Phoronix IRC Log: 2009-01-24

^6wl: morning all, quick question, does anyone have the intel DG45FC, and has anyone had any luck with HDMI audio?
Ivanovic: michaellarabel: re the r700 2d performance test: what are the results with a slower cpu?
Ivanovic: since i could imagine that lots of features are so far not implemented in the open drivers, those are most likely done by the cpu only
Ivanovic: and you were using a cpu with a damn fast "single process" speed
Ivanovic: how do the results looks at the default speed of 3ghz or even at a speed of 2ghz
Ivanovic: would be interesting to see the 4 results in parallel
Ivanovic: so speed of r700 radeonhd at 4ghz cpu and 2ghz cpu as well as fglrx with both cpu speeds
^6wl: right, step up
^6wl: hdmi audio is working on the console
^6wl: just not in X
^6wl: I'm running 2.6.1 xf86-video-intel
Kano: hmm
^6wl: anyone know if there is anything you need to do to enable HDMI audio that was added in 2.6.0 of the drivers?
maligor: might be a different device
maligor: different audio device that is
maligor: ^6wl, using alsa 1.0.19?
^6wl: yeah, using alsa 1.0.19 and 2.6.29-rc2-git
^6wl: the audio works fine in the console
^6wl: just not in X
Kano: ^6wl: do you use dsp or alsa output
^6wl: alsa
Kano: did you ask in #intel-gfx ?
^6wl: yeah, its been all silent so far
^6wl: was hoping the leets here would know =)
Kano: well i do not even own a tv with hdmi nor an intel board with hdmi connector
Kano: dont know if somebody else does here
^6wl: =) this is my htpc project
Kano: how about using a cheap gf 9300 with hdmi?
^6wl: not open source drivers
Kano: does not matter, but h264 via vdpau
^6wl: i refuse to get another nvidia after every they depreciated 2 video cards I owned
^6wl: and didn't upgrade the legacy drivers to support the latest X abi
Kano: well only 71.xx series does not work
Kano: they have got 3 legacy drivers, 2 work with 1.6
^6wl: maybe it was the kernel, cant remember off the top of my head
Kano: what card do you own?
^6wl: 5200
^6wl: and a 5900 I think it is
Kano: 173.xx is supported
^6wl: had to ditch the 5200 for something or other
Kano: if you can not use it is your fault
^6wl: then the 5900 didn't work with > 2,6,26 I think it was
Kano: forget it
^6wl: forget what?
Kano: if you would use kanotix they work after calling 2 scripts
Kano: you use the wrong distro
^6wl: yeah, thats it
redeeman: you can naturally get the patches applied in any distribution
redeeman: ey kano, i got a small issue, maybe you've had it too
Kano: currently you dont need any patches
redeeman: after i upgraded to 180.22 drivers, kde remote desktop process krfb crashes after i log off the vnc session
Kano: redeeman: i only use x11vnc/vncviewer not krfb
redeeman: why not krfb?
Kano: because of the listen mode
Kano: i add a portforward to my system and those who need help do not need a portforward
redeeman: you mean so server can contact client?
redeeman: ah
redeeman: but that's for the client
Kano: they call: x11vnc -connect ip
redeeman: you could still use krfb
Kano: i call: vncviewer -bgr233 -listen
^6wl: well, just went to the nvidia site to checkout if the 5200 was support (prefer that card cos its passively cooled) - "System Message, Please try again at a later time"
^6wl: I'll stick with intel and fully open source thanks
Kano: which distro do you use?
^6wl: gentoo
Kano: cant you emerge it?
Kano: 173.14.15 is the driver you would need
^6wl: yeah, im sure there was a change in the > 2.6.26 kernel header with the last supported version
Kano: forget it
Kano: that works without patch even for 2.6.28
^6wl: again, forget what
Kano: i support all nvidia cards since ages. if there are patches needed in most cases nvidia provides em, at last for 180/173. for 96/71 i backported some myself
Kano: but for hdmi you would need something from series 9
Kano: which has a header to connect spdif from board
^6wl: well, fingers crossed I get this working, since i've got it working in console, assume its not far away from working in x
^6wl: got it all working
mib_euw1z5: cls
redeeman: so...
redeeman: which is the ati chipset which has R500 based graphics which is supported?
redeeman: was it 690g that's the newest supported or?
redeeman: im thinking of getting myself a phenom 2 box
mib_euw1z5: Ahh
mib_euw1z5: Phenom 2
mib_euw1z5: Excellent choice sir
mib_euw1z5: You want integrated graphics?
mib_euw1z5: Hmmm
redeeman: well.. i don't really need fast graphics on the box, so why not, i figure
RobbieAB: redeeman: which OS?
redeeman: linux ofcourse
mib_euw1z5: I do believe that 690g has R500
mib_euw1z5: Which distribution is probably what he meant...
redeeman: i don't see what distribution matters - i can get the software on any one
RobbieAB: If you don't need 3d, integrated is best bet. If you are prepared to run experimental X and drivers, any chipset should just about function
redeeman: i do want 3d, but i also know that there is one integrated that is R500 based and supported
GNU\colossus: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_690G
RobbieAB: Well, 2D runs on the R6/700 and 3D should arrive in the next 6 months...
GNU\colossus: The IGP's 3D architecture is based on Radeon R420 and contains 4 pixel pipelines capable of Shader Model version 2.0b with DirectX 9 and OpenGL 2.0 compatibility but lacks hardware vertex processing.
RobbieAB: And for Phenom II you might do better waiting for the AM3 chipsets. ;)
redeeman: RobbieAB: i don't give much for the "should"
GNU\colossus: it's a pity that AMD's southbridges suck so much
revx: oh really?
RobbieAB: redeeman: Yeah, I know that feeling. But if you can bear to wait, AM3 should offer a better system than AM+
revx: GNU\colossus: I've had no issues with the SB600 series
redeeman: revx: i hear usb sucks, and ncq is non existent or buggy?
revx: GNU\colossus: in fact I like it quite a bit!
GNU\colossus: revx: well, SB600's USB2 transfer speed, for example, is abysmal
revx: I've had far worse.. *remembers the days of his VIA chipsets and shivers*
GNU\colossus: I've never had problems with VIA ;)
redeeman: usb2 gets good speeds on my via chipset
GNU\colossus: but with nforce3... oh boy.
mib_euw1z5: I've had BIG problems with VIA
revx: mib_euw1z5: same
mib_euw1z5: KT 133 and KT333 chipsets were aweful
Ivanovic: michaellarabel: around?
Ivanovic: oaky, probably it is michaellarabel_ by now
GNU\colossus: kt333 was a-ok :)
RobbieAB: VIA needs a LOT of work done on their chipsets, as they need to seriously boost the memory speed.
mib_euw1z5: LOL
mib_euw1z5: Are you $%^*#$^*# me?!?!?!
RobbieAB: has a HP 2133
revx: ROFL
michaellarabel_: hi ivanovic
mib_euw1z5: KT333 was incompatible with ANY ram
mib_euw1z5: lol
Ivanovic: michaellarabel_: could you also run the 2d r700 benchmarks with with a slower cpu?
michaellarabel_: When I have the time
Ivanovic: would be nice to see how the driver does scale
Ivanovic: cf my comment from about 10h ago
RobbieAB: With decent memory speed, it would be VERY nice system if I was doing dmcrypt with AES
mib_euw1z5: Does memory speed have that much of an impact with phenom?
mib_euw1z5: I thought that the real life situations benefitted very little with anything faster than DDR400
maligor: GNU\colossus, wasn't KT333 the one with half the pci broken
mib_euw1z5: KT333 is the one they pretended never existed
GNU\colossus: maligor: if you're recalling the pain with high loads on the PCI-Bus when using emu10k1 soundcards - that was KT133, actually
RobbieAB: mib_euw1z5: memory speed is more important with the multicore CPUs.
maligor: GNU\colossus, oh, it wasn't just emu10k1 soundcards
maligor: GNU\colossus, half of the pci bus was actually broken
maligor: it's one of those WTF designs
mib_euw1z5: My KT133 was excellent apart from Non USB compliant USB
mib_euw1z5: I also had a ISA slot in it
maligor: they work fine as long as you don't use half the pci slots :P
mib_euw1z5: So I could use my US robotics 56k
mib_euw1z5: Only modem to connect at 50.666 speed at the time
maligor: speed of the devil, eh
mib_euw1z5: Yes
mib_euw1z5: Slightly faster than 48.333
RobbieAB: maligor: so they don't work as a desktop, but in laptops and the like, they are ok?
maligor: RobbieAB, Never had one of those
maligor: if the HP 2133 has no problems, then it has no problems :P
RobbieAB: It has problems, there is what looks like a weird bug in the PCI system... It may be the library though.
maligor: They sold them at one shop here for 150eur at one point, which I only noticed afterwards :P
maligor: via does have some cool tech stuff, like Via Padlock
RobbieAB: Yes, which is memory bound
maligor: the laptop has padlock?
RobbieAB: VERY VERY VERY memory bound, if their theoretical figures are to be believed
RobbieAB: Yes, all C7-M have padlock
maligor: benched it yourself then?
RobbieAB: Seen enough non-Via figures
RobbieAB: Via say 25Gb/s AES speeds, most non-Via benchmarks are saying 800Mb/s as peak.
maligor: so 100MB/s?
maligor: that's pretty decent
RobbieAB: Yes, but with faster memory...
redeeman: a single E8400 core does 100MB/s
maligor: redeeman, and the point is?-)
redeeman: so if that's what they reach with dedicated silicon, im not impressed
maligor: huh?
redeeman: the via stuff?
GNU\colossus: are we talking bits or bytes?
RobbieAB: redeeman: that's on a 1.5GHz clock as well...
maligor: C7-M is a mobile chip
maligor: you can compare it to atom rather than a friggen E8400
RobbieAB: The basic problem padlock has is getting the data to the chip fast enough.
redeeman: maligor: but if it has a dedicated piece of hardware for the encryption stuff...
RobbieAB: It looks like the AES benches are choking on the memory bandwidth
maligor: and?
RobbieAB: redeeman: what clock is that E8400? What power draw?
maligor: E8400 is a 3.0GHz top of the line dual core
maligor: I mean jeez
redeeman: i don't think you understand what it is im saying
maligor: you're comparing it to a lowpower mobile part
maligor: no, i don't
RobbieAB: So a single core chip, clocked at 50%, drawing a fraction of the power, is competitive, and it's not pretty good?
redeeman: what im saying is, that if a general purpose cpu, with a software aes implementation, granted, on a very fast cpu, can match dedicated encryption logic, im not impressed, even if that dedicated logic is contained in a much slower cpu
ZeXx86: Hi
RobbieAB: redeeman: that general purpose CPU is CPU limited on AES, NOT memory limited
maligor: 1.5GHz C7-M is 12Watts
maligor: that's on 90nm tech
ZeXx86: Is possible to start hunting for UT3 Linux Client informations ? Its not normal to wait years for this game port
RobbieAB: Improve the memory performance for the Via chip, and watch that benchmark grow.
mib_euw1z5: Normal, probably not, common... I suppose it is
redeeman: the atom does 20MB/s AES
redeeman: in software
redeeman: 256bit
mib_euw1z5: redeeman: Then perhaps VIA should have been making CPU's the whole time
redeeman: i wonder what the amd geode companion chip does in speed, for it's 128bit aes
maligor: lots of embedded devices have crypto engines
maligor: 800Mb/s means you can saturate a gigabit network with encrypted data
mib_euw1z5: Which would do what exactly?
RobbieAB: pretty impressive for a cheap, 12W CPU, don't you think?
mib_euw1z5: http://h71016.www7.hp.com/dstore/ctoBases.asp?BEID=19701&ProductLineId=539&oi=E9CED&FamilyId=2769&LowPrice=%24729.00&LowBaseId=23430&jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN#
mib_euw1z5: 650$ for HP2133 with SLED
RobbieAB: ok...
RobbieAB: Now lets me see... I got my 2133 forr 350Eur, and they are currently hipping in IE for 300...
RobbieAB: Ok, that's with 1GB ram, and a 1.2GHz chip, but...
RobbieAB: That is the 1280x768 display btw, which is probably a better bet. :)
mib_euw1z5: I find it's a bit expensive
mib_euw1z5: And I'm woondering about the graphics
mib_euw1z5: VIA Chrome 9, 128MB shared system memory
mib_euw1z5: Is Chrome really good at something? Frome what I've gathered it's not very powerful, but then again for a system like that, energy consumption is probably what's best
mib_euw1z5: Nice
mib_euw1z5: The one I'm looking at doesn't have that resolution
mib_euw1z5: 1024x600 I believe
RobbieAB: Also, you really don't want SLED on it.
mib_euw1z5: Why not?
RobbieAB: You want something lighter.
mib_euw1z5: What would you recommend?
RobbieAB: I'm running gentoo on it, once I got it set-up, I build over night.
RobbieAB: It's nice enough in use.
mib_euw1z5: I see
RobbieAB: Basically, you don't want a current SLED for the same reason you don't want Vista.
mib_euw1z5: Right
mib_euw1z5: Although I did get my mac G3 running with OpenSuse 10
RobbieAB: It's too heavy for a lightweight machine. XP or something that runs trimmed down is going to be a nicer experience.
mib_euw1z5: AND KDE4
RobbieAB: Well, if you are happy with that level of responsiveness, disregard my comments. ;)
mib_euw1z5: I wasn't thrilled
mib_euw1z5: But I was excited to see that it did run
mib_euw1z5: lol
mib_euw1z5: I need to re-install because I fubared it
RobbieAB: Yeah, that's kind of the point, you want to use the system much, you'll want something responsive.
RobbieAB: That said, if you really know your way around Suse, you may be able to strip a SLED down easier than getting anything else working
mib_euw1z5: How lightweight is XFCE anyway?
mib_euw1z5: Compared to KDE4
RobbieAB: Depends how much of KDE4 you use, I suspect.
RobbieAB: If you use KDE4, with FF as your browser, TB as your email client, OOo for your office software, XFCE4 will be lighter.
mib_euw1z5: I see
mib_euw1z5: Looking at the screenshots, it looks pretty stripped down
RobbieAB: If you use KDE4, and non-KDE4 apps, it's going to be a lot more competitive.
RobbieAB: But the minute you install The Gimp, or FF, ...
RobbieAB: I run with only one Qt app installed, and that's statically linked, so I have no Qt or KDE libs installed.
mib_euw1z5: Mhmm
RobbieAB: (The Qt app is Skype!)
RobbieAB: There is also LXDE (For the ultra lightweight approach)
mib_euw1z5: Sounds good
mib_euw1z5: It's an older system with probably 1/3 the power of your 2133 :P
mib_euw1z5: ATI Rage 128
mib_euw1z5: lol
mib_euw1z5: :)
RobbieAB: lol, so about comparable with my 3 PIII 500s
RobbieAB: Same graphics as well...
mib_euw1z5: Yup
RobbieAB: I got a stripped GNOME running on the PIII
maligor: 1.3GB the whole system is using here with kde4 and a few apps running :P
mib_euw1z5: Although I think PPC 400mhz may be a little more performant than a P3 500
RobbieAB: Not the most responsive system I've ever used, but certainly usable
maligor: weird having 1.5GB in caches
mib_euw1z5: Cool
mib_euw1z5: On you 2133 or P3?
RobbieAB: the P3.
maligor: KDE 4.2 is pretty sweet
mib_euw1z5: Wow
RobbieAB: That's one benefit of gentoo... ;)
RobbieAB: Once the build is done, with properly targetted CFLAGs, it does give better performance.
RobbieAB: -march=pentium3 is great ;)
maligor: not a whole lot
maligor: not on recent systems anyway
RobbieAB: Less noticable on recent systems, partly because the 64bit binary distros all build with much the same flags gentoo users would use anyway.
RobbieAB: But -march=pentium3 should beat -march=686 on a P3 ;)
maligor: have you compared?
maligor: as in: empirical study
maligor: before you do, that statement is pretty meaningless
RobbieAB: I haven't benched, no.
RobbieAB: But to say that renders the comment worthless is to ignore the whole point of the march flag
RobbieAB: Which every gentoo dev I have spoken to has said is the single most important optimising flag.
mib_euw1z5: What does the march flag do??
maligor: pentium3 just enables MMX and SSE
mib_euw1z5: Ohhh
maligor: mib_euw1z5, instruction sets
maligor: it's entirely a different question on how well gcc can use them
mib_euw1z5: I'll got with RobbieAB and his hyppothsis
mib_euw1z5: I'll put 5 space bucks on it
maligor: recent gcc versions do have auto-vectorization features too
maligor: but it's not enabled by default
maligor: and I really wouldn't use them for compiling main systems :P
RobbieAB: maligor: It's more than just instruction sets, hence the distinction between mtune and march
RobbieAB: If it was JUST instruction sets, the distinction wouldn't exist.
maligor: you could try compiling something with both flags and disassembling them
maligor: hmm.. I might just have the thing to test it
mib_euw1z5: I would assume that -march=686 would be much slower if the software decides to rely on CPU instruction sets that are really not there
mib_euw1z5: Possibly freezing
RobbieAB: mib_euw1z5: if it's trying to use cpu instructions that aren't there, it should crash
RobbieAB: However, it's also a matter of scheduling. If there are any scheduling differences between a pentium3 and a pentium4 (for example) march with tell the compiler to take them into account.
RobbieAB: As will mtune
maligor: RobbieAB, I be surprised
maligor: it does generate slightly different results
RobbieAB: :)
maligor: one 'mov' was replaced by a 'or'
RobbieAB: This is something small, I take it?
maligor: and there's 'inc' instead of 'add 0x1'
maligor: dunno really what the differences between execution cycles they take are
RobbieAB: probably marginal.
maligor: but since it's just a few odd instructions, you'd have to run the whole thing millions of times
maligor: it was just a simple euler solver tho
maligor: my analysis could be flawed, I'm too lazy to read the longer solvers
maligor: hmm... diff to the rescue
RobbieAB: However, I suspect that it tries to make it so that more complex programs can context switch easily, which is very CPU specific... ;)
RobbieAB: I will be the first to admit I have no clue how to check for something like that though.
RobbieAB: On such matters I bow to the superiour knowledge of the GCC coders.
mib_euw1z5: superiour eh?
mib_euw1z5: :P
RobbieAB: Hey, I never said I could speel
mib_euw1z5: lol :)
maligor: I'll just bow down to the superior knowledge of the amd engineers who designed amd64
RobbieAB: That works. The other critical flag used on x86 is mfpmath=sse, which is enabled by default on 64bit systems
maligor: I wonder how useful that is with SSE1 only
RobbieAB: Standard, sane, flags: -march=<> -O2, -mfpmath=sse
maligor: -funroll-loops!
maligor: I'd leave O levels to the apps
RobbieAB: Moderately useful, as a lot of graphics work and multimedia work will use float, and not double.
maligor: tried running kde4 on that p3?
RobbieAB: Not yet, it could be fun
maligor: this thing has more bling than vista
maligor: 4.2 anyway, and I'm surprised how good it is
revx: I wait for the day when gcc can figure out stuff like this:
RobbieAB: But I'm not a KDE user, and I never bothered even trying to get the graphics chip working properly
revx: float a[3], b[3]; a or b could be stored in a sse reg
revx: added, scaled, etc
revx: and subject to other optimizations
revx: you can do this with the SIMD types
maligor: SIMD stuff tend to want aligned values
revx: but GCC can't see this without explicitly using non-standard types
maligor: I think it had unaligned ops too tho, but they take a hit
RobbieAB: funroll-loops should rarely be used as a system wide cflag
maligor: I had fun writing SSE assembler at one point
revx: maligor: indeed.. actualy a change for AMD Phenom II is that the prefetch SSE2 instructions can now take unaligned addresses!
maligor: to get good results you have to pretty much have the whole app using aligned
RobbieAB: march is safe (basically, any code it breaks is already broken), -O2 is also generally safe, and a generally sane "default" optimisation flag
maligor: so it's a pita if it's a old program :P
revx: unaligned random access is bad
revx: but unaligned streaming access only has a small penalty
maligor: RobbieAB, I've seen programs that explictly didn't use O2 because it breaks something
maligor: it was a while back tho
RobbieAB: -O3 is silly, and can sometimes actually degrade performance. sometimes -Os can beat -O2.
maligor: -O99
revx: maligor: well O2 breaks stuff on different arches
revx: maligor: in gcc on k10, it doesn't do anything "unsafe" but O3 does
revx: unless you have some extreme hackery :P
RobbieAB: maligor: Oh, yes, but the few programs that break with -O2 will tend to have a flag filter on distro build systems
RobbieAB: So everything else builds with it sanely.
revx: RobbieAB: how many source based distros with build systems do you know of?
RobbieAB: revx: Gentoo, not sure of any other large source distros.
maligor: OE/Angstrom is another big name
RobbieAB: But if it's to be a distro, it needs a build system, I would have thought.
maligor: it's a embedded setup tho
RobbieAB: Also, don't most binary distros build their apps with -O2?
RobbieAB: Except for the few apps that don't, of course.
maligor: in debian it depends on the mood of the package builder
RobbieAB: won't comment on that.
RobbieAB: And She Who Feeds Me is calling, so later.
mib_euw1z5: Later
mib_euw1z5: I feed she
mib_euw1z5: She does dishes
mib_euw1z5: :D
mib_euw1z5: I and she are going to drink tonight :P
Roberth1: hmm im trying to play return to castle wolfenstein here, but the game cant open /dev/dsp so I get no sound, anyone know about any workaround?
Kano: you can use alsa with it
Roberth1: how do I set that?
Kano: you can do two things
Kano: first you can try
Kano: echo "et.x86 0 0 direct" > /proc/asound/card0/pcm0p/oss
Kano: and then execute the game
Kano: echo "et.x86 0 0 direct" > /proc/asound/card0/pcm0p/oss
Roberth1: that didnt give much sound
Kano: well the first is the executealbe name
Roberth1: they are both the same
Roberth1: but isnt et another game?
Kano: nope
evocallaghan: Hi
Kano: hi evocallaghan
evocallaghan: :)
evocallaghan: Hows things?
RobbieAB: Good
evocallaghan: michaellarabel: You about buddy ?
Roberth1: Kano: yes it is
Roberth1: Kano: i had to use echo 'wolfsp.x86 0 0 direct' > /proc/asound/card0/pcm0p/oss
Kano: ok, but you the idea ;)
Kano: got
Roberth1: uh the zombie/demon is scary:S
Roberth1: *part*
Kano: michaellarabel: did you ever test nvidia drivers on U 9.04?
Kano: for xserver 1.6 only ignoreABi is needed, just added that hack to my script
Kano: as my ati card is damaged, i could not test a similar thing for ati
Kano: if somebody has a u 9.04 install with ssh running i could test it
Kano: i put that part into a script, anybody likes to try?
Kano: or send me a working ati pci-e card ;)
Kano: mine has gfx errors even in bios
Kano: flash is still really slow in fullsize with 64 bit...
Kano: anybody awake?
RobbieAB: No
michaellarabel: Kano: I don't have any ATI systems running Ubuntu 9.04 right now
Kano: then try it live
Kano: should not matter
Kano: or install ssh on one system in live mode and let me connect
Kano: well most easy way would be a modded fglrx script i guess

< Phoronix IRC Home

Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  2. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  3. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  4. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
Latest Linux News
  1. Freedreno Gallium3D Now Banging The Adreno A3XX
  2. Jolla Announces Their First Phone
  3. Mageia 3 Released, Still Using Legacy GRUB
  4. NetBSD 6.1 Brings In More Features
  5. Using Six Monitors With AMD's Open-Source Linux Driver
  6. Benchmarking The Intel P-State, CPUfreq Changes
  7. FreeBSD Still Working On Next-Gen Package Manager
  8. DNF Still Advancing As Experimental Yum For Fedora
  9. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  10. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed With
  11. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Jolla Announces Their First Phone
  2. Using Six Monitors With AMD's Open-Source Linux...
  3. Features Being Developed For KDE 4.11 Desktop
  4. What is the breakdown of ad revenue vs paid...
  5. X3: Albion Prelude Released For Linux Gamers
  6. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed...
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite