1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Running An Encrypted LVM In Ubuntu 10.10

Michael Larabel

Published on 25 September 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 2 - 11 Comments

Back with Ubuntu 7.10 an option was added to Ubuntu's alternate CD installer to easily setup an encrypted LVM during the Ubuntu installation process. This would better protect your personal data in the case your laptop or mobile device was ever stolen or misplaced as the Ubuntu Linux installation cannot boot if the encrypted LVM cannot be mounted with the encryption pass-phrase. Of course, encrypting the entire root partition can cause a performance penalty as some of our earlier results have shown while introduced in Ubuntu 9.04 was support for home encryption where only your SWAP and home folder is encrypted and this is done using eCryptfs. This continues to be Canonical's preferred method of encrypting user data with it being available from the standard Ubuntu installer while even three years later only the install-time encrypted LVM support can be accessed from their alternate installer. For those serious about encrypting their disk drive on Linux, we have new benchmarks from Ubuntu 10.10 showing how an encrypted LVM will affect your file-system performance.

To satisfy some reader requests we simply ran a few disk benchmarks when an Ubuntu 10.10 development snapshot was installed on an un-encrypted LVM and then again, when the root file-system was under an encrypted LVM setup by the Ubuntu Maverick alternate CD installer. Ubuntu 10.10 was used with the Linux 2.6.35 kernel, X.Org Server 1.9.0, GCC 4.4.3, and an EXT4 file-system. The test system was a Lenovo ThinkPad W510 with an Intel Core i7 720QM CPU clocked at 1.60GHz with a total of eight cores (physical quad core + Hyper Threading), 4GB of system memory, a NVIDIA Quadro FX880M graphics processor, and the disk used was a 160GB Intel X25-M SATA 2.0 SSD (SSDSA2M160).

When firing up the Phoronix Test Suite with the Apache test profile, using an encrypted LVM of the entire disk resulted in a 6% performance drop compared to using an LVM without LUKS encryption.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Scythe Mugen MAX
  2. Intel Core i7 5960X Haswell-E On Linux
  3. Intel 80GB 530 Series M.2 SSD On Linux
  4. With A New Motherboard, The Core i7 5960X Haswell-E Lights Up
Latest Linux Articles
  1. RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst At 4K UHD On Linux
  2. MSAA RadeonSI Gallium3D Performance Preview
  3. Intel Core i7 5960X CPU Core Scaling Under Linux
  4. AMD RadeonSI Gallium3D Performance For 4K Linux Gaming
Latest Linux News
  1. Valve Begins Publicly Tracking AMD Catalyst Linux Issues
  2. Digia Qt Spinoff Is Called "The Qt Company"
  3. GNOME 3.14 Makes More Progress In Running Natively On Wayland
  4. Minix 3.3 Released With Cortex-A8 ARM Support, NetBSD Userland Compatibility
  5. More Intel DRM Changes Queued For Linux 3.18, Including Old i830M Fixes
  6. New Code Starts Lining Up For X.Org Server 1.17
  7. Rust Developers Planning For The Rust 1.0 Language
  8. RPM 4.12 Brings New Switches, New Rpm2Archive Utility
  9. Nouveau For Linux 3.18 Gains DP Audio, More Re-Clocking
  10. SUSE Gets Bought Out Again
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd
  2. support for first generation UVD blocks (RV6xx, RS780, RS880 and RV790)
  3. Nvidia joins the ranks of Apple and Microsoft
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. Hd 6850
  6. nv and xorg.conf under Debian PPC
  7. X.Org Is Looking For Some Female Help
  8. FSF Issues Their Rebuttal To Apple's New iPhone, Watch & Apple Pay