There's some resurrected hope for the kernel symbols of the DMA-BUF buffer sharing mechanism to be not restricted to only GPL drivers, which started off as a request by NVIDIA. This could lead to better NVIDIA Optimus support under Linux, among other benefits.
is the buffer sharing mechanism for the Linux kernel that was introduced in the 3.3 cycle
for zero-copy sharing of buffers between kernel drivers. This work originally came out of the Linaro project since there's a need for such a mechanism by various ARM SoC driver developers. However, there's also benefits to this work when it comes to GPU hot-plugging
, OpenCL / GPGPU computing
, and multi-GPU configurations like NVIDIA Optimus.
To learn more about DMA-BUF for Linux, watch this DMA-BUF video
from FOSDEM 2012
when Daniel Vetter of Intel was speaking about this infrastructure.
Back in January there was a request by NVIDIA
that the DMA-BUF kernel symbols be not exported GPL-only, which would prevent them from taking advantage of this buffer sharing mechanism in their proprietary driver. This would inhibit them from being able to easily/cleanly share buffers between their binary driver and say the Intel open-source driver in Optimus cases where there's both Intel and NVIDIA graphics. Or for buffer-sharing between an open-source NVIDIA Tegra kernel driver and the binary driver with a GeForce GPU, a case that one of the requesting NVIDIA engineer mentioned.
The upstream open-source Linux kernel developers weren't really in favor of this change to allow non-GPL drivers access to DMA-BUF. However, one of the developers involved with DMA-BUF, Rob Clark of Texas Instruments, has more positive news to now share. Below is the message he posted to the kernel mailing list
on Sunday concerning this DMA-BUF licensing.
We discussed this topic at the kernel-gfx mini-summit at ELC. Following the discussion, I agree that dma-buf infrastructure is intended as an interface between driver subsystems. And because (for now) all the other arm SoC gl(es) stacks unfortunately involve a closed src userspace, and since I consider userspace and kernel as tightly coupled in the realm of graphics stacks, I don't think we can really claim the moral high-ground here. So I can't object to use of EXPORT_SYMBOL() instead of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL().
That said, I expect the dma-buf infrastructure to still be evolving and it is the responsibility for out-of-tree users of the API (GPL or otherwise) to adapt as the dma-buf API changes. And there isn't much the in-tree drivers can do when it comes to debugging of buffer sharing issues with out-of-tree drivers (binary or otherwise), leaving the debugging responsibility to the owners of different out-of-tree drivers.
This would be marked as a win for NVIDIA (and potentially AMD, among others) as well as Linux desktop users just looking for the best supported hardware experience, assuming this export symbol change goes through.