Benchmarks Of ZFS-FUSE On Linux Against EXT4, Btrfs

Published on August 30, 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 5 of 5
Discuss This Article

As some Phoronix Premium members have requested CPU usage results during file-system tests, there are some included in this article.

As shown above, the CPU utilization for the Intel Core i7 was actually higher than that when ZFS-FUSE on Linux was being used or when OpenSolaris was being run with its native ZFS implementation.

While the CPU load was lower when using ZFS-FUSE during the PostMark benchmark, the difference was only a few percent. When running Apache, the CPU usage spiked dramatically and was much higher than that of the native Linux file-systems that were tested to the point that it was almost three times greater.

There is certainly a performance penalty incurred when using ZFS-FUSE on Linux, which may or may not be justified depending upon whether you take advantage of any other features found in the Oracle/Sun ZFS file-system. Even with the very latest Linux 2.6.36 kernel and both the latest stable and unstable releases of the ZFS-FUSE code-base, a significant drop in performance can be measured when running ZFS in user-space. It will be interesting though to see how the native ZFS Linux module from either the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory or KQ Infotech performs compared to ZFS-FUSE. Even the native ZFS module on OpenSolaris was no match to Linux and EXT4/Btrfs, so our next set of native ZFS Linux results should be rather interesting. It could be argued that those OpenSolaris-compatible test profiles just so happened to be bottlenecked elsewhere in the Solaris Nevada kernel, but even ZFS on FreeBSD is slow when compared to the EXT4 and Btrfs file-systems. These next ZFS on Linux results will be available in September if the native ZFS beta code arrives prior to the annual Oktoberfest outing -- stay tuned for this year's Phoronix gathering details.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.

5
Next Page >>
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  2. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  3. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  4. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
Latest Linux News
  1. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  2. Intel Ultrabook Performance Is Faster With Mesa 9.2
  3. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
  4. Phoronix Test Suite 4.6.0 "Utsira" Released
  5. New Intel X.Org Driver Supports All Of Haswell
  6. SQLite Now Faster With Memory Mapped I/O
  7. Microsoft Releases Skype For Linux 4.2, Has Bug-Fixes
  8. Qt For Tizen Launches, Based On Qt 5.1
  9. KTAP Released For Linux Kernel Dynamic Tracing
  10. Linux 3.10-rc2 Kernel Takes In A Few Extra Pulls
  11. QEMU 1.5 Supports VGA Passthrough, Better USB 3.0
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Kubuntu, KDE Has Little Hope For Ubuntu's Mir
  2. FreeBSD Still Working On Next-Gen Package Manager
  3. Question for BSD Users :Why do you use Bsd?
  4. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
  5. Microsoft Releases Skype For Linux 4.2, Has...
  6. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite