1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Ubuntu 9.10 Netbook Performance

Michael Larabel

Published on 23 October 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 7 - 9 Comments

There is just one week left until Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" will be released, but is it worth the upgrade if you are running a netbook? From our testing of the development releases, it is most certainly worth the upgrade, especially when compared to Ubuntu 9.04 with its buggy Intel driver stack that caused many problems for Atom netbook users. Ubuntu 9.10 brings many usability improvements to the Linux desktop, various new packages, and the overall system performance has improved too. We have ran a set of benchmarks on both a Dell Inspiron Mini 9 and Samsung NC10 under Ubuntu 9.04 and 9.10 to illustrate the performance gains along with a few regressions.

The Intel Atom N270 CPU with an Intel Mobile 945GME Chipset with integrated Intel graphics powers both the Dell Mini 9 and Samsung NC10. The Inspiron Mini 9 though was loaded up with 1GB of RAM and an 8GB STEC PATA SSD while the NC10 ran with 2GB of RAM and a 32GB OCZ Core Series SSD. Clean installations of Ubuntu 9.04 "Jaunty Jackalope" and Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" were done to both of these netbooks, which were then left to run with their stock settings, including the use of Compiz.

To recap, Ubuntu 9.04 shipped with the Linux 2.6.28 kernel, GNOME 2.26.1, X Server 1.6.0, xf86-video-intel 2.6.3, Mesa 7.4, GCC 4.3.3, and uses an EXT3 file-system by default. Ubuntu 9.10 is going to be shipping with the Linux 2.6.31 kernel, GNOME 2.28.0, X Server 1.6.4, xf86-video-intel 2.9.0, Mesa 7.6, GCC 4.4.1, and defaults to an EXT4 file-system.

The tests we ran to compare Ubuntu 9.04 and Ubuntu 9.10 on the Dell and Samsung netbooks were OpenArena, LAME MP3 encoding, 7-Zip compression, LZMA compression, IOzone, PostMark, SQLite, PostgreSQL, Crafty, GtkPerf, and QGears2. All of this testing was done through the Phoronix Test Suite, of course.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Gigabyte AM1M-S2H
  2. AMD's New Athlon/Semprons Give Old Phenom CPUs A Big Run For The Money
  3. 13-Way Low-End GPU Comparison With AMD's AM1 Athlon
  4. ASUS AM1I-A: A Mini-ITX Board For Socketed Kabini APUs
Latest Linux Articles
  1. How Much Video RAM Is Needed For Catalyst R3 Graphics?
  2. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS vs. 14.04 LTS Cloud Benchmarks
  3. Ubuntu 12.04.4 vs. 13.10 vs. 14.04 LTS Desktop Benchmarks
  4. AMD OpenCL Performance With AM1 Kabini APUs
Latest Linux News
  1. EmScripten Merges Its Speedy "Fastcomp" Backend
  2. Nuclear Dawn Update Has Full Linux Support
  3. Oracle Linux 6.5 vs. Oracle Linux 7.0 Beta Benchmarks
  4. Easter Yields The Linux 3.15-rc2 Kernel Release
  5. The Most Amazing OpenGL Tech Demo In 64kb
  6. Packard Bell LM85 Now Supported By Coreboot
  7. AmazonBasics External USB 2.0 DVD Writer For Linux
  8. TP-LINK TG-3468: A $12 Linux PCI-E Gigabit Network Adapter
  9. Linux 3.15 Lands Some DRM Graphics Driver Fixes
  10. AMD Is Disabling DPM Support For RV770 GPUs
  11. ReactOS Working On A Community Windows OS
  12. eRacks Keeps Pushing Linux, Open-Source Systems After 15 Years
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. ReactOS Working On A Community Windows OS
  2. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  3. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  4. Catalyst 14.3 Beta
  5. Suggestions about how to make a Radeon HD 7790 work decently?
  6. Radeon 8000M problematic on Linux?
  7. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  8. After Jack Keane, RuseSoft will briing Ankh 3 to Linux through Desura