Ubuntu 11.04 Boot Performance Compared To Past Releases

Published on April 27, 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6
Discuss This Article

Now that we have looked at the Ubuntu power consumption going back as far as Ubuntu 8.04 LTS (and found serious power regressions), the next round of testing is providing the Bootchart results for five different systems also going back as far as Ubuntu 8.04 LTS.

Following a clean install of each operating system and leaving the system in its clean state with stock settings (and packages) aside from installing Bootchart, the Bootchart result was gathered after two reboots. For all releases it was the time measured to the automatic log-in. Again, the key mobile test systems included:

ThinkPad R52: Intel Pentium M 1.86GHz single-core, IBM 18494WU motherboard SKU with Intel Mobile i915 + ICH6M chipset, 2GB of system memory, 80GB Hitachi HTS541080G9AT00 IDE HDD, ATI Mobility Radeon X300 graphics

ThinkPad T60: Intel Core Duo T2400 dual-core, Lenovo 2613EJU motherboard SKU with Intel 945 + ICH7M chipset, 1GB of system memory, 80GB Hitachi HTS541080G9SA00, and ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 128MB graphics.

ThinkPad T61: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 dual-core (x86_64), Lenovo 6459CTO SKU, Intel PM965 + ICH8M-E chipset, 4GB of system memory, 100GB Hitachi SATA HDD HTS72201, and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M graphics.

Samsung NC10: Intel Atom N270, Intel 945GME + ICH7-M, 2GB of system memory, 32GB OCZ Core SSD, and Intel i945 graphics.

ASUS Eee PC 1201N: Intel Atom 330 dual-core + Hyper Threading, ASUS 1201N motherboard with MCP79 chipset, 2GB of system memory, 250GB HTS54502 SATA HDD, and NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics.

The key Ubuntu information to recap is Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS with the Linux 2.6.24 kernel, 8.10 Intrepid with Linux 2.6.27, 9.04 Jaunty with Linux 2.6.29, 9.10 Karmic with Linux 2.6.31, 10.04.2 LTS Lucid with Linux 2.6.32, 10.10 Maverick with Linux 2.6.35, and 11.04 Beta 2 with the Linux 2.6.38 kernel. The 64-bit Ubuntu release was tested on the Lenovo ThinkPad T61 and ASUS Eee PC 1201N where x86_64 is supported but for the other notebooks they were limited to 32-bit testing. The other important item to note with the boot testing is between Ubuntu 9.04 and Ubuntu 9.10 is when the switch to the EXT4 file-system took place from EXT3.

The results for each system are reported on the following pages. The Bootchart graphs are also available for those who wish to further analyze the boot process for each release.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  2. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  3. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  4. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
Latest Linux News
  1. Wayland's Weston Gets Output Scaling Support
  2. Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer
  3. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  4. Intel Ultrabook Performance Is Faster With Mesa 9.2
  5. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
  6. Phoronix Test Suite 4.6.0 "Utsira" Released
  7. New Intel X.Org Driver Supports All Of Haswell
  8. SQLite Now Faster With Memory Mapped I/O
  9. Microsoft Releases Skype For Linux 4.2, Has Bug-Fixes
  10. Qt For Tizen Launches, Based On Qt 5.1
  11. KTAP Released For Linux Kernel Dynamic Tracing
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  2. Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer
  3. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No...
  4. Humble Indie Bundle Finally Sells Out
  5. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
  6. Kubuntu, KDE Has Little Hope For Ubuntu's Mir
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite