1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

2009 Linux Graphics Survey Results

Michael Larabel

Published on 7 December 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 3 of 5 - 15 Comments

The fifth question in our annual survey asked what version of X.Org was being used on their system(s). The most popular choice was X.Org 7.4. This is to no surprise at all considering it has been around for more than a year and X.Org 7.5 was not even released until October. There are very few distributions running with X.Org 7.5 aside from Fedora, while most of the distributions over the past year have been running with X.Org 7.4 and X Server 1.5 or X Server 1.6. X.Org 7.5 was the second most popular choice followed by X.Org 7.3. As percentages, X.Org 7.4 had controlled just over half of the systems at 54.5%, X.Org 7.5 at 31%, and X.Org 7.3 at 7.4%. Only 1.1% of those participating in this Phoronix survey were running a Git master snapshot of X.Org.

After asking about the X.Org versions, we next asked what display features (if any) they were using whether it be TV-Out, multiple display heads, output hot-plugging, or GPU power saving modes. Among the four choices, multiple display heads was most popular followed by GPU power saving modes, then output hot-plugging, and then finally in last was TV-Out.

The seventh question focused on finding out how their display / X configuration was being handled. A majority of the users were using a graphical utility like nvidia-settings, system-config-display, or AMD Catalyst Control Linux Edition. However, in a very close second was still modifying the xorg.conf file manually. It's rather sad to see that in 2009/2010 that so many users continue to modify their configuration files by hand that there aren't graphical or CLI utilities available (or that they are aware of) that can suit their configuration needs. If Linux is to become a mainstream operating system with consumers, they must not need to be introduced to editing the xorg.conf themselves. Last year though modifying the xorg.conf file manually was the most popular choice, so at least it is losing ground these days. In third for this question was using the xrandr CLI utility followed by using a vendor-specific CLI utility like nvidia-xconfig and aticonfig.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Radeon Linux Benchmarks: Catalyst 15.3 Beta vs. Linux 4.0 + Mesa 10.6-devel
  2. Trying Out The Modern Linux Desktops With 4 Monitors + AMD/NVIDIA Graphics
  3. Turning A Basement Into A Big Linux Server Room
  4. NVIDIA's $1000+ GeForce GTX TITAN X Delivers Maximum Linux Performance
  5. OS X 10.10 vs. Ubuntu 15.04 vs. Fedora 21 Tests: Linux Sweeps The Board
  6. The New Place Where Linux Code Is Constantly Being Benchmarked
Latest Linux News
  1. Debian 8.0 Jessie Gets A Release Date
  2. Firefox 37 Coming Today With Heartbeat, HTTPS Bing
  3. OpenIndiana 2015.03 Updates Its Solaris/Illumos Environment
  4. GNOME 3.16 SDK Runtime Now Available
  5. Initial Intel Braxton Support Might Come To Linux 4.1
  6. Why KDE's KWin Doesn't Integrate Weston/QtCompositor For Wayland Support
  7. Clang Now Supports Targeting The NaCl OS
  8. PC-BSD Updates Its Lumina Desktop (v0.8.3)
  9. Fedora 22 Alpha Now Available For AArch64 & PowerPC64
  10. Systemd Developers Did NOT Fork The Linux Kernel
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Introducing The Library Operating System For Linux
  2. Improved OpenCL Support For Blender's Cycles Renderer
  3. The Big Features Of The Linux 4.0 Kernel
  4. Open-Source Driver Fans Will Love NVIDIA's New OpenGL Demo
  5. Allwinner Continues Jerking Around The Open-Source Community
  6. GNOME 3.16 Released: It's Their Best Release Yet
  7. Ubuntu 15.04 Final Beta Released
  8. Systemd Change Allows For Stateless Systems With Tmpfs