org. You can also run phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1204215-SU-LLVMCLANG23 to facilitate an automated side-by-side compiler comparison on your system's software/hardware via the Phoronix Test Suite.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. NVIDIA's $1000+ GeForce GTX TITAN X Delivers Maximum Linux Performance
  2. OS X 10.10 vs. Ubuntu 15.04 vs. Fedora 21 Tests: Linux Sweeps The Board
  3. The New Place Where Linux Code Is Constantly Being Benchmarked
  4. 18-GPU NVIDIA/AMD Linux Comparison Of BioShock: Infinite
  5. Phoronix Test Suite 5.6 Adds New Phoromatic Enterprise Benchmarking Features
  6. OpenGL Threaded Optimizations Responsible For NVIDIA's Faster Performance?
Latest Linux News
  1. Mesa's Android Support Is Currently In Bad Shape
  2. Wayland's Weston Terminal Can Now Be Minimized
  3. Phoronix - Working Towards Faster Page Loads
  4. Improved OpenCL Support For Blender's Cycles Renderer
  5. Mesa 10.5.2 Packs In A Handful Of Fixes
  6. More Fedora/Ubuntu Linux vs. OS X OpenGL Benchmarks
  7. Intel Adds Mesa IR To NIR Translator & Makes Other NIR Improvements
  8. HAMMER2 Gets A Man Page
  9. Kodi 14.2 Released To End Out The "XBMC" 14.x Series
  10. Debian 8.0 Jessie RC2 Installer Released
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Introducing The Library Operating System For Linux
  2. Allwinner Continues Jerking Around The Open-Source Community
  3. AMD Is Hiring Two More Open-Source Linux GPU Driver Developers
  4. Systemd Change Allows For Stateless Systems With Tmpfs
  5. GNOME Shell & Mutter 3.16.0 Released
  6. GNU Nano 2.4.0 Brings Complete Undo System, Linter Support & More
  7. GNOME 3.16 Released: It's Their Best Release Yet
  8. Red Hat Is Rolling Out A VirtIO DRM/KMS GPU Driver
%%CLICK_URL_UNESC%%