1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Ubuntu 9.10 Off To A Great Performance Start

Michael Larabel

Published on 15 May 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 6 of 6 - 142 Comments

The 4GB read performance was also in favor of Ubuntu 9.10: 70MB/s versus 54MB/s.

With another disk test, Flexible IO Tester, Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha 1 continued to present a strong lead over the Jaunty Jackalope. It took 95 seconds for Ubuntu 9.04 to complete the Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern test where as Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha 1 took just 76 seconds.

Our final benchmark for this early Ubuntu 9.10 testing was with the timed MAFFT alignment where Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha 1 was faster by about one second.

Wow, while there may not be many end-user improvements in Ubuntu 9.10 yet and the desktop looks just like that of Ubuntu 9.04, there does seem to be some performance improvements. Besides the huge SQLite improvement that did not come as a surprise, there are better compilation times with GCC 4.4, much better disk performance with the newer Linux kernel, and other improvements throughout. One area that still needs to be improved upon is with the Intel Linux graphics performance after going through radical changes with kernel mode-setting, DRI2, and the Graphics Execution Manager.

This is still way too early to say how Ubuntu 9.10 final will perform, but we will be back through the development cycle of the Karmic Koala with plenty more benchmarks. We will also be covering other features as they emerge like the integration of Plymouth and the default enabling of kernel mode-setting on Intel graphics hardware. To run your own tests, check out the Phoronix Test Suite.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. MSI X99S SLI PLUS On Linux
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
  3. CompuLab Intense-PC2: An Excellent, Fanless, Mini PC Powered By Intel's i7 Haswell
  4. From The Atom 330 To Haswell ULT: Intel Linux Performance Benchmarks
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Open-Source Radeon 2D Performance Is Better With Ubuntu 14.10
  2. RunAbove: A POWER8 Compute Cloud With Offerings Up To 176 Threads
  3. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Linux Desktop Benchmarks
  4. Ubuntu 14.10 XMir System Compositor Benchmarks
Latest Linux News
  1. Ubuntu 14.04 In The Power8 Cloud From RunAbove
  2. KDE With Theoretical Client-Side Decorations, Windows 10 Influence
  3. Sandusky Lee: Great Cabinets For Storing All Your Computer Gear
  4. Fedora 21 Beta & Final Release Slip Further
  5. Mesa 10.3.2 Has A Couple Bug-Fixes
  6. RadeonSI/R600g HyperZ Support Gets Turned Back On
  7. openSUSE Factory & Tumbleweed Are Merging
  8. More Fedora Delays: Fedora 21 Beta Slips
  9. Mono Brings C# To The Unreal Engine 4
  10. Coreboot Now Has Support For Intel Broadwell Hardware
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Use Ubuntu MATE 14.10 Make it an official distro.
  2. HOPE: The Ease Of Python With The Speed Of C++
  3. Users/Developers Threatening Fork Of Debian GNU/Linux
  4. Debian Is Back To Discussing Init Systems, Freedom of Choice
  5. AMD Radeon VDPAU Video Performance With Gallium3D
  6. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  7. Ubuntu 16.04 Might Be The Distribution's Last 32-Bit Release
  8. Linux hacker compares Solaris kernel code: