1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The Tests Showing Ubuntu 11.04 On A Power Consumption Binge

Michael Larabel

Published on 23 April 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 3 of 7 - 19 Comments

Now it is onto the results for the ThinkPad T60 with the Intel Core Duo processor and discrete ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 (R500 generation) graphics. Again, first are the results from lightly using the desktop and then idling.

Like the ThinkPad R52 results, the T60 with its completely different Intel mobile processor, was much more power hungry in Ubuntu 11.04. The average, peak, and low power consumption points were all at a bad spot for Ubuntu Natty. Just how bad? Under this load, the T60 power consumption is up by 27% between Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04 Beta 2! That is going to lead to a significantly shorter battery life. In addition, for those that may be wondering, there were not any differences in backlight settings, dimming when idling, or other power management differences in these latest Ubuntu releases. There is though the Unity desktop, but there are results later in this article where classic GNOME is still used on Ubuntu 11.04.

When the Core Duo T2400 CPU was being fully stressed by the OpenSSL benchmark, the power consumption regression in Ubuntu 11.04 remains very much appalling. In fact, it is very scary. The power consumption with Ubuntu 11.04 on this Lenovo notebook is up by 19%. Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS had the best power consumption, but at the same time, its OpenSSL performance was the worst (see below). The average for Ubuntu 11.04 was 30.6 Watts under OpenSSL load while with Ubuntu 10.10 it was at just 25.8 Watts. The worst Ubuntu Linux release though in this case was Ubuntu 9.10 where it was at an average of 31.1 Watts, but Ubuntu 11.04 "won" for having the highest peak.

As can be seen from the OpenSSL results, Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS was slower than the rest of the pact, but for the rest of the releases the performance was all right in line with one another, so it's not that in some Ubuntu releases the Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST) is slowing down the system and keeping the CPU at a lower power state to save on power or anything along those lines.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Intel Broadwell: GCC 4.9 vs. LLVM Clang 3.5 Compiler Benchmarks
  2. Ubuntu vs. Fedora Linux On Lenovo's X1 Carbon With Core i7 Broadwell
  3. Ubuntu 15.04 Is The Easy Path To Better Performance On Intel Broadwell
  4. NVIDIA's Latest Maxwell Line-Up Against AMD With Catalyst On Linux
  5. Preliminary Tests Of Intel Sandy Bridge & Ivy Bridge vs. Broadwell
  6. AMD FX-8320E Performance On Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. I Switched (Back) Over To Fedora As My Main OS & It's Going Great!
  2. Windows 10, PS4, C4 & Systemd News Kicked Off 2015
  3. Calamares 1.0 Distribution-Independent Installer Framework Released
  4. Librem 15 Linux Laptop Set To Close At Around $400k USD
  5. Virtual GEM To Increase Mesa's Software Rasterizer Performance
  6. Open Lunchbox: Yet Another Open-Source Laptop Attempt
  7. Wayland/Weston 1.7 Release Candidate
  8. Bugzilla 5.0 Is Coming Soon With New Features
  9. Linux Benchmarking... Even Faster & A Very Interesting February
  10. Does VirtualBox VM Have Much A Future Left?
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. PlayStation 4 System Compiler Support Landing In LLVM
  2. Does VirtualBox VM Have Much A Future Left?
  3. Linux "GHOST" Vulnerability Hits Glibc Systems
  4. LibreOffice 4.4 Is Coming Soon With New Features
  5. LLVM Adds Options To Do Fuzz Testing
  6. Broadwell Linux Ultrabook Running MUCH Cooler Than Haswell
  7. LibreOffice 4.4 Released With Better OOXML Support, UI Improvements
  8. Inkscape 0.91 Goes Through C++ Code Conversion, New Cairo Rendering, OpenMP Filters