1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Intel Is Planning To Drop PowerVR Graphics

Intel

Published on 07 February 2012 01:12 PM EST
Written by Michael Larabel in Intel
22 Comments

There's some more exciting Intel news to report this week that will please plenty of Linux and open-source fans: Intel is planning to drop their use of Imagination Technologies PowerVR graphics within future-generation SoCs.

Going back to the original GMA500, a.k.a. the very notorious Poulsbo, Intel relied upon Imagination Technologies and their PowerVR SGX graphics core for their low-power Atom SoCs. Intel didn't use any in-house graphics core for Poulsbo and newer hardware like Moorestown and Medfield since they didn't have anything to compete in terms of great performance on an extremely low-power budget.

This has been a big mess especially for Linux users since Intel isn't allowed to provide an open-source driver (or any documentation) since they don't own control over the graphics IP and Imagination Technologies generally isn't an open-source friendly firm. PowerVR graphics have been a mess under Linux for not only Intel but also for the multiple other vendors relying upon the very common PowerVR technology within their hardware.

The good news for Intel customers is that it looks like Intel's planning to do away with this graphics IP in an upcoming SoC and replace it with their own in-house graphics core that can compete in the very-low-power segment while boasting respective OpenGL performance and other capabilities.

Intel didn't have the abilities back with Poulsbo to beat out the PowerVR SGX in terms of performance at the same power level, but it looks like they're finally hitting -- or exceeding -- their internal marks with future hardware. When it comes to original Intel graphics, Sandy Bridge is now really great (especially after a year of remarkable driver optimizations), Ivy Bridge can be as twice as fast as current-gen Sandy parts while not increasing the thermal envelope, and Haswell is sounding beautiful with the 2013 desktop parts potentially competing with mid-to-high-end discrete graphics processors.

Based upon information from different sources, it looks like Intel is planning to trim down a "Gen7" (Ivy Bridge) graphics core and lodging it on a future SoC. It would make sense that Intel would be looking to avoid its dependence on using Imagination's low-power graphics technology that's used by so many competing ARM SoC vendors.

If Intel can manage to deliver viable Intel-inside graphics within a near-future SoC across power, performance, and features, they may be able to attract more device vendors instead of ARM. With in-house graphics hopefully leveraging their existing and mature driver code-base, they would also be able to have an advantage on the driver side, especially if the support is available to everyone as open-source.

This work would also jive with what the Intel OTC desktop team has been doing on bettering the Mesa library support for Google's Android, advancing Tizen (the MeeGo successor) and its planned use of Wayland -- which necessitates a better driver than the current Poulsbo crap, etc.

The future SoC that's expected to introduce the new graphics is "Silvermont" and expected availability by early 2013. Before the exciting Silvermont there is expected to be the "Clover Trail" Atoms released this calendar year, but it doesn't sound like that SoC will bear new graphics capabilities. I hope to have some more details soon and am very excited to see Intel do away with the PowerVR graphics and its horrific driver support.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. 13-Way Low-End GPU Comparison With AMD's AM1 Athlon
  2. ASUS AM1I-A: A Mini-ITX Board For Socketed Kabini APUs
  3. Mini-Box M350: A Simple, Affordable Mini-ITX Case
  4. Overclocking The AMD AM1 Athlon & Sempron APUs
Latest Linux Articles
  1. How Much Video RAM Is Needed For Catalyst R3 Graphics?
  2. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS vs. 14.04 LTS Cloud Benchmarks
  3. Ubuntu 12.04.4 vs. 13.10 vs. 14.04 LTS Desktop Benchmarks
  4. AMD OpenCL Performance With AM1 Kabini APUs
Latest Linux News
  1. Linux 3.15 Lands Some DRM Graphics Driver Fixes
  2. AMD Is Disabling DPM Support For RV770 GPUs
  3. ReactOS Working On A Community Windows OS
  4. Borderlands Is Being Considered For Linux
  5. Mesa 10.0 & 10.1 Stable Get Updated
  6. Getting Hit By The Variable Performance Of The Public Cloud
  7. Git 2.0 Test Releases Begin With Many Changes
  8. Wine 1.7.17 Works On Its Task Scheduler, C Run-Time
  9. The Improv ARM Board Still Isn't Shipping; Riding A Dead Horse?
  10. Debian To Maintain 6.0 Squeeze As An LTS Release
  11. Wasteland 2 Is Finally Released For Linux Gamers
  12. FreeBSD Advances For ARM, Bhyve, Clang
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  2. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  3. Catalyst 14.3 Beta
  4. Suggestions about how to make a Radeon HD 7790 work decently?
  5. Radeon 8000M problematic on Linux?
  6. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  7. After Jack Keane, RuseSoft will briing Ankh 3 to Linux through Desura
  8. Suspected PHP Proxy Issue