1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

12-Core ARM Cluster Benchmarked Against Intel Atom, Ivy Bridge, AMD Fusion

Michael Larabel

Published on 14 June 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 2 of 16 - 20 Comments

The purpose of Effimaß basically just comes down to having a low-power ARM cluster for some interesting benchmark results, using it as a platform for porting new benchmarks to ARM, bringing new MPI cluster capabilities to the Phoronix Test Suite framework, and making other related improvements for ARM and cluster computing within the open-source Phoronix benchmarking stack.

Before getting any further, thanks go out to Texas Instruments and SVTronics for supporting this cluster by providing the PandaBoard ES development boards at a discount to make it even more affordable. The PandaBoard ES currently retails for about $182 USD, so when everything is said and done, the cluster carries a retail price of around $1,200 USD.

In the Phoronix office tour it was shown where Effimaß was going to be setup, but due short CAT5 cables interfering, for now the cluster is running on a standalone cart and is attached to a 48-port enterprise-grade network switch. The network switch power consumption wasn't monitored as part of the power monitoring since eventually the cluster will move back to its intended location where it will be tapping an already present 24-port enterprise-grade network switch and thus not lead to any net increase in power draw.

As far as the Effimaß name for this 12-core ARM cluster, from the Bavarian who named it, her reasoning came down to: "1. Effizienz for efficiency, in terms of the low-power ARM cores. 2. Maß: basically the measure of all things." So how efficient is the cluster at the moment? While tweaking has only just begun and more tests are still being conducted, the six PandaBoard ES cluster is idling at 15~16 Watts, under load is averaging about 29 Watts, and the peak power consumption I have seen under load is 31 Watts. This is while delivering some rather surprising numbers. I was expecting the 10/100 Ethernet and/or the SDHC-backed storage to be the main bottleneck for the Ubuntu Linux cluster, but that did not actually seem to be the case, at least with the MPI workloads tested thus far.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Scythe Mugen MAX
  2. Intel Core i7 5960X Haswell-E On Linux
  3. Intel 80GB 530 Series M.2 SSD On Linux
  4. With A New Motherboard, The Core i7 5960X Haswell-E Lights Up
Latest Linux Articles
  1. MSAA RadeonSI Gallium3D Performance Preview
  2. Intel Core i7 5960X CPU Core Scaling Under Linux
  3. AMD RadeonSI Gallium3D Performance For 4K Linux Gaming
  4. 9-Way File-System Comparison With A SSD On The Linux 3.17 Kernel
Latest Linux News
  1. Rust Developers Planning For The Rust 1.0 Language
  2. RPM 4.12 Brings New Switches, New Rpm2Archive Utility
  3. Qt 5.3.2 & Qt Creator 3.2.1 Released
  4. Nouveau For Linux 3.18 Gains DP Audio, More Re-Clocking
  5. SUSE Gets Bought Out Again
  6. Enlightenment E19 Officially Released With Its Own Wayland Compositor
  7. OpenMediaVault 1.0 Released As New Linux NAS Alternative
  8. VESA Releases DisplayPort 1.3, Pushes 32.4 Gbits/sec
  9. Opera 25 Beta Has Bookmarks & Linux Support
  10. LLVM Clang Now Builds Even More Debian Packages
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. support for first generation UVD blocks (RV6xx, RS780, RS880 and RV790)
  2. Nvidia joins the ranks of Apple and Microsoft
  3. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  4. New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd
  5. Hd 6850
  6. nv and xorg.conf under Debian PPC
  7. X.Org Is Looking For Some Female Help
  8. FSF Issues Their Rebuttal To Apple's New iPhone, Watch & Apple Pay