1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The Wayland Situation: Facts About X vs. Wayland

Eric Griffith

Published on 7 June 2013
Written by Eric Griffith
Page 4 of 4 - 282 Comments

A Few Generic Advantages Of Wayland

I) “Every frame is perfect.” Wayland's main goal is that no matter the system load, no matter what is going on, it will be flicker free, tear free, and flash free. Every frame is presented in the correct and proper order (dropping frames is fine, but you wont get frame 199, followed by 205, followed by 200 because they all got sent at roughly the same time and the server picked them at random). Wayland knows what order they came in, what order they need to be displayed in, and knows WHEN they were displayed because EVERYTHING has a timestamp associated with it.

II) Minimal!!! We've learned the hard way what happens when you have something do a lot of things that also has to maintain backwards compatibility-- 26yr old mistakes are still biting us in the ass TODAY with X. Let the clients handle things, they can change-- they can break things all they want because its THEM who has to deal with the fallout of that breakage. We're helping to future-proof Wayland by reducing the surface-area for mistakes.

III) Hardware specific backends. I'm sure some people saw that the Rasberry Pi got a Wayland specific backend, and how it allowed the hardware to be taken advantage of more fully. It wont be necessary for all things, most things WONT need a hardware-specific backend...but it sure its nice to have it available. It means we have freedom, we have choice to make specific tweaks if we need to. Or if we realize down the road that the main backend has some architectural flaw in it, we can change it out with one that doesn't.

~Fin~

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Even With Re-Clocking, Nouveau Remains Behind NVIDIA's Proprietary Linux Driver
  2. The Power Consumption & Efficiency Of Open-Source GPU Drivers
  3. AMD R600g/RadeonSI Performance On Linux 3.16 With Mesa 10.3-devel
  4. Intel Pentium G3258 On Linux
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Nouveau vs. Radeon vs. Intel Tests On Linux 3.16, Mesa 10.3-devel
  2. KVM Benchmarks On Ubuntu 14.10
  3. X.Org Server 1.16 Officially Released With Terrific Features
  4. Ubuntu With Linux 3.16 Smashes OS X 10.9.4 On The MacBook Air
Latest Linux News
  1. The FFmpeg vs. Libav War Continues In Debian Land
  2. Grand Theft Auto Running On Direct3D Natively On Linux Shows Gallium3D Potential
  3. GCC As A Just-In Time Compiler Is An Interesting Project
  4. Age Of Wonders III Is Still Being Ported To Linux
  5. Git 2.1 To Further Mainline Windows Support Patches
  6. Debian 8.0 Jessie Is Settling For Linux 3.16
  7. Meson: A Next-Gen Build System Showing Promise
  8. Linux 3.16-rc7 Calms Things Down For The Linux 3.16 Kernel
  9. Open-Source AMD Users Report Hawaii GPU Acceleration Is Working
  10. Linus Torvalds On GCC 4.9: Pure & Utter Crap
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. List of Linux friendly Kickstarter projects
  2. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  3. Linus Torvalds On GCC 4.9: Pure & Utter Crap
  4. Porting Mesa to the Playstation 2
  5. ASRock AM1H-ITX: One Of The Best AM1 Mini-ITX Motherboards
  6. Debian + radeonsi
  7. Open-source drivers on ATI R7 260X
  8. Table test