1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The Wayland Situation: Facts About X vs. Wayland

Eric Griffith

Published on 7 June 2013
Written by Eric Griffith
Page 4 of 4 - 282 Comments

A Few Generic Advantages Of Wayland

I) “Every frame is perfect.” Wayland's main goal is that no matter the system load, no matter what is going on, it will be flicker free, tear free, and flash free. Every frame is presented in the correct and proper order (dropping frames is fine, but you wont get frame 199, followed by 205, followed by 200 because they all got sent at roughly the same time and the server picked them at random). Wayland knows what order they came in, what order they need to be displayed in, and knows WHEN they were displayed because EVERYTHING has a timestamp associated with it.

II) Minimal!!! We've learned the hard way what happens when you have something do a lot of things that also has to maintain backwards compatibility-- 26yr old mistakes are still biting us in the ass TODAY with X. Let the clients handle things, they can change-- they can break things all they want because its THEM who has to deal with the fallout of that breakage. We're helping to future-proof Wayland by reducing the surface-area for mistakes.

III) Hardware specific backends. I'm sure some people saw that the Rasberry Pi got a Wayland specific backend, and how it allowed the hardware to be taken advantage of more fully. It wont be necessary for all things, most things WONT need a hardware-specific backend...but it sure its nice to have it available. It means we have freedom, we have choice to make specific tweaks if we need to. Or if we realize down the road that the main backend has some architectural flaw in it, we can change it out with one that doesn't.

~Fin~

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 & E5-2687W v3 Compared To The Core i7 5960X On Linux
  2. Intel 120GB 530 Series SSD Linux Performance
  3. Btrfs/EXT4/XFS/F2FS RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Linux Benchmarks On Four SSDs
  4. AMD's Windows Catalyst Driver Remains Largely Faster Than Linux Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers With Linux 3.18 + Mesa 10.4-devel
  2. Is The Open-Source NVIDIA Driver Fast Enough For Steam On Linux Gaming?
  3. Linux 3.18 File-System Performance Minimally Changed But Possible Regressions
  4. AMD Radeon Gallium3D Is Catching Up & Sometimes Beating Catalyst On Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. There's New In-Fighting Over The Future Of Compiz
  2. GTK+ Inspector Gains More Features Ahead Of GNOME 3.16
  3. Clang 3.6 Will Hopefully Have OpenMP Support
  4. A Go Front-End Could Soon Be Landing In LLVM
  5. Linux 3.18-rc6 Released, A Worrisome Regression Remains
  6. HandBrake 0.10 Brings H.265 & VP8 Encoders
  7. Gngr: A New Web Browser Focused On Privacy
  8. Linux 3.18 Kernel: Not Much Change With Intel Haswell Performance
  9. More File-System Tests Of The Linux 3.18 Kernel
  10. Using NVIDIA's NVENC On Linux With FFmpeg
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. how to configure module phoromatic ?
  2. PulseAudio 6.0 Is Coming & Other Linux Audio Plans For The Future
  3. Debian Developer Resigns From The Systemd Maintainership Team
  4. Roadmap to Catalyst 14.10 ?
  5. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  6. Cant get working Kaveri APU - A10-7850k
  7. Script for Fan Speed Control
  8. Debian Init System Coupling Vote Results