1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

12-Core ARM Cluster Benchmarked Against Intel Atom, Ivy Bridge, AMD Fusion

Michael Larabel

Published on 14 June 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 2 of 16 - 20 Comments

The purpose of Effimaß basically just comes down to having a low-power ARM cluster for some interesting benchmark results, using it as a platform for porting new benchmarks to ARM, bringing new MPI cluster capabilities to the Phoronix Test Suite framework, and making other related improvements for ARM and cluster computing within the open-source Phoronix benchmarking stack.

Before getting any further, thanks go out to Texas Instruments and SVTronics for supporting this cluster by providing the PandaBoard ES development boards at a discount to make it even more affordable. The PandaBoard ES currently retails for about $182 USD, so when everything is said and done, the cluster carries a retail price of around $1,200 USD.

In the Phoronix office tour it was shown where Effimaß was going to be setup, but due short CAT5 cables interfering, for now the cluster is running on a standalone cart and is attached to a 48-port enterprise-grade network switch. The network switch power consumption wasn't monitored as part of the power monitoring since eventually the cluster will move back to its intended location where it will be tapping an already present 24-port enterprise-grade network switch and thus not lead to any net increase in power draw.

As far as the Effimaß name for this 12-core ARM cluster, from the Bavarian who named it, her reasoning came down to: "1. Effizienz for efficiency, in terms of the low-power ARM cores. 2. Maß: basically the measure of all things." So how efficient is the cluster at the moment? While tweaking has only just begun and more tests are still being conducted, the six PandaBoard ES cluster is idling at 15~16 Watts, under load is averaging about 29 Watts, and the peak power consumption I have seen under load is 31 Watts. This is while delivering some rather surprising numbers. I was expecting the 10/100 Ethernet and/or the SDHC-backed storage to be the main bottleneck for the Ubuntu Linux cluster, but that did not actually seem to be the case, at least with the MPI workloads tested thus far.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD R600g/RadeonSI Performance On Linux 3.16 With Mesa 10.3-devel
  2. Intel Pentium G3258 On Linux
  3. SilverStone Precision PS10
  4. ASRock Z97 Extreme6
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Nouveau vs. Radeon vs. Intel Tests On Linux 3.16, Mesa 10.3-devel
  2. KVM Benchmarks On Ubuntu 14.10
  3. X.Org Server 1.16 Officially Released With Terrific Features
  4. Ubuntu With Linux 3.16 Smashes OS X 10.9.4 On The MacBook Air
Latest Linux News
  1. Linus Torvalds On GCC 4.9: Pure & Utter Crap
  2. Cauldron 2014: GCC & LLVM Will Look To Collaborate More
  3. GCC Receives ACM Programming Languages Software Award
  4. KDE 4.14 Beta 3 Released
  5. A New Video Has Us Real Excited About The New UT For Linux
  6. CoreOS Experiences Its First Stable Release
  7. GNOME 3.13.4 Continues Working On Wayland & More
  8. Wine 1.7.23 Has Initial Support For 64-bit Android Builds
  9. FreeBSD Developing A New Automounter, Other Features
  10. Guix 0.7 Can Now Install The GNU Operating System
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Debian + radeonsi
  2. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  3. How To Setup Radeon DPM On Ubuntu Linux
  4. Open-source drivers on ATI R7 260X
  5. New build, first Linux PC, what could go wrong? ;)
  6. AMD "Hawaii" Open-Source GPU Acceleration Still Not Working Right
  7. Radeon related kernel bug??
  8. how the US intellegentia operates: