1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.2 vs. Oracle, CentOS, Scientific Linux Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 23 February 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 5 - 8 Comments

Does Red Hat Enterprise Linux perform any better (or worse) than the various "Enterprise Linux" distributions that are derived from RHEL? Now that Scientific Linux 6.2 was released, here is a performance comparison of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Oracle Linux, CentOS, and Scientific Linux across three different systems.

Using the x86_64 6.2 releases of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Oracle Linux, CentOS, and Scientific Linux a set of benchmarks were ran across all four enterprise-class Linux distributions on three distinct systems. While all four distributions are derived from the same upstream base (RHEL 6.2), this testing is seeking out a common question of whether Red Hat Enterprise Linux or others have any significant performance benefit. Of course, all of the testing is being done in the stock configuration on each platform with the stock packages, which are all effectively the same.

Of these three RHEL offspring, Oracle Linux is the one attempting to differentiate itself the most from Red Hat for commercial gain with their plans to use Btrfs, bringing DTrace to Linux, their acquisition of KSplice, etc. As you will see on the next page, there is also other areas where the Oracle Linux kernel differs from RHEL.

The Enterprise Linux 6.2 distributions are using a heavily-patched Linux 2.6.32 kernel, GNOME 2.28.2 desktop, X.Org Server 1.10.4, GCC 4.4.6, an EXT4 file-system, xf86-video-intel 2.16.0, xf86-video-nouveau 0.0.16, xf86-video-radeon 6.14.2, and Mesa 7.11.

The three systems used were based around an Intel Core i7 3960X Sandy Bridge Extreme Edition, dual AMD Opteron 2384 quad-core Shanghai, and Intel Core i5 2520M CPUs. The Core i7 3960X system with its 12 threads had 16GB of RAM and a 240GB OCZ Vertex 3 SATA 3.0 SSD. The aging dual AMD Opteron 2384 with its eight total cores had 4GB of RAM and a Western Digital SATA HDD. For as a last obscure test system to differentiate from the two other systems being tested was an HP EliteBook with its Core i5 2520M Sandy Bridge CPU, 4GB of RAM, and a 160GB Intel SSD. Other system details are available from the OpenBenchmarking.org-powered table.

This is a straightforward comparison so let us jump to the results...

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Scythe Mugen MAX
  2. Intel Core i7 5960X Haswell-E On Linux
  3. Intel 80GB 530 Series M.2 SSD On Linux
  4. With A New Motherboard, The Core i7 5960X Haswell-E Lights Up
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Intel P-State vs. CPUFreq Benchmarks On The i7-5960X
  2. RadeonSI GLAMOR Benchmarks With X.Org Server 1.16
  3. RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst At 4K UHD On Linux
  4. MSAA RadeonSI Gallium3D Performance Preview
Latest Linux News
  1. X.Org Server Shatter Project Fails
  2. X.Org Women Outreach Program Only Turns Up Two Applicants So Far
  3. Fedora 21 Alpha Finally Coming Next Week
  4. Ubuntu Touch/Phone Reaches Its First RTM Image
  5. The KMS Mode-Setting Driver Was Imported For X.Org Server 1.17
  6. SNA & UXA Intel Benchmarks With X.Org Server 1.16
  7. Graphics Driver Changes Coming In The Linux 3.18 Kernel
  8. Tropico 5 Being Released For Linux Gamers This Week
  9. Eclipse IDE Starts Firing Up On Wayland's Weston
  10. OpenSUSE Announcement On SUSE's Recent Merger
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Can Linux kill a motherboard?
  2. Stop grabbing my keyboard :(
  3. New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. Best Radeon for a Power Mac G5?
  6. New stress testing utility for GPU's
  7. Hd 6850
  8. support for first generation UVD blocks (RV6xx, RS780, RS880 and RV790)