1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Ubuntu 12.04 LTS KVM Virtualization Battles 8.04.4, 10.04.4 LTS

Michael Larabel

Published on 9 April 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 7 - Comment On This Article

While recent testing has shown how Ubuntu 12.04 LTS KVM/Xen/VirtualBox virtualization compares between Intel's Sandy Bridge and AMD's Bulldozer platforms, in this article is a different look at the KVM virtualization performance of the forthcoming Ubuntu 12.04 LTS operating system. In this review is a look at the KVM virtualization performance of Ubuntu 12.04 LTS compared to the earlier Ubuntu 10.04.4 and Ubuntu 8.04.4 Long-Term Support releases.


This latest round of Linux virtualization benchmarks is going back to the four-year-old Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS "Hardy Heron" operating system.

This article is meant to provide some reference figures how Ubuntu's KVM virtualization performance has matured over the past four years when it comes to using the Ubuntu LTS releases -- the versions most commonly adopted for enterprise use. From a quad-core AMD Opteron setup, with the Ubuntu Hardy Heron (8.04.4), Lucid Lynx (10.04.4), and Precise Pangolin (12.04; latest daily image at the time of testing) the performance was compared when running bare metal (on the host without any form of virtualization), when running KVM virtualization with a KVM Ubuntu 8.04.4 guest, and when running KVM virtualization with a matching guest (i.e. Ubuntu 10.04 running with an Ubuntu 10.04 KVM guest, Ubuntu 12.04 running with an Ubuntu 12.04 KVM guest, etc.)

This provides a look at how Ubuntu's performance has changed in general outside of virtualization and then the benefits (or regressions) from just upgrading the host but not the virtualized guest machine or what happens if upgrading both for every LTS cycle.

Each OS was left in its stock configuration. The stock virt-manager settings were used when performing the VM installation on each release. As well, the hardware was maintained the same throughout testing; a quad-core AMD Opteron 2384, 4GB of RAM, and a 64GB OCZ Agility EX SATA SSD. All of this bare metal and virtualization Linux benchmarking was done via the Phoronix Test Suite and analyzed on OpenBenchmarking.org.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 & E5-2687W v3 Compared To The Core i7 5960X On Linux
  2. Intel 120GB 530 Series SSD Linux Performance
  3. Btrfs/EXT4/XFS/F2FS RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Linux Benchmarks On Four SSDs
  4. AMD's Windows Catalyst Driver Remains Largely Faster Than Linux Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers With Linux 3.18 + Mesa 10.4-devel
  2. Is The Open-Source NVIDIA Driver Fast Enough For Steam On Linux Gaming?
  3. Linux 3.18 File-System Performance Minimally Changed But Possible Regressions
  4. AMD Radeon Gallium3D Is Catching Up & Sometimes Beating Catalyst On Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. Linux 3.18 Kernel: Not Much Change With Intel Haswell Performance
  2. More File-System Tests Of The Linux 3.18 Kernel
  3. Using NVIDIA's NVENC On Linux With FFmpeg
  4. There's Talk Again About An "Open To The Core" Ubuntu Laptop
  5. PowerVR SGX Driver Code Gets Leaked
  6. V2 Of KDBUS Published For Linux Kernel Review
  7. VirtualBox 4.3.20 Arrives, Still No Sign Of VirtualBox 4.4
  8. Scientific Linux 6.6 vs. Scientific Linux 7.0 Benchmarks
  9. Qualcomm Looks To Get Into The ARM Server Business
  10. HHVM 3.4 Adds New Features, Support
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Roadmap to Catalyst 14.10 ?
  2. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  3. Cant get working Kaveri APU - A10-7850k
  4. Debian Developer Resigns From The Systemd Maintainership Team
  5. Script for Fan Speed Control
  6. Debian Init System Coupling Vote Results
  7. The Slides Announcing The New "AMDGPU" Kernel Driver
  8. Ubuntu Developers Still Thinking What To Do About Adobe Flash Support