The initial create process for Compile Bench was the fastest with EXT3/EXT4 followed by XFS. ReiserFS was even faster than Btrfs in this test. EXT4 was about 23% faster than Btrfs.
For the Flexible IO Tester, Btrfs was by far the slowest file-system while EXT4 came in as the fastest. While not as bad as Btrfs, the XFS file-system was also noticeably slower than the rest of the friendly Linux file-system competition.
Overall, the EXT4 file-system performed very well in this latest round of Linux file-system benchmarks. Again, this was testing each file-system as the root file-system upon performing clean installations of Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with its default Linux 3.2-based kernel. These results are also just focused upon a single-disk SSD-based Intel Sandy Bridge system, as common to Linux desktop enthusiasts, where as some of these file-systems and tests are better suited towards multi-disk workstations or traditional hard drives. For what it's worth though, EXT4 was ahead in the majority of the tests. This article also ignores the features of the different file-systems, where as Btrfs is more advanced than EXT4 with its various transparent compression options, copy-on-write snapshots, etc. Stay tuned for more benchmark results, including when testing each of the Btrfs mount options on Ubuntu 12.04.
Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.