1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

Is Arch Linux Really Faster Than Ubuntu?

Michael Larabel

Published on 19 May 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 6 of 6 - 145 Comments

There was little fluctuation with dcraw between the Arch rolling-release distribution, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, and the early Ubuntu 10.10 development packages.

There's nothing interesting with the Parallel BZIP2 compression results.

The MAFFT results were also the same.

While we often hear "Arch is faster than Ubuntu" and similar statements in our forums and via email comments, this really is not the case. At least when both Arch and Ubuntu are put in as much a stock configuration as possible to reflect the "out of the box" experience encountered by most users, the numbers shown on this Intel Core 2 Duo notebook show the performance to be about the same. The only time there were major swings in performance is when one distribution is using a compositing manager during the OpenGL testing and in some of the disk tests with the EXT4 file-system where its performance is known to sway a great deal between Linux kernel releases due to various changes talked about in other Phoronix articles. Of course, if you think differently or are using very different hardware, you can see for yourself in a reproducible way using the Phoronix Test Suite.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux News
  1. HiSense Chromebook Benchmarks When Running Ubuntu Linux
  2. Mandriva Linux Was Allegedly Brought Down By Employee Lawsuits
  3. GNOME 3.17.2 Is Released As The Latest Look Towards GNOME 3.18
  4. Phoronix Turns 11 Years Old Next Week: How Should We Celebrate?
  5. Ubuntu Community Council Reaffirms Its Decision Against Kubuntu's Leader
  6. Future Plans For Changing Fedora's Installer
  7. Confusion Mounts Over Wayland's Actual License
  8. GNOME's Mutter Now Supports Drag-n-Drop To/From Wayland & X11
  9. Wine 1.7.44 Works On More 64-bit ARM Support
  10. Phoronix Test Suite 5.8 Milestone 5 Brings Near Final "Belev" Experience
Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Btrfs RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Five-Disk Benchmarks On Linux 4.1
  2. Opening The Gates To Our Daily Open-Source Linux Benchmark Results
  3. The Latest Features For Linux Performance Management + Benchmark Monitoring
  4. Noctua NH-U12DX i4 + NF-F12
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. NVIDIA's Proprietary Driver Is Moving Closer With Kernel Mode-Setting
  2. Features Added To Mesa 10.6 For Open-Source GPU Drivers
  3. Ubuntu's LXD vs. KVM For The Linux Cloud
  4. Friction Building Around An Ubuntu Community Council Decision
  5. The Latest Linux Kernel Git Code Fixes The EXT4 RAID0 Corruption Problem
  6. The CompuLab Fitlet Is A Neat Little Linux PC With AMD SoC
  7. Linux 4.1-rc5 Kernel Released
  8. Russia's Baikal Chips End Up Going For A MIPS CPU