Checking In On Ubuntu Karmic's Boot Time

Published on August 27, 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 3 of 3
Discuss This Article

Turning to a notebook boot test, we used the Lenovo ThinkPad T60 with an Intel Core Duo T2400 with 2GB of RAM, an 80GB 5400RPM hard drive, and ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 graphics.

Ubuntu 8.10 on the ThinkPad T60 booted in 31 seconds with a maximum disk throughput of just 16MB/s. With Ubuntu 9.04 there was a modest improvement to take the boot time to 21 seconds and more than doubling the disk throughput to 36MB/s. With Ubuntu 9.10, the T60 is looking at a boot time of still 21 seconds but the disk throughput dropped to 29MB/s.

Well, from this very simple testing, Ubuntu 9.10 is not looking like it will be booting significantly faster than Ubuntu 9.04, unless there are some last minute changes. Even by adopting EXT4 as the default file-system, using the newer Linux 2.6.31 kernel, and making other changes, there were no real boot-time improvements found in this Ubuntu 9.10 daily snapshot. The boot times right now though for the Intel Atom netbooks with solid state drives is not bad currently, but of course it can be made faster per Canonical's goals and even by looking at Moblin V2 right now with its incredibly fast boot times. Back in June, Canonical's Scott James Remnant laid out some of Ubuntu's boot plans for speeding up the process by Ubuntu 10.04 LTS by starting up the X Server faster, optimizing the initramfs, and taking other steps.

We will run these tests again on more systems once Ubuntu 9.10 is golden and as Ubuntu 10.04 LTS approaches.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.

3
Next Page >>
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  2. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  3. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
  4. AMD Radeon Gallium3D More Competitive With Catalyst On Linux
Latest Software Articles
  1. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  2. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  3. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
  4. Previewing The Radeon Gallium3D Shader Optimizations
Latest Linux News
  1. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed With
  2. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
  3. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
  4. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks For Intel Ivy Bridge
  5. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No Longer Fit
  6. Firefox 22 Beta Enables WebRTC Support
  7. OpenSUSE 13.1 Milestone 1 Released
  8. DRM Graphics Driver Comes For Dove/Cubox
  9. JADE: An LLVM-Based Video Decoder For MPEG RVC
  10. Ubuntu 13.10 Likely Switching To Chromium Browser
  11. Unity 7, Compiz To Be Polished For Ubuntu 13.10
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  2. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed...
  3. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No...
  4. Ubuntu 13.10 Likely Switching To Chromium Browser
  5. KDE's Krita Ported To OpenGL 3.1, OpenGL ES 2.0
  6. Ubuntu Looks Towards MySQL Alternatives
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite