1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Intel Pushes Out Glamor 0.4 Release

Intel

Published on 28 April 2012 12:31 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Intel
2 Comments

Zhigang Gong on the behalf of the Intel China team released Glamor 0.4 as the latest work on the unique Glamor acceleration architecture for the Intel X.Org driver.

Zhigang Gong released Glamor 0.4 on Saturday morning via this mailing list message. It's a nice in-depth release announcement covering the changes, build process, and future plans.

Glamor 0.4 now properly works with DRI2 and GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap support, fully supports GLX including AIGLX, optimizations in the fall-back paths, fully support all color formats for the OpenGL ES 2.0 (GLES2) port, many bug-fixes, and a FBO/texture cache pool mechanism to reduce the overhead of texture/FBO creation and destruction. This cache pool mechanism is said to improve the performance by 15~20% or for a PowerVR 545 platform about a 10x performance improvement.

Enabling Intel Glamor acceleration requires rebuilding Mesa with special parameters, building xf86-video-intel DDX with the --enable-glamor option, and building the actual Glamor source-code. A special xorg.conf file for Glamor is also needed.

The Glamor source itself can be looked at via FreeDesktop.org CGit.

For Glamor 0.5, Intel's plans include full gradient optimizations including linear and radial gradients, large pixmap support, full trapezoid optimization, and fine tuning the FBO caching mechanism.

Those not familiar with the Intel Glamor acceleration architecture can learn more via this Wiki page. Coming up soon will be Intel Ivy Bridge Linux benchmarks running Git and comparing the stock xf86-video-intel DDX UXA acceleration, SNA acceleration, and Glamor acceleration.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Btrfs On 4 x Intel SSDs In RAID 0/1/5/6/10
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290 On Ubuntu 14.10: RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst
  3. MSI X99S SLI PLUS On Linux
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Windows 8.1 vs. Ubuntu 14.10 With Intel HD Graphics
  2. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Radeon Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Driver Comparison
  3. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers On Ubuntu 14.10
  4. Ubuntu 14.10 Offers AMD Radeon Driver Performance Improvements
Latest Linux News
  1. GTK+ 3.16's New GtkGLArea Widget Gets Improved
  2. X.Org Server 1.17 ABI Bumped
  3. Fedora 21 Beta To Be Released Next Week
  4. Go 1.4 Beta Release Brings Big Runtime Changes
  5. SIMD For JavaScript Continues Coming Along
  6. GNOME 3.15.1 Released
  7. Red Hat Software Collections 1.2 Adds GCC 4.9, Nginx 1.6
  8. GLAMOR Acceleration Continues To Be Cleaned Up
  9. Russia's Yandex Web Browser Finally Released For Linux
  10. Linux Kernel Finally Being Optimized For SSHDs
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. How to get rid of Linux
  2. Is foolish currently develop in machine code, hexadecimal and assembly?
  3. Reducing The CPU Usage In Mesa To Improve Performance
  4. Help diagnosing problems with a Readon HD 4670 on Mesa 10.3.2-1
  5. Advertisements On Phoronix
  6. nv and xorg.conf under Debian PPC
  7. Looking for a Open-Source AMD experienced Linux mentor
  8. Bad perfomance in gaming