1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The Tests Showing Ubuntu 11.04 On A Power Consumption Binge

Michael Larabel

Published on 23 April 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 3 of 7 - 19 Comments

Now it is onto the results for the ThinkPad T60 with the Intel Core Duo processor and discrete ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 (R500 generation) graphics. Again, first are the results from lightly using the desktop and then idling.

Like the ThinkPad R52 results, the T60 with its completely different Intel mobile processor, was much more power hungry in Ubuntu 11.04. The average, peak, and low power consumption points were all at a bad spot for Ubuntu Natty. Just how bad? Under this load, the T60 power consumption is up by 27% between Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04 Beta 2! That is going to lead to a significantly shorter battery life. In addition, for those that may be wondering, there were not any differences in backlight settings, dimming when idling, or other power management differences in these latest Ubuntu releases. There is though the Unity desktop, but there are results later in this article where classic GNOME is still used on Ubuntu 11.04.

When the Core Duo T2400 CPU was being fully stressed by the OpenSSL benchmark, the power consumption regression in Ubuntu 11.04 remains very much appalling. In fact, it is very scary. The power consumption with Ubuntu 11.04 on this Lenovo notebook is up by 19%. Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS had the best power consumption, but at the same time, its OpenSSL performance was the worst (see below). The average for Ubuntu 11.04 was 30.6 Watts under OpenSSL load while with Ubuntu 10.10 it was at just 25.8 Watts. The worst Ubuntu Linux release though in this case was Ubuntu 9.10 where it was at an average of 31.1 Watts, but Ubuntu 11.04 "won" for having the highest peak.

As can be seen from the OpenSSL results, Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS was slower than the rest of the pact, but for the rest of the releases the performance was all right in line with one another, so it's not that in some Ubuntu releases the Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST) is slowing down the system and keeping the CPU at a lower power state to save on power or anything along those lines.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. MSI X99S SLI PLUS On Linux
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
  3. CompuLab Intense-PC2: An Excellent, Fanless, Mini PC Powered By Intel's i7 Haswell
  4. From The Atom 330 To Haswell ULT: Intel Linux Performance Benchmarks
Latest Linux Articles
  1. RunAbove: A POWER8 Compute Cloud With Offerings Up To 176 Threads
  2. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Linux Desktop Benchmarks
  3. Ubuntu 14.10 XMir System Compositor Benchmarks
  4. Btrfs RAID HDD Testing On Ubuntu Linux 14.10
Latest Linux News
  1. Fedora 21 Beta & Final Release Slip Further
  2. Mesa 10.3.2 Has A Couple Bug-Fixes
  3. RadeonSI/R600g HyperZ Support Gets Turned Back On
  4. openSUSE Factory & Tumbleweed Are Merging
  5. More Fedora Delays: Fedora 21 Beta Slips
  6. Mono Brings C# To The Unreal Engine 4
  7. Coreboot Now Has Support For Intel Broadwell Hardware
  8. Enlightenment's EFL 1.12 Alpha Has Evas GL-DRM Engine, OpenGL ES 1.1 Support
  9. GTK+ Lands Experimental Backend For Mir Display Server
  10. Ubuntu 14.10 Officially Released
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. HOPE: The Ease Of Python With The Speed Of C++
  2. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  3. Ubuntu 16.04 Might Be The Distribution's Last 32-Bit Release
  4. Linux hacker compares Solaris kernel code:
  5. Advertisements On Phoronix
  6. Users/Developers Threatening Fork Of Debian GNU/Linux
  7. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  8. Proof that strlcpy is un-needed