1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs Ubuntu Netbook Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 19 February 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 5 - 46 Comments

Last month we published benchmarks of EXT4 comparing this file-system's performance when it was first marked stable in the mainline kernel and then where it is at now in the Linux kernel while testing every major release in between. This article was followed up by a Btrfs versus EXT4 comparison using the Linux 2.6.33 kernel to see how the two most talked about Linux file-systems are battling it out with the latest kernel. After those Linux file-system benchmarks were published, we received a request from Canonical to look at the EXT3 performance too. With that said, we have done just that and have published EXT3, EXT4, and Btrfs benchmarks from Ubuntu 9.10 and a Ubuntu 10.04 development snapshot from an Intel Atom netbook.

For this round of testing we used a Samsung NC10 netbook that was loaded with an Intel Atom N270 CPU clocked at 1.60GHz, an Intel 945GME + ICH7-M motherboard with integrated graphics, 2GB of DDR2-533MHz system memory, and an 32GB OCZ Core Series SSD. We tested clean installations of Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" and a daily snapshot (2010-02-16) of Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" on this netbook using the three file-systems: EXT3, EXT4, and Btrfs. Ubuntu 9.10 uses the Linux 2.6.31 kernel while Ubuntu 10.04 is using Linux 2.6.32.

Ubuntu Karmic and Lucid were tested with EXT3, EXT4, and Btrfs using the SQLite, Compile Bench, IOzone, Dbench, FS-Mark, Threaded I/O Tester, PostMark, and Unpack-Linux tests available through the Phoronix Test Suite. Each file-system was mounted with its default mount options and both releases of Ubuntu were left in their stock configurations.

With our infamous SQLite test, the EXT3 file-system in both instances was a few seconds faster, but to an end-user the performance between the EXT3 and EXT4 file-systems would be virtually identical for this test. The Btrfs file-system in this test on the netbook was much slower, as in it took many times longer to complete the benchmark. The good news, however, is that with Ubuntu 10.04 and the Linux 2.6.32 kernel the Btrfs performance has improved a great deal. The EXT3 / EXT4 performance had not improved much when switching to the development snapshot of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD R600g/RadeonSI Performance On Linux 3.16 With Mesa 10.3-devel
  2. Intel Pentium G3258 On Linux
  3. SilverStone Precision PS10
  4. ASRock Z97 Extreme6
Latest Linux Articles
  1. KVM Benchmarks On Ubuntu 14.10
  2. X.Org Server 1.16 Officially Released With Terrific Features
  3. Ubuntu With Linux 3.16 Smashes OS X 10.9.4 On The MacBook Air
  4. Preview: Benchmarking CentOS 7.0 & Scientific Linux 7.0
Latest Linux News
  1. Unigine Develops City Traffic System, A Driving Simulator
  2. Intel 3.0 X.Org Driver Still Baking, New Development Release
  3. Eric Anholt Makes Progress With Broadcom VC4 Graphics Driver
  4. Intel Is Getting Very Close To OpenGL 4.0/4.1/4.2 Mesa Support
  5. Valve Is Still Hiring For SteamOS, Linux Work
  6. Users Warned About Possible Regressions With DRI3
  7. GNOME Shell Gets Wayland HiDPI Fonts, Mutter Gets Touch Gestures
  8. BPTC Texture Compression Comes To Nouveau After Intel's Work
  9. Development Continues For Supporting EXT4 On NVDIMMs
  10. Libinput 0.5 Improves Pointer Acceleration, Adds A Configuration API
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  2. Radeon related kernel bug??
  3. AMD Publishes Open-Source Linux HSA Kernel Driver
  4. Next-Gen OpenGL To Be Announced Next Month
  5. Open-Source Radeon Performance Boosted By Linux 3.16
  6. Remote gui not accessible in Phoronix Test Suite 5.2
  7. AMD "Hawaii" Open-Source GPU Acceleration Still Not Working Right
  8. In Road To Qt, Audacious Switches From GTK3 Back To GTK2